Abstract
Background
Being highly fragmented and low in concentration, isolation of good quality RNA from sperm cells is a big challenge. Attempts have been made to evaluate various sperm RNA isolation methods from purified buffalo bull sperm cells.
Methods
Both, non-membrane and membrane-based methods have been evaluated for isolating RNA from Murrah buffalo sperms and compared for their respective efficacies. The traditional TRIzol, TRIzol-heat lysed (H-TRIzol) and cocktail of TCEP-RLT lysis buffer (Qiagen RNeasy mini kit)-TRIzol (C-TRIzol) based isopropanol isolation methods have been evaluated.
Results
H-TRIzol yielded best results among conventional methods. The combined T-RLT RNA isolation protocol yielded best quality and quantity compared to other membrane-based methods, due to high lytic property of cocktail of lysis reagents, necessary for complete breakdown of sperm membrane and RNA binding membrane for RNA isolation. Combined lysis performed by treatment with RLT-T and T-RLT differing in order of reagents used were also evaluated. T-RLT combination giving better results compared to RLT-T due to high gDNA contamination and membrane clogging in later protocol steps.
Conclusion
Overall, in terms of total RNA quantity and quality per million spermatozoa, the heat-lysed TRIzol method (H-TRIzol) performs best among RNA separation techniques employed and is also quite easy to perform. This comparative evaluation of sperm RNA isolation protocols can be useful in deciding the best protocol for isolation of good quality and high concentration sperm RNA from buffalo semen, for transcriptome and other downstream studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Bissonnette N, Lévesque-Sergerie JP, Thibault C, Boissonneault G (2009) Spermatozoal transcriptome profiling for bull sperm motility: a potential tool to evaluate semen quality. Reproduction 138(1):65–80. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0503
Ganguly I, Gaur GK, Kumar S, Mandal DK, Kumar M, Singh U, Kumar S, Sharma A (2013) Differential expression of protamine 1 and 2 genes in mature spermatozoa of normal and motility impaired semen producing crossbred Frieswal (HF× Sahiwal) bulls. Res Vet Sci 94(2):256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.09.001
Parthipan S, Selvaraju S, Somashekar L, Arangasamy A, Sivaram M, Ravindra JP (2017) Spermatozoal transcripts expression levels are predictive of semen quality and conception rate in bulls (Bos taurus). Theriogenology 98:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.042
Wang X, Yang C, Guo F, Zhang Y, Ju Z, Jiang Q, Zhao X, Liu Y, Zhao H, Wang J, Sun Y, Wang C, Zhu H, Huang J (2019) Integrated analysis of mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in the semen from Holstein bulls with high and low sperm motility. Sci Rep 9(1):2092. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38462-x
Guo L, Chao SB, Xiao L, Wang ZB, Meng TG, Li YY, Han ZM, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Sun QY, Ou XH (2017) Sperm-carried RNAs play critical roles in mouse embryonic development. Oncotarget 8(40):67394–67405. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18672
Talluri TR, Kumaresan A, Sinha MK, Paul N, King ES, J. P., Datta TK (2022) Integrated multi-omics analyses reveals molecules governing sperm metabolism potentially influence bull fertility. Sci Rep 12(1):10692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14589-w
Reshi QUA, Godakumara K, Ord J, Dissanayake K, Hasan MM, Andronowska A, Heath P, Fazeli A (2022) Spermatozoa, acts as an external cue and alters the cargo and production of the extracellular vesicles derived from oviductal epithelial cells in vitro. J Cell Communication Signal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12079-022-00715-w
Card CJ, Anderson EJ, Zamberlan S, Krieger KE, Kaproth M, Sartini BL (2013) Cryopreserved bovine spermatozoal transcript profile as revealed by high-throughput ribonucleic acid sequencing. Biol Reprod 88(2):49. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.112.103788
Boerke A, Dieleman SJ, Gadella BM (2007) A possible role for sperm RNA in early embryo development. Theriogenology 68 Suppl 1:S147–S155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.058
Hernández-Silva G, Caballero-Campo P, Chirinos M (2022) Sperm mRNAs as potential markers of male fertility. Reprod Biol 22(2):100636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100636
Krawetz SA, Kruger A, Lalancette C, Tagett R, Anton E, Draghici S, Diamond MP (2011) A survey of small RNAs in human sperm. Hum Reprod 26(12):3401–3412. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der329
Sendler E, Johnson GD, Mao S, Goodrich RJ, Diamond MP, Hauser R, Krawetz SA (2013) Stability, delivery and functions of human sperm RNAs at fertilization. Nucleic Acids Res 41(7):4104–4117. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt132
Selvaraju S, Parthipan S, Somashekar L, Kolte AP, Binsila K, Arangasamy B, A., Ravindra JP (2017) Occurrence and functional significance of the transcriptome in bovine (Bos taurus) spermatozoa. Sci Rep 7(1):42392. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42392
Das PJ, McCarthy F, Vishnoi M, Paria N, Gresham C, Li G, Kachroo P, Sudderth AK, Teague S, Love CC, Varner DD, Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T (2013) Stallion sperm transcriptome comprises functionally coherent coding and regulatory RNAs as revealed by microarray analysis and RNA-seq. PLoS ONE 8(2):e56535. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056535
Ostermeier GC, Miller D, Huntriss JD, Diamond MP, Krawetz SA (2004) Reproductive biology: delivering spermatozoan RNA to the oocyte. Nature 429(6988):154. https://doi.org/10.1038/429154a
Roszkowski M, Mansuy IM (2021) High efficiency RNA extraction from sperm cells using Guanidinium Thiocyanate supplemented with tris (2-Carboxyethyl) phosphine. Front cell Dev biology 9:648274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.648274
Parthipan S, Selvaraju S, Somashekar L, Kolte AP, Arangasamy A, Ravindra JP (2015) Spermatozoa input concentrations and RNA isolation methods on RNA yield and quality in bull (Bos taurus). Anal Biochem 482:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.022
Raval NP, Shah TM, George LB, Joshi CG (2019) Insight into bovine (Bos indicus) spermatozoal whole transcriptome profile. Theriogenology 129:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.037
Dewry RK, Mohanty TK, Nath S, Bhakat M, Yadav HP, Baithalu RK (2022) Modified methods for bovine sperm RNA isolation for consistent quality and RNA yield. bioRxiv, pp 2022–2005. preprint article
Kasimanickam VR, Kasimanickam RK (2019) An efficient approach for RNA extraction from boar sperm and seminal plasma. Bio-Protocol 9(13):e3284. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3284
Vijayalakshmy K, Kumar P, Virmani M, Pawaria S, Lalaji NS, Sharma P, Rajendran R, Yadav PS, Kumar D (2018) A novel combination of silane-coated silica colloid with hybrid RNA extraction protocol and RNA enrichment for downstream applications of spermatozoal RNA. Andrologia 50(6):e13030. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13030
Ibrahim S, Mahmoud KGM, Sosa ASA, Sakr AAM, El-Naby AAH, Nawito MF (2020) Establishment a protocol for total RNA isolation from buffalo fresh and frozen semen for molecular applications. Andrologia 52(4):e13526. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13526
Arias ME, Andara K, Briones E, Felmer R (2017) Bovine sperm separation by swim-up and density gradients (Percoll and BoviPure): effect on sperm quality, function and gene expression. Reprod Biol 17(2):126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2017.03.002
Galarza DA, Jara DI, Paredes EB, Samaniego JX, Méndez MS, Soria ME, Perea F, Muñoz-León E, Santiago-Moreno J (2022) BoviPure® density-gradient centrifugation procedure enhances the quality of fresh and cryopreserved dog epididymal spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci 242:107003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.107003
Das PJ, Paria N, Gustafson-Seabury A, Vishnoi M, Chaki SP, Love CC, Varner DD, Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T (2010) Total RNA isolation from stallion sperm and testis biopsies. Theriogenology 74(6):1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.04.023
Jain YC, Anand SR (1976) Fatty acids and fatty aldehydes of buffalo seminal plasma and sperm lipid. J Reprod Infertil 47(2):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0470261
Gilbert I, Bissonnette N, Boissonneault G, Vallée M, Robert C (2007) A molecular analysis of the population of mRNA in bovine spermatozoa. Reproduction 133(6):1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-06-0292
Barragán M, Martínez A, Llonch S, Pujol A, Vernaeve V, Vassena R (2015) Effect of ribonucleic acid (RNA) isolation methods on putative reference genes messenger RNA abundance in human spermatozoa. Andrology 3(4):797–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12053
Nouvel A, Laget J, Duranton F, Leroy J, Desmetz C, Servais MD, de Préville N, Galtier F, Nocca D, Builles N, Rebuffat S, Lajoix AD (2021) Optimization of RNA extraction methods from human metabolic tissue samples of the COMET biobank. Sci Rep 11(1):20975. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00355-x
Toni LS, Garcia AM, Jeffrey DA, Jiang X, Stauffer BL, Miyamoto SD, Sucharov CC (2018) Optimization of phenol-chloroform RNA extraction. MethodsX 5:599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.05.011
Acknowledgements
Receiving of Senior Research Fellowship of DBT by first author RV (DBT/2018/NDRI/996) is also acknowledged.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, (Grant number BT/PR30439/AAQ/1/743/ 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Rashi Vasisth, Ankita Gurao, Namita Kumari: investigation, methodology. Gautam Kumar, Anurag Kumar, Karpenahalli Ranganatha Sriranga: samples and animal data collection. Mahesh Shivanand Dige, Rajeev Anand Kumar Aggarwal: sample processing. Manishi Mukesh, Pawan Singh and Ranjit Singh Kataria: conceptualization of experiments, data analysis, review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Consent for publication
The manuscript has consent of all the authors for its publication in current format.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Vasisth, R., Gurao, A., Kumari, N. et al. Development and validation of most efficient RNA isolation method from buffalo bull spermatozoa. Mol Biol Rep 50, 6717–6727 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08593-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-023-08593-0