Skip to main content
Log in

Generic Architecture and Mechanisms for Protocol Reconfiguration

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The next generation of wireless mobile communications termed beyond 3G (or 4G), will be based on a heterogeneous infrastructure that comprises different wireless networks in a complementary manner. Beyond 3G will introduce reconfiguration capabilities to flexibly and dynamically (i.e., during operation) adapt the wireless protocol stacks to better meet the ever-changing service requirements. For the dynamic reconfiguration of protocol stacks during runtime operation to become a practical capability of mobile communication systems, it is necessary to establish a software architecture that functionally supports reconfiguration. In the present paper, a generic architecture and respective mechanisms to achieve protocol stack and component based protocol layer reconfiguration are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dillinger M, Madami K, Alonistioti N (2003) Software defined radio—architectures, systems and functions. Wiley series in Software Radio, Wiley, New York (ISBN 0-470-85164-3)

  2. Open Base Station Architecture Initiative, http://www.obsai.org/

  3. Common Public Radio Interface, http://www.cpri.info/

  4. NTT DoCoMo press release (2003, October 10) http://www.nttdocomo.com/presscenter/index.html

  5. Bickle J (2000, December 11) Software radio architecture (SRA) overview. OMG TC, Orlando, Florida

  6. OMG CORBA Components, version 3.0, June (2002), http://www.omg.org/

  7. OMG Software-Based Communication (SBC) Domain Task Force, http://sbc.omg.org/

  8. Tuttlebee W (2002) Software defined radio—enabling technologies. Wiley series in Software Radio, Wiley, New York (ISBN 0-470-84318-7)

  9. Hermann H, Johnson R, Engel R A framework for network protocol software. Proceedings OOPSLA ’95, ACM SIGPLAN Notices

  10. Janssens N, Michiels S, Verbaeten P (2001, November) DiPS/CuPS: a framework for runtime customizable protocol stacks. Technical report, DistriNet, K.U. Leuven

  11. Michiels S, Mahieu T, Matthijs F, Verbaeten P (2001, June) Dynamic protocol stack composition: protocol independent addressing. In 4th ECOOP Workshop on Object-Orientation and Operating Systems (ECOOPOOOSWS 2001)

  12. Hutchinson NC, Peterson LL (1991, January) The x-kernel: an architecture for implementing network protocols. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 17(1):64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mena S, Cuvellier X, Gregoire C, Schiper A (2003, October) Appia vs. Cactus: comparing protocol composition frameworks. 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS’03), Florence, Italy

  14. Kannan M, Komp E, Minden G, Evans J (2003, February) Design and implementation of composite protocols. Technical Report ITTC-FY2003-TR-19740-05

  15. Bruneton E, Coupaye T, Stefani JB (2002, June 10-14) Recursive and dynamic software composition with sharing. Seventh international workshop on component-oriented programming (WCOP02), Monday, June 10, 2002—At ECOOP 2002, Malaga, Spain

  16. Fassino JP, Stefani JB, Lawall J, Muller G (2002) THINK: a software framework for component-based operating system kernels. In Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference

  17. Minden G, Komp E, Ganje S, Kannan M, Subramaniam S, Tan S, Vallabhaneni S, Evans J (2002, May) Composite protocols for innovative active services. DARPA Active Networks Conference and Exposition (DANCE’02), San Francisco, California

  18. Pras A, Schoenwaelder J. On the difference between information models and Data Models. RFC 3444, http://www.ietf.org/

  19. RDF: Resource Description Framework home page, see http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  20. XML: Extensible Markup Language home page, see http://www.w3.org/XML/

  21. Hayes P. RDF Semantics, see http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

  22. Berners Lee T. Why RDF model is different from the XML model, W3C discussion note, see http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDF-XML.html

  23. Chang W A discussion of the relationship between RDF-Schema and UML, W3C discussion note, see http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-rdf-uml-19980804

  24. RDQL—A query language for RDF, W3C submission, http://www.w3.org/Submission/RDQL/

  25. 3GPP TS 24.008 V7.3.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Mobile radio interface Layer 3 specification; Core network protocols; Stage 3, http://www.3gpp.org/

  26. Patouni E, Alonistioti N (2006, June 26-29) A framework for the deployment of self-managing and self-configuring components in autonomic environments. In the Proceedings of the International IEEE WoWMoM Workshop on Autonomic Communications and Computing (ACC 06), Niagara-Falls/Buffalo-NY

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Alonistioti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonistioti, N., Patouni, E. & Gazis, V. Generic Architecture and Mechanisms for Protocol Reconfiguration. Mobile Netw Appl 11, 917–934 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-006-0058-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-006-0058-x

Keywords

Navigation