To enhance purification yield of the carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) of P. aquimaris LBH-10, E. coli BL21/LBH-10 was constructed to produce the six histidine-tagged CMCase (CMCase with a His-tag). The purification yield of the CMCase with a His-tag produced by E. coli BL21/LBH-10 was 44.4%. The molecular weight of the CMCase with a His-tag was determined as 56 kDa. Its Km and Vmax were 7.4 g/L and 70.9 g/L min, respectively. The CMCase with a His-tag hydrolyzed avicel, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), filter paper, pullulan, and xylan but did not hydrolyze cellobiose and p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucopyranoside. The optimal temperature for reaction was 50 °C and more than 75% of its original activity was maintained at broad temperatures ranging from 20 to 70 °C after 24 h. The optimal pH was 4.0 and more than 60% of its original activity was maintained at pH ranging from 4.0 to 7.0. The activity of the CMCase with a His-tag was enhanced by CoCl2, KCl, PbCl2, RbCl2, and SrCl2 until the concentration of 100 mM, but inhibited by EDTA, HgCl2, MnCl2, and NiCl2. The characteristics of the CMCase with a His-tag produced by E. coli BL21/LBH-10 were little different from the CMCase without a His-tag, which seemed to resulted from the conformational change in the structure due to a His-tag. The purification yield of the CMCase with a His-tag using affinity chromatography from the cell broth after cell breakdown was proven to be more economic than that from the supernatant with its low concentration of cellulase.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This paper was financially supported by Dong-A University Research Fund.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of authors.
Henriksson H, Berglund LA (2007) Structure and properties of cellulose nanocomposite films containing melamine formaldehyde. J Appl Polym Sci 106:2817–2824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei GY, Lee YJ, Kim HJ, Jin IH, Lee JH, Lee JW (2010) Kinetic study on the pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of rice hull for the production of fermentable sugars. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:1471–1482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Gao W, Lee EJ, Lee SU, Li JH, Chung CH, Lee JW (2012) Enhanced carboxymethylcellulase production by a newly isolated marine bacterium, Cellulophga lytica LBH-14, using rice bran. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1415–1425Google Scholar
Kim BK, Kim HJ, Lee JW (2013) Rapid statistical optimization of cultural conditions for mass production of carboxymethylcellulase by a newly isolated marine bacterium, Bacillus velezensis A-68 from rice hulls. J Life Sci 23:757–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee BH, Kim BK, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW (2010) Industrial scale of optimization for the production of carboxymethylcellulase from rice bran by a marine bacterium, Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis A-53. Enzyme Microb Technol 46:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao W, Lee SU, Li JH, Lee JW (2013) Enhanced production of carboxymethylcellulase by Cellulophaga lytica LBH-14 in pilot-scale bioreactor under optimized conditions involved in dissolved oxygen. Kor J Chem Eng 30:1105–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim BK, Lee BH, Lee YJ, Jin IH, Chung CH, Lee JW (2009) Purification and characterization of carboxymethylcellulase isolated from a marine bacterium, Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis A-53. Enzyme Microb Technol 44:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee SU, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW (2014) Construction of recombinant Escherichia coli JM109/LBH-10 and comparison of its optimal condition for production of carboymethylcellulase with its wild type, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10. J Microb Biochem Technol 6:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee YJ, Kim BK, Lee BH, Jo KI, Lee NK, Chung CH, Lee YC, Lee JW (2008) Purification and characterization of cellulase produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DL-3 utilizing rice hull. Bioresou Technol 99:378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim JD, Lee DG, Lee SH (2018) Cloning, expression, and characterization of a thermotolerant β-agarase from Simiduia sp. SH-4. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 23:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franken KL, Hiemstra HS, van Meijgaarden KE, Subronto Y, Den Hartigh J, Ottenhoff TH, Drijfhout JW (2000) Purification of his-tagged proteins by immobilized chelate affinity chromatography: the benefits from the use of organic solvent. Protein Expr Purif 18:95–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Oshima T, Oshima C, Baba Y (2015) Selective extraction of histidine derivatives by metal affinity with a copper(II)-chelating ligand complex in an aqueous two-phase system. J Chromat B 990:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim MH, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW (2017) Comparison of optimal conditions for mass production of carboxymethylcellulase by Escherichia coli JM109/A-68 with other recombinant in pilot-scale bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 22:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resmussnen RS, Morrissey MT, Marine biotechnology for production of food ingredients. Adv Food Nut Res 52:237–292Google Scholar
Kim HJ, Gao W, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW (2010) Characterization of acidic carboxymethylcellulase produced by a marine microorganism, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10. J Life Sci 20:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee EJ, Lee BH, Kim BK, Lee JW JW (2013) Enhanced production of carboxymethylcellulase of a marine microorganism, Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis A-53 in a pilot-scaled bioreactor by a recombinant Escherichia coli JM109/A-53 from rice bran. Mol Biol Rep 40:3609–3621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim HJ, Lee YI, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW (2012) Optimization of salts in medium for production of carboxymethylcellulase by a psychrophilic marine bacterium, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 using two statistical methods. Kor J Chem Eng 29:84–391Google Scholar
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu J, Xia W (2006) Purification and characterization of a bifunctional enzyme with chitosanase and cellulase activity from commercial cellulase. Biochem Eng J 30:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brich PR, Sims PF, Broda P P (1995) Substrate dependent differential splicing of introns in the regions encoding the cellulose binding domains of two exocellobiohydrolase-like genes in Phanerochaete chryscsporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3741–3744Google Scholar
Seo HP, Jo KI, Son CW, Yang JK, Chung CH, Nam SW, Kim SK, Lee JW (2006) Continuous production of pullulan by Aureobasidium pullulans HP-2001 with feeding of high concentration of sucrose. J Microbiol Biothechnol 16:374–380Google Scholar
Kim MH, Kang DU, Lee JW (2016) Construction of recombinant Escherichia coli JM109/A-68 for production of carboxymethylcellulase and comparison of its production with its wild type, Bacillus velezensis A-68 in a pilot-scale bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 21:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akiba S, Kimura Y, Yamamoto K, Kumagai H (1995) Purification and characterization of a-protease-resistant cellulose from Aspergillus niger. J Ferment Bioeng 79:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu RK, Dube S, Dube DK (1988) Extracellular cellulolytic enzyme system of Aspergillus japnicus: 3. Isolation, purification, and characterization of multiple forms of endoglucanase. Enzyme Microb Technol 10:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra LP, Reyes F, Acevedo JP, Salazar O, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA (2008) Cloning and fusion expression of a cold-active lipase from marine Antarctic origin. Enzyme Microb Technol 42:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar