Advertisement

Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 101, Issue 1–2, pp 27–39 | Cite as

Analyzing Radar Meteor Trail Echoes using the Fresnel Transform Technique: A Signal Processing Viewpoint

  • Arnab Roy
  • John F. Doherty
  • John D. Mathews
Article

Abstract

Several techniques have been proposed for measuring speeds of meteoroids observed using radars. A recent technique involves the use of Fresnel transforms to accurately determine the speed of a meteoroid producing the trail. We follow a numerical modeling approach to analyze this technique in detail. Our studies indicate that high sensitivity to background noise levels might be a possible shortcoming of the Fresnel transform method. A matched filtering approach is presented as an alternative to alleviate this sensitivity to the noise problem. Performance of the two techniques is compared using numerical modeling and data from a 30 MHz radar.

Keywords

Meteors Meteoroids Radar velocity Fresnel transform Matched filters 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank D. L. Hysell for providing the St. Croix data used in this study. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through NSF grant no. ITR/AP 04-27029 to The Pennsylvania State University. The authors also wish to thank the reviewers for several useful suggestions.

References

  1. D. Badger, Fine structure in radio meteor showers. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  2. W.J. Baggaley, J. Grant, Earth Moon Planets 91, 601 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. W.J. Baggaley, R.G.T. Bennett, D.I. Steel, A.D. Taylor, Q. J. R. Astronom. Soc. 35, 293 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. W.J. Baggaley, R.G.T. Bennett, A.D. Taylor, Planet. Space Sci. 45, 577 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Campbell, W.G. Elford, Planet. Space Sci. 54, 317 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Z. Ceplecha, J. Borovicka, W.G. Elford, D.O. Revelle, R.L. Hawkes, V. Porubcan, M. Simek, Space Sci. Rev. 84, 327 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. M.A. Cervera, W.G. Elford, D.I. Steel, Radio Sci. 32(2), 805 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. J.L. Chau, R.F. Woodman, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 511 (2004)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. W.G. Elford, in Proceedings of Meteoroid 2001 Conference, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 405–411Google Scholar
  10. W.G. Elford, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 911 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. C.D. Ellyett, J.G. Davies, Nature 161, 596 (1948)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. J.S. Hey, S.J. Parsons, G.S. Stewart, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 107, 176 (1947)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. W.K. Hocking, Radio Sci. 35, 1205 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. D.A. Holdsworth, W.G. Elford, R.A. Vincent, I.M. Reid, D.J. Murphy, W. Singer, Ann. Geophys. 25, 385 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D.L. Hysell, M. Yamamoto, S. Fukao, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. D.L. Hysell, M.F. Larsen, Q.H. Zhou, Ann. Geophys. 22, 3277 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. J.D. Mathews, J.F. Doherty, C.H. Wen, S.J. Briczinski, D. Janches, D.D. Meisel, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 65, 1139 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. D.W.R. McKinley, Meteor Science and Engineering. (McGraw-Hill, 1961)Google Scholar
  19. C.H. Wen, J.F. Doherty, J.D. Mathews, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42, 501 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communications and Space Sciences LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations