Skip to main content
Log in

Implantation associated divergence in neutrophil glucocorticoid and cysteine-X-cysteine receptor genes in cattle

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential roles of Interferon-tau (IFNT) and Progesterone (P4) in triggering pro- and anti-inflammatory responses during peri-implantation period were assessed in cows. An ex vivo study was done by isolating neutrophils from the animals post artificial insemination (AI) at defined intervals and analyzing the expression changes of Glucocorticoid receptor-α (GRα) and Interleukin-8 receptor (CXCR1) genes. An in vitro study was also done isolating neutrophils from prepubertal heifers subjecting them to IFNT and Progesterone P4 supplementation separately. We observed that from day 14 post Artificial Insemination, there is a significant up-regulation of neutrophil GRα and CXCR1 in pregnant and non-pregnant cows respectively. The in vitro study showed that IFNT significantly up-regulates GRα whereas P4 significantly up-regulates CXCR1. The total leukocyte count and neutrophil count were also significantly higher in non-pregnant cows. We conclude that IFNT efficiently mediates neutrophil immunosuppression during peri-implantation period in cows by interacting with Interleukin 8 receptor and can also exert ligand independent actions on GRα.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Dekel D, Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Racicot K, Mor G (2014) The role of inflammation for a successful implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol 72(2):141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kizaki K, Shichijo-Kizaki A, Furusawa T, Takahashi T, Hosoe M, Hashizume K (2013) Differential neutrophil gene expression in early bovine pregnancy. Reprod Biol Endcrinol 11:6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD, Zychlinsky A (2012) Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Ann Rev Immunol l30:459–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shirasuna K, Matsumoto H, Matsuyama S, Kimura K, Bollwein H, Miyamoto A (2015) Possible role of interferon tau on the bovine corpus luteum and neutrohils during the early pregnancy. Reproduction 150:217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nadeau-Vallee M, Obari D, Quiniou C, Lubell WD, Olson DM, Giard S, Chemtob S (2016) A critical role of interleukin-1 in preterm labor. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 28:37–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Korkaya H, Liu S, Wicha MS (2011) Regulation of cancer stem cells by cytokine networks: attacking cancers inflammatory routes. Clin Cancer Res 17(19):6125–6129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz-Topete D, Cidlowski JA (2015) One hormone, two actions: anti- and pro-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. NeuroImmunoModulation 22:20–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manjari P, Reddi S, Alhussien M, Mohammed S, De S, Mohanty AK, Sivalingam J, Dang AK (2016) Neutrophil gene dynamics and plasma cytokine levels in dairy cattle during peri-implantation period. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 173:44–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livak J, Thomas D (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartol FF, Roberts RM, Bazer FW, Lewis GS, Godkin JD, Thatcher WW (1985) Characterization of proteins produced in vitro by periattachment bovine conceptuses. Biol Reprod 32:681–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Emond V, Asselin E, Fortier MA, Murphy BD, Lambert RD (2000) Interferon-tau stimulates granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene expression in bovine lymphocytes and endometrial stromal cells. Biol Reprod 62(6):1728–1737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kontula K, Paavonen T, Luukkainen T, Andersso LC (1983) Binding of progestins to the glucocorticoid receptor. Correlation to their glucocorticoid-like effects on in vitro functions of human mononuclear leukocytes. Biochem Pharmacol 32(9):1511–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramamoorthy S, Cidlowsky JA (2013) Ligand-induced repression of the glucocorticoid receptor gene is mediated by an NCoR1 repression complex formed by long-range chromatin interactions with intragenic glucocorticoid response elements. Mol Cell Biol 33(9):1711–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bennesch MA, Picard D (2015) Minireview: tipping the balance: ligand-independent activation of steroid receptors. Mol Endocrinol 29(3):349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews L, Johnson J, Berry A, Trebble P, Cookson A, Spiller D et al (2011) Cell cycle phase regulates glucocorticoid receptor function. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Uddin S, Sassano A, Deb DK, Verma A, Majchrzak B, Rahman A, Malik AB, Fish EN, Platanias LC (2002) Protein kinas C-delta [PKC-delta] is activated by type I interferon and mediates phosphorylation of Stat1 on serine 727. J Biol Chem 277:14408–14416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Margaroli C, Tirouvanziam R (2016) Neutrophil plasticity enables the development of pathological microenvironments: implications for cystic fibrosis airway disease. Mol Cell Pediatr 3:38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Andzinski L, Kasnitz N, Stahnke S, Wu CF, Greke M, von Kocklitz-Blickwede M (2016) Type I IFNs induce anti-tumor polarization of tumor associated neutrophils in mice and human. Int J Cancer 138:1982–1993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manjari P, Hyder I, Kapoor S, Senthilanathan M, Dang AK (2018) Exploring the concentration-dependent actions of interferon-τ on bovine neutrophils to understand the process of implantation. J Cell Biochem 119(12):10087–10094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help of all technical and non-technical staff at National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal for assistance in sample collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology [Grant No. BT/PR8404/AAQ/1/548/2013; DATED: 20/06/2014], Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India which has also awarded INSPIRE fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PM performed the study, conducted experiments and analyzed the data, IH drafted and edited the manuscript, AKD conception and design of the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Manjari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manjari, P., Hyder, I. & Dang, A.K. Implantation associated divergence in neutrophil glucocorticoid and cysteine-X-cysteine receptor genes in cattle. Mol Biol Rep 46, 5493–5499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04865-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04865-w

Keywords

Navigation