Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 217–226 | Cite as

A service component based CAT system with SCORM for advanced learning effects

  • Hwa-Young Jeong
  • Bong-Hwa Hong


In the web-based learning system, a variety of learning materials such as text, video, sound, and picture are employed with the objective of improving the learning effect. One of the main problems facing such systems is the systems’ ability to support the materials and integrate them into the system in such a way that they can be tailored to the user’s ability level. Accordingly, it is very difficult for the system to support user-oriented learning materials or courses efficiently. In this research, we applied the CAT (Computerized Adaptive Testing) system with SCORM interfaces to improve the learning effect. CAT is a method which focuses on analysis and evaluation of learning outcomes. SCORM is an international standard used to manage the learning materials. To support user-oriented learning and testing, we made a learning process using IRT (Item response theory). Throughout the process in this system, we implemented logic as a service component. The system process performs the learning test program’s logic by interface between the service components. The structure of this system interlinks SCORM API with the learning contents and items through a separate e-learning server.


CBD Service component SCORM CAT Learning materials Learning multimedia resources 


  1. 1.
    Beisiegel M, et al. (2007) Service component architecture specification,
  2. 2.
    Chao RJ, Chen YH (2009) Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 36:10657–10662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen LH (2010) Web-based learning programs: Used by learners with various cognitive styles. Comput Educ 54:1028–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen CM, Chung CJ (2008) Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Comput Educ 51:624–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Overview, (2008), National Council of State Boards of NursingGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding Z, Chen Z, Liu J (2008) A rigorous model of service component architecture. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 207:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gert J, Stef VB (2006) Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children. Wiley InterScience 29:2629–2638Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han JH, Jo MH, Jones V, Jo JH (2008) Comparative study on the educational use of home robots for children. Journal of Information Processing Systems, Vol.4, No.4, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeong HY, Hong BH (2011) An Application of SCORM Based CAT for E-Learning, Future Information Technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science 184(2):230–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jo MH, Han JH (2006) Metaphor and typeface based on children’s sensibilities for e-learning. International Journal of Information Processing Systems 2(3):178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li T, Yu F, Lin Y, Kong X, Yu Y (2010) Trusted computing dynamic attestation using a static analysis based behaviour model. Journal of Convergence 2(1):61–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markus L (2007) Applications = Components +GLoo. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 182:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marta RL, Rebeca PD, Ana FV, Jose JP, Jorge GD, Alberto GS, Manuel RC (2009) An extension to the ADL SCORM standard to support adaptivity: the t-learning case-study. Computer Standards & Interfaces 31:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maxim M (2010) Extensible dependency grammar for education: ideas and experiments. Journal of Convergence 1(1):29–34Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Omaima B (2011) Exploring consumers acceptance of mobile payments an empirical study. Int J Inf Technol Commun Converg 1(2):173–185Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozge Y, Tufan A (2010) A working successor of learning management systems: SLOODLE. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2:5682–5685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patricia AD (1999) Considerations in developing and using computer-adaptive tests to assess second language proficiency, Georgia State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ronald DA, Douglas HJ, Nicole BK, Peter JP (2006) Computerized adaptive testing with multiple form structures, computerized testing report 99–14, A Publication of the Law School Admission Council, MayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanitas CollegeKyunghee UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Information CommunicationKyunghee Cyber UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations