Advertisement

A Communication Method between High-speed UUV and Distributed Intelligent Nodes

  • Xuefei Ma
  • Bo Wang
  • Lei Li
  • Tingting Wang
  • Pengpeng Hu
  • Yun LinEmail author
Article
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a doppler distortion compensation method for underwater transmission of OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) signals is proposed, which is used to realize real-time underwater acoustic communication between high-speed UUV (Unmanned Underwater Vehicle) and intelligent nodes. The method decomposes channel variations based on a functions with a set of known equations. OFDM symbol reconstruction is performed after the Taylor(T) FFT (Fast Fourier Transformation) process. We design an adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm based on MMSE criterion to learn the combiner weights for differentially coherent detection, thereby achieving adaptive channel equalization in the underwater acoustic channel. Comprehensive data and experimental data from the recent mobile acoustic communication delta are used to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach. The method can realize high-speed underwater acoustic communication, provide data sample basis for long-term big data analysis, and realize real-time communication result analysis.

Keywords

OFDM Doppler Stochastic gradient adaptive algorithm UUV 

Notes

Funding

This work is supported in part by the Open fund of state key laboratory of underwater information and control (6142218061812), Key fund for equipment pre-research (61404150301), Open project of key laboratory of underwater acoustic communication and Marine information technology (UAC201804) and Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2019A006).

References

  1. 1.
    Bharati PV, Rao SK, Krishna AR (2013) Generation and analysis of tactics for anti-torpedo defense system. Information & Communication Technologies:382–387Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu T, Guan Y, Lin Y (2017) Research on modulation recognition with ensemble learning. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw (1):179Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gui G, Huang H, Song Y, Sari H (2018) An Effective NOMA Scheme based on Deep Learning. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 67(9):8440–8450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu S, Fu W, He L et al (2017) Distribution of primary additional errors in fractal encoding method. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5787–5802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu S, Pan Z, Fu W, Cheng X (2017) Fractal generation method based on asymptote family of generalized Mandelbrot set and its application. Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications 10(3):1148–1161MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin Y, Zhu X, Zheng Z et al (2017) The individual identification method of wireless device based on dimensionality reduction and machine learning. J Supercomput (5):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s1122701722162
  7. 7.
    Sun J, Wang W, Kou L, Lin Y, Zhang L, Da Q et al (2017) A data authentication scheme for UAV ad hoc network communication. J Supercomput (8):1–16Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song H, Rawat D, Jeschke S, Brecher C (2016) Cyber-Physical Systems: Foundations, Principles and Applications. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin Y, Wang C, Wang J, Dou Z (2016) A Novel Dynamic Spectrum Access Framework Based on Reinforcement Learning for Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks. Sensors 16(10):1–22.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s16101675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin Y, Wang C, Ma C, Dou Z, Ma X (2016) A new combination method for multisensor conflict information. J Supercomput 72(7):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang B, Tu Y, Zhang S, Lin Y (2018) Digital signal modulation classification with data augmentation using generative adversarial nets in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Access 99:1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang H, Guo L, Dou Z, Lin Y (2018) A new method of cognitive signal recognition based on hybrid information entropy and d-s evidence theory. Mobile Networks & Applications (4):1–9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin Y, Li Y, Yin X, Dou Z (2018) Multisensor fault diagnosis modeling based on the evidence theory. IEEE Trans Reliab:99, 1–99, 9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu Q, Li Y, Lin Y (2016) The application of nonlocal total variation in image denoising for mobile transmission. Multimed Tools Appl 76(16):1–13Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang H, Li J, Guo L, Dou Z, Lin Y, Zhou R (2017) Fractal complexity-based feature extraction algorithm of communication signals. Fractals-complex Geometry Patterns & Scaling in. Nature & Society 25(5):1740008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liao J, Qiao G, Ma X (2014) A novel parallel interference cancellation scheme for OFDM in time-varying underwater acoustic channels. In: International Conference on Mechatronic Sciences, Electric Engineering and Computer, pp 3692–3696Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang Z, Song H, Watkins DW et al (2015) Cyber-physical systems for water sustainability: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Commun Mag 53(5):216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aval YM, Stojanovic M (2015) Differentially coherent multichannel detection of acoustic ofdm signals. IEEE J Ocean Eng 40(2):251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gang Q, Babar Z, Lu M, Lei W, Xin Q, Xue L et al (2018) Shallow water acoustic channel modeling and MIMO-OFDM simulations. International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology:709–715Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ma X, Zhao CH, Qiao G (2009) The Underwater Acoustic MIMO OFDM System Channel Equalizer Basing on Independent Component Analysis. Wri International Conference on Communications and Mobile Computing:568–572Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Effect WAG (2014) The nonlocal sparse reconstruction algorithm by similarity measurement with shear let feature vector. Math Probl Eng 2014:1): 1–1): 8Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yerramalli S, Stojanovic M, Mitra U (2012) Partial fft demodulation: a detection method for highly doppler distorted ofdm systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60(11):5906–5918MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma X, Wang T, Lin Y et al (2012) Parallel Iterative Intercarrier Interference Cancellation in Underwater Acoustic Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing. Wirel Pers Commun 2018(5):1–14Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ma X, Zheng C (2016) Decision fractional fast fourier transform doppler compensation in underwater acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing. J Acoust Soc Am 140(5):EL429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shi C, Dou Z, Lin Y, Li W (2018) Dynamic threshold-setting for rf-powered cognitive radio networks in non-gaussian noise. Physical Communication 27Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang X, Liu KJR (2002) An adaptive channel estimation algorithm using time-frequency polynomial model for ofdm with fading multipath channels. Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2002(8):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang T, Proakis J. G, Zeidler J. R (2005) Techniques for suppression of intercarrier interference in ofdm systems. Wireless Communications & Networking ConferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Acoustic Science and Technology LaboratoryHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Marine Information Acquisition and Security, Ministry of Industry and Information TechnologyHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  3. 3.College of Underwater Acoustic EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina
  4. 4.College of Information and Communication EngineeringHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations