Skip to main content

Modeling the Optimal Supply Chain of Liquefied Natural Gas as Fuel in Fishing Vessels in Mexico

Abstract

The global energy transition process has generated a set of modifications in the generation and consumption of energy. Environmental objectives have gained great relevance for regions, countries and companies. The fishing sector has been identified as having a broad environmental impact, which is why the transition to cleaner energy sources in this sector has been considered. One of the proposed strategies is based on the transition from the diesel engines of the ships to the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG), however, this transition requires guaranteeing the supply of fuel as well as the process of reconversion of units in operation and the impulse of LNG gas engines for new units. This work presents a proposal for the design of an LNG gas supply chain for the fishing industry in the State of Tampico in Mexico that allows evaluating the feasibility of the transition from the use of diesel to natural gas in fishing vessels. The main results show the feasibility of the transition in the fuel supply and economic and environmental benefits for the fishing industry. However, there is a significant challenge in converting units in operation to the use of natural gas due to the lack of public policies that promote and support its use in this sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Source: IEA, CO2 emissions from international shipping in the Net Zero Scenario, 2000–2030, IEA, Paris

Fig. 2

Source: U.S. Department of Energy (2022). Clean Cities Alternative Fuel Price Report

Fig. 3

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Source: Authors’ own elaboration

Fig. 6

Source: Anylogistix

Fig. 7

Source: Anylogistix

Fig. 8

Source: Anylogistix

Fig. 9

Source: Anylogistix

Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Source: Anylogistix

Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. IEA (2021a) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy: Overview, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-overview. Accessed 28 June 2021 

  2. Llardén A (2016) El gas natural licuado (GNL): combustible de presente y futuro para el transporte marítimo. Actualidad- ENAGÁS

  3. IEA (2021b) Tracking Transport 2021, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2021. Accessed 28 June 2021

  4. International Maritime Organization (2016). Studies on the feasibility and use of LNG as fuel for shipping. United Kingdom: Micropress Printers

  5. Llardén A. (2016, May 11). El gas natural licuado (GNL): combustible de presente y futuro para el transporte marítimo. https://www.antoniollarden.es/articulo/el-gas-natural-licuado-gnl-combustible-de-presente-y-futuro-para-el-transporte-maritimo/ [2021, June 28]

  6. IEA (2021c) International Shipping, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/international-shipping. Accessed 28 June 2021

  7. IMO (2021) Homepage, https://www.imo.org/es/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Paginas/Reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-ships.aspxAccessed 2021/05/22

  8. LNG vs Alternative Fuels (2019). The future of Sustainable Shipping. Amsterdam, Netherlands. LNG Bunkering Summit 2019 https://www.oilandgasiq.com/events-lng-bunkering-mediterranean/downloads/lng-vs-alternative-fuels-the-future-of-sustainable-shipping?-ty-m. Accessed   10 February 2022  

  9. International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers (2019). LNG Play Book. Paris: GIIGNL.

  10. Lowell D., Wang H., and Lutesy N. (2013). Assessment of the fuel cycle impact of liquefied natural gas as used in international shipping. The International Council on Clean Transportation. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCTwhitepaper_MarineLNG_130513.pdf . [2021, November 15]

  11. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (2020). Programa Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura 2020–2024. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/616554/PROGRAMA_Nacional_de_Pesca_y_Acuacultura_2020-2024baja.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2022 

  12. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca (2016) Acuerdos de Veda. https://www.gob.mx/conapesca/documentos/acuerdos-de-veda-publicados-en-el-diario-oficial-de1-la-federacion-en-el-ano-2016. Accessed 2019/10/22

  13. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2021). Pesca y acuicultura: Censos Económicos 2019. México: INEGI.

  14. Causa Natura (2022) Pescando datos. Disponible en línea en https://pescandodatos.causanatura.org/, consultado el 15 abril 2022

  15. SENER (2016) Prospectiva de Energías Renovables 2016–2030. Disponible en. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/177622/Prospectiva_de_Energ_as_Renovables_2016–2030.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021

  16. Secretaría de Energía (2014). Prospectiva de Gas Natural y Gas L.P. 2014–2028. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/62944/Gas_natural_y_Gas_L.P._2014-2028.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2022

  17. Schriber TJ, Brunner DT and Smith JS (2013) Inside discrete-event simulation software: How it works and why it matters. 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC), pp. 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2013.6721439

  18. Rodriguez-Aguilar R, Ortega LMAR, Marmolejo-Saucedo JA (2021) A comprehensive evaluation of environmental projects through a multiparadigm modeling approach. In: Vasant P, Zelinka I, Weber GW (eds) Intelligent Computing and Optimization ICO 2020 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1324. Springer: Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68154-8_46

  19. SEMARNAT (2015) Guía de Programas de Fomento a la Generación de Energía con Recusos Renovables. Disponible en. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/47854/Guia_de_programas_de_fomento.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2021

  20. Kronbak LG, Vestergaard N. (2013). Environmental cost-effectiveness analysis in intertemporal natural resource policy: evaluation of selective fishing gear. J Environ Manag 131:270-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.035.

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RR and HP contributed to conceptualization; RR, HP, and VM prepared original draft writing; RR and VM contributed to the methodology, supervision, reviewing, and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Román Rodríguez-Aguilar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernández-Palomo, G., Rodríguez-Aguilar, R. & Venegas-Martínez, F. Modeling the Optimal Supply Chain of Liquefied Natural Gas as Fuel in Fishing Vessels in Mexico. Mobile Netw Appl (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-022-02019-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-022-02019-0

Keywords

  • Supply chain
  • Liquefied natural gas
  • Fishing vessels
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • Optimization models