Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 33–57 | Cite as

Categorization of ambient media projects on their business models, innovativeness, and characteristics—evaluation of Nokia Ubimedia MindTrek Award Projects of 2010

  • Artur Lugmayr
  • Yaning Zou
  • Bjoern Stockleben
  • Kirsi Lindfors
  • Cai Melakoski
Article

Abstract

Ambient Media describe media environments, where the medium is embedded within the natural environment. They follow the anytime, anywhere, and anyhow principle for media access. The Nokia Ubimedia MindTreks Awards have been established a few years ago to explore the potential of ambient media. In this article we analyze the total project portfolio submitted to the 4th Nokia Ubimedia MindTrek Awards in 2010 according to their business value, innovativeness, and use of ambient media. The aim of this article is to gain insights into the general characteristics of ambient media, their properties, and business functions. The article rounds up in providing a substantial framework and guidelines for ambient media developers in their product designs.

Keywords

Ambient media Ubimedia Ubiqutious media Tangible user-interfaces Characteristics of ubqituous media MindTrek 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The ‘credits’ for this paper are definitely for several hard working teams that contributed to the competition. Only with their insights they provide new contributions to the field of ambient media. Several projects, as well as the competition can be found on [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Ambient Media Association (AMEA). www.ambientmediaassociation.org.
  2. 2.
    Forget P, Monteiro T, D’Amours S, Frayret J-M (December 2008) Collaborative agent-based negotiation in suppy chain planning using multi-behaviour agents. Technical Report CIRRELT-2008-54, CIRRELT (Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Neworks, Logistics and Transportation), Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI ’97, New York, NY, USA, pp. 234–241. ACM.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeon N, Leem C, Kim M, Shin H (2007) A taxonomy of ubiquitous computing applications. Wireless Pers Comm 43:1229–1239. doi: 10.1007/s11277-007-9297-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koleva B, Benford S, Ng KH, Rodden T (2003) A framework for tangible user interfaces. In In workshop Proc. on Real World User Interfaces, Mobile HCI Conference 03, pp. 257–264.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kwon O, Yoo K, Suh E (2005) Ubidss: a proactive intelligent decision support system as an expert system deploying ubiquitous computing technologies. Expert Syst Appl 28(1):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lietsala K, Terentjeff T (2008) Ubimedia 2008. Technical report, Digibusiness Cluster Programme (OSKE)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lugmayr A (2007) Ambient media. Novatica 33(188):35–39Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lugmayr A (December 2010) Connecting the real world with the digital overlay with smart ambient media—applying Peirce’s categories in the context of ambient media. Multimed Tool Appl:1–14.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lugmayr A (2010) Discussion of the research design for evaluating ambient media on their innovativeness. In: Lugmayr A, Stockleben B, Kaario J, Pogorelc B, Risse T (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd Semantic Ambient Media Experience (SAME) Workshop in Conjuncts with AmI-10, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Tampere, Finland. Tampere University of Technology (TUT), pp 46–50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lugmayr A, Stockleben B, Kaario J, Pogorelc B, Risse T (2010) 3rd workshop on semantic ambient media experience (same)—in conjunction with ami-2010. In: de Ruyter B, Wichert R, Keyson D, Markopoulos P, Streitz N, Divitini M, Georgantas N, Gomez AM (eds) Ambient Intelligence, volume 6439 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, pp. 342–345,  10.1007/978-3-642-16917-5_44.
  14. 14.
    Merriam-Webster. Merriam-webster online dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/.
  15. 15.
    Nomura Research Institute (NRI). Ubiquitous network and market creation. http://www.nri.co.jp/english/.
  16. 16.
    Ogden C, Richards I (1923) The meaning of meaning. Routledge & Kegan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pousman Z, Stasko J (2006) A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, AVI ’06. New York, NY, USA, pp. 67–74. ACM.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schumpeter J (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schumpeter J (1997) Theorie der wirtschaflichen Entwicklung: eine Untersuchung ueber Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zinz und den Konjunkturzyklus, 9th edn. Dunker und Humbolt, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tagg P (July 1999) Introductory notes to the semiotics of music (version 3). http://tagg.org/xpdfs/semiotug.pdf.
  22. 22.
    Tien JM (1999) Toward a decision informatics paradigm: a real-time, information-based approach to decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 33(1):102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tuomi I (1999) Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy to knowledge management and organization memory. In 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wright P, Wallace J, McCarthy J (December 2008) Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 15:181–1821Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artur Lugmayr
    • 1
  • Yaning Zou
    • 2
  • Bjoern Stockleben
    • 3
  • Kirsi Lindfors
    • 4
  • Cai Melakoski
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Business Information Management and LogisticsTampere University of Technology (TUT)TampereFinland
  2. 2.Department of Communications EngineeringTampere University of Technology (TUT)TampereFinland
  3. 3.University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-StendalMagdeburgGermany
  4. 4.Tampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  5. 5.Tampere University of Applied SciencesTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations