Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of gut microbiota profiles between patients suffering from elderly frailty syndrome and non-frail elderly individuals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Frailty syndrome is a state of increased vulnerability to stressors, marked by lowered physical strength and increased dependence on others. The well-established changes in gut microbiota associated with old age suggest a probable relationship between gut microbiota and frailty.

Methods and results

This study was aimed at finding the relationship between gut microbiota and frailty syndrome, by comparing the sociodemographic data and the gut microbiota profiles of 23 non-frail and 14 frail elderly individuals. We used the quantitative polymerase chain reaction method (qPCR) to determine the bacterial loads of Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, and Escherichia coli in stool samples from test subjects. We discovered a significant increase in the bacterial load of Prevotella in frail elderly individuals aged 70 or above. Other bacterial loads and ratios were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

More comprehensive studies with larger sample sizes and encompassing a wider range of inflammation-related bacteria need to be performed to discover the existence and exact nature of these relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wang X, Wu M (2021) Research progress of gut microbiota and frailty syndrome. Open Med (Wars) 16(1):1525–1536

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kale SS, Yende S (2011) Effects of aging on inflammation and Hemostasis through the Continuum of critical illness. Aging Dis 2(6):501–511

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Krabbe KS, Pedersen M, Bruunsgaard H (2004) Inflammatory mediators in the elderly. Exp Gerontol 39(5):687–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60(8):1487–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rohrmann S (2020) Epidemiology of Frailty in Older people. Adv Exp Med Biol 1216:21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14(6):392–397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Sabatino A, Lenti MV, Cammalleri L, Corazza GR, Pilotto A (2018) Frailty and the gut. Dig Liver Dis 50(6):533–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson LW, Artis D (2014) Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol 14(3):141–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sommer F, Bäckhed F (2013) The gut microbiota–masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(4):227–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patterson E, Ryan PM, Cryan JF, Dinan TG, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF et al (2016) Gut microbiota, obesity and diabetes. Postgrad Med J 92(1087):286–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Antunes LC, Finlay BB (2010) Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev 90(3):859–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biagi E, Candela M, Fairweather-Tait S, Franceschi C, Brigidi P (2012) Aging of the human metaorganism: the microbial counterpart. Age (Dordr) 34(1):247–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Odamaki T, Kato K, Sugahara H, Hashikura N, Takahashi S, Xiao J-z et al (2016) Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: a cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol 16(1):90

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen L, Zhang YH, Huang T, Cai YD (2016) Gene expression profiling gut microbiota in different races of humans. Sci Rep 6:23075

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaiserman A, Romanenko M, Piven L, Moseiko V, Lushchak O, Kryzhanovska N et al (2020) Differences in the gut Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio across age groups in healthy Ukrainian population. BMC Microbiol 20(1):221

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P et al (2020) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio: a relevant marker of gut dysbiosis in obese patients? Nutrients. ;12(5)

  17. Stojanov S, Berlec A, Štrukelj B (2020) The influence of Probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the Treatment of Obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms. ;8(11)

  18. Gupta VK, Paul S, Dutta C, Geography (2017) Ethnicity or subsistence-specific variations in Human Microbiome Composition and Diversity. Front Microbiol 8:1162

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ (1992) The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 40(9):922–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C, Vuyyuru H, Sasikala M, Nageshwar Reddy D (2015) Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J Gastroenterol 21(29):8787–8803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Tommaso N, Gasbarrini A, Ponziani FR (2021) Intestinal Barrier in Human Health and Disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. ;18(23)

  23. Gevers D, Knight R, Petrosino JF, Huang K, McGuire AL, Birren BW et al (2012) The human Microbiome Project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome. PLoS Biol 10(8):e1001377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Humphreys C (2020) 19 - intestinal permeability. In: Pizzorno JE, Murray MT (eds) Textbook of Natural Medicine (Fifth Edition). Churchill Livingstone, St. Louis (MO). 166 – 77.e4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez JE, Kahana DD, Ghuman S, Wilson HP, Wilson J, Kim SCJ et al (2021) Unhealthy lifestyle and gut dysbiosis: a better understanding of the effects of Poor Diet and Nicotine on the intestinal microbiome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:667066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F, Guimarăes V, Sokol H, Doré J et al (2009) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol 9:123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Al Bander Z, Nitert MD, Mousa A, Naderpoor N (2020) The gut microbiota and inflammation: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health. ;17(20)

  28. Wang J, Chen WD, Wang YD (2020) The Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory diseases: the role of macrophages. Front Microbiol 11:1065

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Precup G, Vodnar DC (2019) Gut Prevotella as a possible biomarker of diet and its eubiotic versus dysbiotic roles: a comprehensive literature review. Br J Nutr 122(2):131–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartstra AV, Bouter KE, Bäckhed F, Nieuwdorp M (2015) Insights into the role of the microbiome in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 38(1):159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gancz NN, Levinson JA, Callaghan BL (2023) Sex and gender as critical and distinct contributors to the human brain-gut-microbiome axis. Brain Res Bull 199:110665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li M, Budding AE, van der Lugt-Degen M, Du-Thumm L, Vandeven M, Fan A (2019) The influence of age, gender and race/ethnicity on the composition of the human axillary microbiome. Int J Cosmet Sci 41(4):371–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bohannon RW (2006) Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther 29(2):64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haarman M, Knol J (2005) Quantitative real-time PCR assays to identify and quantify fecal Bifidobacterium species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(5):2318–2324

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Delroisse JM, Boulvin AL, Parmentier I, Dauphin RD, Vandenbol M, Portetelle D (2008) Quantification of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in rat fecal samples by real-time PCR. Microbiol Res 163(6):663–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo X, Xia X, Tang R, Zhou J, Zhao H, Wang K (2008) Development of a real-time PCR method for Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in faeces and its application to quantify intestinal population of obese and lean pigs. Lett Appl Microbiol 47(5):367–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stach JEM, Maldonado LA, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull AT (2003) New primers for the class Actinobacteria: application to marine and terrestrial environments. Environ Microbiol 5(10):828–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Friswell MK, Gika H, Stratford IJ, Theodoridis G, Telfer B, Wilson ID et al (2010) Site and strain-specific variation in gut microbiota profiles and metabolism in experimental mice. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8584

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hosna Mirfakhraee, Maryam Niksolat and Sara Minaeian were responsible for conceptualization and development of the methodology. Hosna Mirfakhraee, Fatemeh Faraji and Samaneh Saghafian Larijani contributed to the laboratory work. Milad Sabaei, Soheil Rahmani Fard and Zhale Zandieh were responsible for data collection and literature search. Milad Sabaei and Hosna Mirfakhraee prepared the original draft of the manuscript. Soheil Rahmani Fard and Milad Sabaei were responsible for data analysis and visualization. Sara Minaeian, Fatemeh Faraji and Maryam Niksolat reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Minaeian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by scientific advisory and ethical committees of Iran University of medical sciences (Registration number: IR.IUMS.REC.1398.1380) and all patients were given complete explanation about the study procedures and protocol before signing written informed consent forms.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirfakhraee, H., Sabaei, M., Niksolat, M. et al. Comparison of gut microbiota profiles between patients suffering from elderly frailty syndrome and non-frail elderly individuals. Mol Biol Rep 51, 321 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09271-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09271-5

Keywords

Navigation