Skip to main content
Log in

The Sink Node Placement and Performance Implication in Mobile Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile sensor networks are desirable in a variety of application scenarios, in which information collection is no doubt of great importance. In this paper, we present a mobile sensor network architecture consisting of a potentially large number of mobile sensors and a single or multiple stationary sink nodes for sensing information collection. We formulate a distinct coverage measurement problem in term of sensing information collection; we study the relevant performance and examine the effect from a variety of relevant factors through extensive simulations. We demonstrate that the performance is not only affected by the sensor mobility and the transmission range between mobile sensors and sink node(s), but also by the distribution of mobile sensors and the number and locations of sink nodes. Based on the observation and analysis, we also provide some preliminary understandings and implications for improving the information collection performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We choose the ratio between r, R and |A| by considering their magnitudes in realistic situations [15, 16].

References

  1. Wang D, Liu J, Zhang Q (2007) Probabilistic field coverage using a hybrid network of static and mobile sensors. Proc. of the IWQoS’07. Chicago, IL, USA, 20–22 June

  2. Bisnik N, Abouzeid A, Isler B (2006) Stochastic event capture using mobile sensors subject to a quality metric. Proc. of the ACM MOBICOM’06, Los Angeles, September

  3. Liu B, Brass P, Dousse O, Nain P, Towsley D (2005) Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks. Proc. of the ACM MOBIHOC’05. Urbana Champaign, IL. May

  4. Wang D, Liu J, Zhang Q (2007) Mobility-assisted sensor networking for field coverage. Proc. of the IEEE Globecom, November

  5. Luo J, Zhang Q (2007) Relative distance based localization for mobile sensor networks. Proc. of the IEEE Globecom, November

  6. Camp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for Ad Hoc network research. Wireless Communication & Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Research, Trends and Applications 2(5):483–502 September

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lima L, Barros J (2007) Random walks on sensor networks. Proc. of the 5th International Syposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt 2007), Limassol, Cyprus, April

  8. Shah R, Roy S, Jain S, Brunette W (2003) Data mules: Modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications (SNPA), May

  9. Kalpakis K, Dasgupta K, Namjoshi P (2003) Efficient algorithms for maximum lifetime data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks 42(6):697–716 August

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindsey S, Raghavendra CS (2002) Pegasis: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information system. Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, March

  11. Tan HO, Korpeoglu I (2003) Power efficient data gathering and aggregation in wireless sensor networks. SIGMOD Rec 32(4):66–71 December

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kansal A, Somasundara A, Jea D, Srivastava M, Estrin D (2004) Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks. Proc. of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (MobiSYS), June

  13. Zhao W, Ammar M, Zegura E (2004) A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks. Proc. of the 5th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc), ACM Press, pp. 187–198, May

  14. Shakkottai S, Srikant R, Shroff N (2003) Unreliable sensor grids: Coverage, connectivity and diameter. Proc. of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 03), April

  15. http://www.rabbit.com/products/ZigBee_App_Kit/ZigBee.pdf

  16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensor_node

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Y. Keung.

Additional information

The research was supported in part by grants from RGC under the contracts 615608, 616207 and 616406, by a grant from NSFC/RGC under the contract N_HKUST603/07, by a grant from HKUST under the contract RPC06/07. EG27, by a grant from NSF China under the contract 60573115, 40671145, by a grant from Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (05006623) and by a grant from National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under the contract 2006CB303000.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, Y., Xue, Y., Li, Q. et al. The Sink Node Placement and Performance Implication in Mobile Sensor Networks. Mobile Netw Appl 14, 230–240 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0158-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-009-0158-5

Keywords

Navigation