Research on Fault Feature Extraction and Recognition of Rolling Bearings

Abstract

In the field of system health management, the quality of rolling equipment is very important. Therefore, the fault diagnosis of rolling bearings has become a hot research topic. In this paper, the traditional fault feature extraction method is used to optimize the non-linear and non-stationary characteristics of the bearing vibration signal. Furthermore, in order to improve the performance of the fault diagnosis, a novel signal fingerprint is proposed to recognize the fault type. The simulation result show that the new method is successful and effective, and the recognition rate can be improved up to 95.33%, which is better than the traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Randall RB, Antoni J (2011) Rolling element bearing diagnosticsa tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(2):485–520

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dou Z, Xu X, Lin Y, Zhou R (2014) Application of ds evidence fusion method in the fault detection of temperature sensor. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2014

  3. 3.

    J. Gertler (2017). Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems. Routledge

  4. 4.

    Brkovic A, Gajic D, Gligorijevic J, Savic-Gajic I, Georgieva O, Di Gennaro S (2017) Early fault detection and diagnosis in bearings for more efficient operation of rotating machinery. Energy 136:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Abbaspour A, Aboutalebi P, Yen KK, Sargolzaei A (2017) Neural adaptive observer-based sensor and actuator fault detection in nonlinear systems: application in uav. ISA Trans 67:317–329

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Khalastchi E, Kalech M (2018) On fault detection and diagnosis inrobotic systems. ACM Computing Surveys(CSUR) 51(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Peeters C, Guillaume P, Helsen J (2018) Vibration-based bearing fault detection for operations and maintenance cost reduction in wind energy. Renew Energy 116:74–87

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tandon N, Choudhury A (1999) A review of vibration and acoustic measurement methods for the detection of defects in rolling element bearings. Tribol Int 32(8):469–480

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang X, Zhou J (2013) Multi-fault diagnosis for rolling element bearings based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and optimized support vector machines. Mech Syst Signal Process 41(1–2):127–140

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu S, Bai W, Liu G, Li W, Srivastava HM (2018) Parallel fractal compression method for big video data. Complexity, vol 2018

  11. 11.

    Wang M, Li Z, Huang D, Guo X (2018) Performance analysis of information fusion method based on bell function. International Journal of Performability Engineering 14(4):729–740

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen Z, Ding SX, Peng T, Yang C, Gui W (2017) Fault detection for non-gaussian processes using generalized canonical correlation analysis and randomized algorithms. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(2):1559–1567

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yu L, Junhong Z, Fengrong B, Jiewei L, Wenpeng M (2014) A fault diagnosis approach for diesel engine valve train based on improved itd and sdag-rvm. Measurement Science and Technology 26(2):025003

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Su Z, Tang B, Liu Z, Qin Y (2015) Multi-fault diagnosis for rotating machinery based on orthogonal supervised linear local tangent space alignment and least square support vector machine. Neurocomputing 157:208–222

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    El Morsy M, Achtenova G (2015) Rolling bearing fault diagnosis techniques-autocorrelation and cepstrum analyses. In: 2015 23rd Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation(MED), pp.328–334. IEEE

  16. 16.

    Huang H, Ouyang H, Gao H, Guo L, Li D, Wen J (2016) A feature extraction method for vibration signal of bearing incipient degradation. Measurement Science Review 16(3):149–159

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lin Y, Li Y, Yin X, Dou Z (2018) Multisensor fault diagnosis modeling based on the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Reliab 67(2):513–521

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peng Z, Chu F (2004) Application of the wavelet transform in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnostics: a review with bibliography. Mech Syst Signal Process 18(2):199–221

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Weickert T, Benjaminsen C, Kiencke U (2008) Analytic wavelet packetscombining the dual-tree approach with wavelet packets for signal analysis and filtering. IEEE Trans Signal Process 57(2):493–502

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Žvokeli M, Zupan S, Prebil I (2011) Non-linear multivariate and multiscale monitoring and signal denoising strategy using kernel principal component analysis combined with ensemble empirical mode decomposition method. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2631–2653

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Delgado-Arredondo PA, Morinigo-Sotelo D, Osornio-Rios RA, Avina-Cervantes JG, Rostro-Gonzalez H, de Jesus RomeroTroncoso R (2017) Methodology for fault detection in induction motors via sound and vibration signals. Mech Syst Signal Process 83:568–589

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Imaouchen Y, Kedadouche M, Alkama R, Thomas M (2017) A frequency-weighted energy operator and complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition for bearing fault detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lu S, He Q, Wang J (2019) A review of stochastic resonance in rotatingmachine fault detection. Mech Syst Signal Process 116:230–260

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Qiao Z, Lei Y, Li N (2019) Applications of stochastic resonance to machinery fault detection: a review and tutorial. Mech Syst Signal Process 122:502–536

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu S, Pan Z, Fu W, Cheng X (2017) Fractal generation method based on asymptote family of generalized Mandelbrot set and its application. Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications 3:1148–1161

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zheng S, Qi P, Chen S, Yang X (2019) Fusion methods for cnn-based automatic modulation classification. IEEE Access 7:66496–66504

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Luo B, Wang H, Liu H, Li B, Peng F (2018) Early fault detection of machine tools based on deep learning and dynamic identification. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 66(1):509–518

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zidi S, Moulahi T, Alaya B (2017) Fault detection in wireless sensor networks through svm classifier. IEEE Sensors J 18(1):340–347

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhou JT, Du J, Zhu H, Peng X, Liu Y, Goh RSM (2019) Anomalynet: an anomaly detection network for video surveillance. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 14(10):2537–2550

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xiao Y, Xing C, Zhang T, Zhao Z (2019) An intrusion detection model based on feature reduction and convolutional neural networks. IEEE Access 7:42210–42219

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cobb WE, Garcia EW, Temple MA, Baldwin RO, Kim YC (2010) Physical layer identification of embedded devices using rf-dna fingerprinting. In: 2010-Milcom 2010 Military Communications Conference, pp.2168–2173. IEEE

  32. 32.

    Y. Lin, M. Wang, X. Zhou, G. Ding, and S. Mao,” (2020). Dynamic spectrum interaction of uav flight formation communication with priority:A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking

  33. 33.

    J. Li and Y. Ying (2020). “Gas turbine gas path diagnosis under transient operating conditions: A steady state performance model based localoptimization approach,” Appl Therm Eng, p.115025

  34. 34.

    G. Baldini, R. Giuliani, G. Steri, and R. Neisse (2017), “Physical layer authentication of internet of things wireless devices through permutation and dispersion entropy,” in 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit(GloTS), pp.1–6, IEEE

  35. 35.

    Ureten O, Serinken N (2007) Wireless security through rf fingerprinting. Can J Electr Comput Eng 32(1):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    T. J. Carbino, M. A. Temple, and J. Lopez (2015), “A comparison of phy-based fingerprinting methods used to enhance network access control,” in IFIP International Information Security and Privacy Conference, pp.204–217. Springer

  37. 37.

    Peng L, Hu A, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Yu J, Yan Y (2018) Design of a hybrid rf fingerprint extraction and device classification scheme. IEEE Internet Things J 6(1):349–360

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang H, Li J, Guo L, Dou Z, Lin Y, Zhou R (2017) Fractal complexity-based feature extraction algorithm of communication signals. Fractals 25(04):1740008

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Klein RW, Temple MA, Mendenhall MJ (2009) Application of wavelet-based rf fingerprinting to enhance wireless network security. J Commun Netw 11(6):544–555

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang G, Yuan Y, Wang X, Huang Z (2016) Specific emitter identification based on nonlinear dynamical characteristics. Can J Electr Comput Eng 39(1):34–41

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lin Y, Zhu X, Zheng Z, Dou Z, Zhou R (2019) The individual identification method of wireless device based on dimensionality reduction and machine learning. J Supercomput 75(6):3010–3027

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Whitney AW (1971) A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection. IEEE Trans Comput 100(9):1100–1103

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bearing Data Center Website, Case Western Reserve University n.d., https://csegroups.case.edu/bearingdatacenter/home

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.51909125), Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (No.LGF20E060001) and the K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guochun Xu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, F., Xu, G. Research on Fault Feature Extraction and Recognition of Rolling Bearings. Mobile Netw Appl (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-020-01611-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fault diagnosis
  • Feature extraction
  • Feature selection
  • Fault recognition
  • Signal fingerprint