Multi Information Amount Movement Aware- Routing in FANET: Flying Ad-hoc Networks

  • Sheryl RadleyEmail author
  • Cynthia J. Sybi
  • K. Premkumar


Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) having few requests, for instances, catastrophic event, sensor systems and many more. What so ever may be the case, there are many outrageous circumstances where MANETs could come in hand. In such circumstances, flying specially appointed systems such as Flying ad hoc networks (FANET) could assumes imperative job to be built upon the correspondence. Flying Ad hoc Networks is a sub class of Mobile Ad hoc Networks. Swarms of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) orchestrate themselves to convey in enormous operational zone utilizing remote system with no unified gadget. The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is said to be a Drone. They speak with one another in the vicinity, with BS and furthermore communicate with their condition to get data. Various sorts of Drone dependent on the different application zones in FANETs. Drones are utilized by the FANETs, Drone is an airplane that flies without pilot. Attributable to its qualities, for instances, high versatility, quick topology changes, and incessant connection disappointments. In this manner, building up a proficient directing convention over FANETs is an exceptionally testing issue and thus set off the consideration of a great deal of ebb and flow analysts. In the present article, a Multi Information Amount Movement Aware (MIAMA) has been proposed convention having novel steering along with control measured components has recommended. Essentially, Multi Information Amount Movement Aware convention is considered as a noteworthy expansion of Mobility Aware Dual Phase AODV with Adaptive Hello Messages (MA-DP-AODV-AHM) convention. Network Simulator 2 test system has been used in which gigantic reproductions has led under the base of Drone, parcel rate along with consistent piece rate associations. Recreation results abridge that MIAMA contributes productively in alleviating the system flimsiness through creating quick and stable courses and diminishing connection disappointments.


Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) Flying ad hoc networks (FANET) Global positioning system (GPS) Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) 



  1. 1.
    Aadil F, Raza A, Khan M, Maqsood M, Mehmood I, Rho S (2018) Energy aware cluster-based routing in flying ad-hoc networks. Sensors 18(5):1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bekmezci I, Sahingoz OK, Temel Ş (2013) Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 11(3):1254–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilal R, Khan BM (2017) Analysis of mobility models and routing schemes for flying ad-hoc networks (FANETS). Int J Appl Eng Res 12(12):3263–3269Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bouachir O, Abrassart A, Garcia F, Larrieu N (2014) A mobility model for UAV ad hoc network. In: 2014 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS). IEEE, p. 383-388Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chauhan A, Singla MR (2016) A detail review on unmanned aeronautical ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) 5(5)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fida N, Khan F, Jan MA, Khan Z (2016) Performance analysis of vehicular adhoc network using different highway traffic scenarios in cloud computing. In: International conference on future intelligent vehicular technologies. Springer, Cham, p 157-166Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frew EW, Brown TX (2009) Networking issues for small unmanned aircraft systems. J Intell Robot Syst 54(1–3):21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta L, Jain R, Vaszkun G (2015) Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 18(2):1123–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jan M, Nanda P, Usman M, He X (2017) PAWN: a payload-based mutual authentication scheme for wireless sensor networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 29(17):e3986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin L, Sun Q, Wang S, Yang F (2012) A geographic mobility prediction routing protocol for ad hoc UAV network. In: 2012 IEEE Globecom workshops. IEEE, p. 1597-1602Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maistrenko VA, Alexey LV, Danil VA (2016) Experimental estimate of using the ant colony optimization algorithm to solve the routing problem in FANET. In: 2016 international Siberian conference on control and communications (SIBCON). IEEE, p. 1-10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohammed F, Jawhar I, Mohamed N, Idries A (2016) Towards trusted and efficient UAV-based communication. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd international conference on big data security on cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE international conference on high performance and smart computing (HPSC), and IEEE international conference on intelligent data and security (IDS). IEEE, p. 388-393Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosati S, Krużelecki K, Heitz G, Floreano D, Rimoldi B (2015) Dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(3):1690–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosati S, Krużelecki K, Traynard L, Mobile BR (2013) Speed-aware routing for UAV ad-hoc networks. In: 2013 IEEE Globecom workshops (GC Wkshps). IEEE, p. 1367-1373Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sahingoz OK (2014) Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 74(1–2):513–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saleem Y, Rehmani MH, Zeadally S (2015) Integration of cognitive radio technology with unmanned aerial vehicles: issues, opportunities, and future research challenges. J Netw Comput Appl 50:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh K, Verma AK (2014) Applying OLSR routing in FANETs. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on advanced communications, control and computing technologies. IEEE, p. 1212-1215Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tareque MH, Hossain MS, Atiquzzaman M (2015) On the routing in flying ad hoc networks. In: 2015 federated conference on computer science and information systems (FedCSIS). IEEE, p. 1-9Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    To L, Bati A, Hilliard D (2009) Radar cross section measurements of small unmanned air vehicle systems in non-cooperative field environments. In: 2009 3rd European conference on antennas and propagation. IEEE, p. 3637-3641Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vasiliev DS, Abilov A, Khvorenkov VV (2016) Peer selection algorithm in flying ad hoc networks. In: 2016 international Siberian conference on control and communications (SIBCON). IEEE, p. 1-4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yadav K, Nain A, Maakar S (2015) Routing protocols in FANET: survey. In: Proceedings of National Conference on innovative trends in computer science engineering (ITCSE-2015), ISSN, p. 2349-7688Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yanmaz E, Costanzo C, Bettstetter C, Elmenreich W (2010) A discrete stochastic process for coverage analysis of autonomous UAV networks. In: 2010 IEEE Globecom workshops. IEEE, p. 1777-1782Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yap WS, Liu JK, Tan SY, Goi BM (2015) On the security of a lightweight authentication and encryption scheme for mobile ad hoc network. Security and Communication Networks 8(17):3094–3098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zafar W, Khan BM (2017) A reliable, delay bounded and less complex communication protocol for multicluster FANETs. Digital Communications and Networks 3(1):30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ECEMeenakshi College of EngineeringChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of CSE, Saveetha School of EngineeringSaveetha Institute of Medical and Technical SciencesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations