Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 814–824 | Cite as

Energy-Efficient Context Aware Power Management with Asynchronous Protocol for Body Sensor Network

  • Michele Magno
  • Tommaso Polonelli
  • Filippo Casamassima
  • Andres Gomez
  • Elisabetta Farella
  • Luca Benini
Article

Abstract

MEMS sensor technology and advances in electronics, low-power processors and communication have enabled ubiquitous monitoring, providing significant opportunities for a wide range of applications including wearable devices for fitness and health tracking. However, due to the limited form factor required, there remains a challenging issue that limits even more the success of wearable devices: the limited lifetime due to the small energy storages that supply the devices. This limitation affects usability and forces the data processing to keep low-complexity to match the power constraints. As wireless communication is typically the most power hungry activity in wearable sensors devices, many techniques focus on reducing the communication power consumption. For this reason, advanced power management can be exploited to increase the lifetime of the devices. In this work, we present a wireless body area network with an adaptive power management strategy combining an ultra-low power wake up radio with context awareness. The context aware power manager is based on activity recognition, which is evaluated to decide which other nodes must be activated. The nano-power wake up receiver is used to reduce the idle listening power of the main radio and enable an asynchronous ultra-low power protocol. In order to evaluate the benefit, we present a real world application to assist elderly people in gait rehabilitation through a closed loop feedback. Experimental results demonstrate the benefit of the proposed power management in terms of energy efficiency. We evaluate the overall power consumption of the system and the lifetime extension, which can increase up to a factor of 4 depending on the amount of time the system can be placed in sleep mode.

Keywords

Body area networks Power management Wake-up receiver Energy efficiency Context recognition Asynchronous communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Transient Computing Systems”, SNF project (200021_157048), by SCOPES SNF project (IZ74Z0_160481), and ETHZ Grant funding.

References

  1. 1.
    Magno M, Spagnol C, Benini L, Popovici E (2014) A low power wireless node for contact and contactless heart monitoring. Microelectron J 45(12):1656–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U Sana, and K. S. Kwak (2012) An ultra low-power and traffic-adaptive medium access control protocol for wireless body area network. J Med Syst 36.3: 1021–1030Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hyocheol Jeong, Jeonghyun Kim, and Younghwan Yoo (2011) Adaptive broadcasting method using neighbor type information in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 11(6), 5952–5967Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. Casamassima, E. Farella, and L. Benini (2014) Context aware power management for motion-sensing body area network nodes”. In Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition (DATE), (pp. 1–6). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Kamalinejad et al (2014) A high-sensitivity fully passive wake-up radio front-end for wireless sensor nodes. In proc. of Internation Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas. pp. 213–214Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kerhet A, Leonardi F, Boni A, Lombardo P, Magno M, Benini L (2007) Distributed video surveillance using hardware-friendly sparse large margin classifiers, Advanced video and signal based surveillance, 2007. AVSS 2007. IEEE Conference on, vol., no., pp.87,92Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts NE, Wentzloff DD (2012) A 98nW wake-up radio for wireless body area networks,” Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), 2012 IEEE, vol., no., pp.373–376Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magno M, Jelicic V, Srbinovski B, Bilas V, Popovici E, Benini L (2016) Design, implementation, and performance evaluation of a flexible low-latency Nanowatt wake-up radio receiver. in IEEE Trans Ind Inf 12(2):633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Groza B, Murvay S (2013) Efficient protocols for secure broadcast in controller area networks. Ind Inf IEEE Trans 9(4):2034–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casamassima F et al. (2014) A wearable system for gait training in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors 14(4):6229–6246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jurdak R, Baldi P, Lopes CV (2007) Adaptive low power listening for wireless sensor networks”. Mob Comput IEEE Trans, vol. 6, no.8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vodel M, Caspar M, Hardt W (2012) Wake-up-receiver concepts-capabilities and limitations. J Netw. 7.1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nilsson E, Svensson C (2013) Ultra low power wake-up radio using envelope detector and transmission line voltage transformer, emerging and selected topics in circuits and systems. IEEE J 3(1):5,12Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spenza Dora et al. (2015) Beyond duty cycling: wake-up radio with selective awakenings for long-lived wireless sensing systems. In proc. IEEE Conf Comput Commun. pp. 522–530.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jelicic V, Magno M, Brunelli D, Bilas V, Benini L (2012, October). Analytic comparison of wake-up receivers for WSNs and benefits over the wake-on radio scheme. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks (pp. 99–106). ACMGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jelicic V, Magno M, Brunelli D, Bilas V, Benini L (2014) Benefits of wake-up radio in energy-efficient multimodal surveillance wireless sensor network, IEEE Sensors JGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alírio Soares B, Borges Carvalho N (2013) A low-power wakeup radio for application in WSN-based indoor location systems. Int J Wireless Inf Networks 20(1):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takahagi K et al. (2013) Low-power wake-up receiver with subthreshold CMOS circuits for wireless sensor networks. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 75(2):199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magno M, Benini L (2014) An ultra low power high sensitivity wake-up radio receiver with addressing capability, Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 2014 I.E. 10th International Conference on, vol., no., pp. 92,99Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Molex (2012) Cellular 6-band standalone antenna 105263–002 Datasheet. http://www.symmetron.ru/news/files/pdf/molex/molex_6_band_antenna.pdf
  21. 21.
    Magno Michele et al (2013) Combination of hybrid energy harvesters with MEMS piezoelectric and nano-Watt radio wake up to extend lifetime of system for wireless sensor nodes.” Architecture of Computing Systems (ARCS), Proceedings of 2013 26th International Conference on. VDEGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anastasi G, Conti M, Di Francesco M (2009) Extending the lifetime of wireless sensor networks through adaptive sleep. Ind Inf IEEE Trans 5(3):351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Wang, V. Srinivasan, and K.C. Chua Extending the life-time of wireless sensor networks through mobile relays, presented at IEEE/ACM Trans Netw, 2008, pp. 1108–1120.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mamaghanian H, Khaled N, Atienza D, Vandergheynst P (2011) Compressed sensing for real-time energy-efficient ECG compression on wireless body sensor nodes. Biom Eng IEEE Trans 58(9):2456–2466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nilsson J-O et al (2012) Foot-mounted INS for everybody-an open-source embedded implementation. Position location and navigation symposium (PLANS), IEEE/Ion IEEE, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bulling Andreas, Ulf Blanke, and Bernt Schiele (2014) A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46.3: 33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Magno
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tommaso Polonelli
    • 2
  • Filippo Casamassima
    • 2
  • Andres Gomez
    • 1
  • Elisabetta Farella
    • 3
  • Luca Benini
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.D-ITET, ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.DEI, University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.ICT CenterFondazione Bruno KesslerTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations