Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the Performance of Challenged Networks with Controlled Mobility

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the application of an adapted controlled mobility strategy on self-propelling nodes, which could efficiently provide network resource to users scattered on a designated area. We design a virtual force-based controlled mobility scheme, named VFPc, and evaluate its ability to be jointly used with a dual packet-forwarding and epidemic routing protocol. In particular, we study the possibility for end-users to achieve synchronous communications at given times of the considered scenarios. On this basis, we study the delay distribution for such user traffic and show the advantages of VFPc compared to other packet-forwarding and packet-replication schemes, and highlight that VFPc-enabled applications could take benefit of both schemes to yield a better user experience, despite challenging network conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanou B (2015) ICT facts and figures 2015 international telecommunication union (ITU) fact sheet

  2. Nelson CB, Steckler BD, Stamberger JA (2011) The evolution of hastily formed networks for disaster response: technologies, case studies, and future trends. In: IEEE global humanitarian techniques conference, vol 467–475, Seattle

  3. Reynaud L, Rasheed T, Kandeepan S (2011) An integrated aerial telecommunications network that supports emergency traffic. In: 14th international wireless personal multimedia communications, Brest

  4. Gomez K et al (2016) Aerial base stations with opportunistic links for next generation emergency communications. IEEE Commun Mag 54(4):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Corson S, Macker J (1999) Mobile Ad hoc networking (MANET): routing protocol performance issues and evaluation considerations. RFC:2501

  6. Reina DG et al (2015) A survey on multihop ad hoc networks for disaster response scenarios. Int J Distrib Sensor Networks 2015

  7. Sassatelli L et al (2014) Reliable transport in delay-tolerant networks with opportunistic routing. IEEE Trans Wireless Com 13(10):5546–5557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fall K (2003) A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM. Karlsruhe, Germany, p 2003

  9. Li Y, Hui P, Jin D, Chen S (2015) Delay-tolerant network protocol testing and evaluation. IEEE Com Mag 53(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spyropoulos T, Psounis K, Raghavendra CS (2005) Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In: Proceedings of ACM workshop on delay-tolerant networking

  11. Burgess J, Gallagher B, Jensen D, Levine BN (2006) Maxprop: routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In: IEEE INFOCOM, Barcelona

  12. Balasubramanian A, Levine BN, Venkataramani A (2007) DTN Routing as a resource allocation problem. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM

  13. Clausen T, Jacquet P RFC3626, Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). Experimental, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3626.txt

  14. Alenazi MJF, Cheng Y, Zhang D, Sterbenz JPG (2015) Epidemic routing protocol implementation in ns-3. Workshop on ns-3, Barcelona

  15. Ahmed B, Pota H, Garratt M (2008) Flight control of a Rotary wing UAV - a practical approach. In: IEEE Conference on decision and control, Cancun

  16. Spears WM, Spears DF, Hamann JC, Heil R (2004) Distributed, physics-based control of swarms of vehicles. Auton Robots 17(2/3):137–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynaud L, Guérin Lassous I (2016) Design of a force-based controlled mobility on aerial vehicles for pest management. Elsevier ad Hoc Netw J 53:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reynaud L, Guérin Lassous I (2016) Physics-based swarm intelligence for disaster relief communications. In: International conference on ad hoc net and wireless (AdHoc-Now), Lille

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao W, Ammar M, Zegura E (2005) Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network. IEEE INFOCOM, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bin Tariq MM, Ammar M, Zegura E (2006) Message ferry route design for sparse ad hoc networks with mobile nodes. In: Proceedings of 7th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing, Florence

  21. Basagni S, et al. (2008) Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor networks lifetime. Wireless Netw J 14(6):831– 858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brambilla M, Ferrante E, Birattari M, Dorigo M (2013) Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intell 7(1):1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nouyan S, Campo A, Dorigo M (2008) Path formation in a robot swarm: self-organized strategies to find your way home. Swarm Intell 2(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sperati V, Trianni V, Nolfi S (2011) Self-organised path formation in a swarm of robots. Swarm Intell 5:97–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Reynaud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynaud, L., Guérin-Lassous, I. Improving the Performance of Challenged Networks with Controlled Mobility. Mobile Netw Appl 23, 1270–1279 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0818-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-017-0818-9

Keywords

Navigation