Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of Thiobacillus bacteria in agricultural soil in Iran using the 16S rRNA gene

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thiobacillus, as useful soil bacteria, plays an important role in sulfur cycling. The purpose of this study was to identify the species Thiobacillus thioparus, Thiobacillus novellas and Thiobacillus denitrificans in rainfed and irrigated lands soil in Ajabshir, Ilam, Qorveh, Rojintaak, Sonqor, Kermanshah and Research Farm of Razi University in Iran. Sampling was performed as randomized completely with three replications at depth of 0–30 cm. The Thiobacillus species were determined via 16S rRNA characteristics. The results of agarose gel electrophoresis indicated that T. thioparus was the highest amount in the irrigated land in Research Farm and its lowest amount was in the Rojintaak rainfed land. These species not found in four locations and conditions including the Ajabshir irrigated, Qorveh rainfed, Research Farm rainfed and Rojintaak irrigated lands. The results of the T. novellas indicated that this was found in Ilam irrigated, Qorveh rainfed, Research Farm irrigated, Rojintaak irrigated and Rojintaak rainfed lands. The highest and lowest amount of T. novellas was indicated in the Rojintaak and Ilam irrigated lands respectively. The T. denitrificans gene showed that this bacterium was observed only in both samples of Ajabshir. Our study showed that Thiobacillus was not detected in all of the soils. If sulfur fertilizer is given to the soil without this bacterium, it is necessary to use sulfur fertilizer with Thiobacillus bacteria inoculation for better sulfur oxidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Haneklaus S, Bloem E, Schnug E (2003) The global sulphur cycle and its links to plant environment. In: Yash P, Altaf A (eds) Sulphur in plants, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0289-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Soetan K, Olaiya C, Oyewole O (2010) The importance of mineral elements for humans, domestic animals and plants: a review. Afr J Food Sci 4(5):200–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waraich EA, Ahmad R, Ashraf M (2011) Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Aust J Crop Sci 5(6):764

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowdle P, Oremland R (1998) Microbial oxidation of elemental selenium in soil slurries and bacterial cultures. Environ Sci Technol 32(23):3749–3755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilderer PA, Flemming H-C, Davids L (2017) Microorganisms and their role in soil. In: Fundamentals and applications of bioremediation. Routledge, New York, pp 283–332

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kato S (2015) Biotechnological aspects of microbial extracellular electron transfer. Microb Environ 30(2):133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Camenzind T, Hättenschwiler S, Treseder KK, Lehmann A, Rillig MC (2018) Nutrient limitation of soil microbial processes in tropical forests. Ecol Monogr 88(1):4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang LN, Kuang JL, WS S (2016) Microbial ecology and evolution in the acid mine drainage model system. Trends Microbiol 24(7):581–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O’donnell C, Wiens N, Thompson J (2017) Process to produce a commercial soil additive prepared from compost and in situ oxidized sulphur and soil additive so formed. Google patents

  10. Kumar PS, Gunasundari E (2018) Bioremediation of heavy metals. In: Bioremediation: applications for environmental protection and management. Springer, New York, pp 165–195

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Bolan N, Xu Y, Mandal S, Gleeson D, Seshadri B, Zaman M, Barton L, Tang C (2016) Functional relationships of soil acidification, liming, and greenhouse gas flux. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 139. Elsevier, New York, pp 1–71

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hafsteinsdóttir EG, Camenzuli D, Rocavert AL, Walworth J, Gore DB (2015) Chemical immobilization of metals and metalloids by phosphates. Appl Geochem 59:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boden R (2017) Editorial: 115 years of sulfur microbiology. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364(6):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cárdenas JP, Ortiz R, Norris PR, Watkin E, Holmes DS (2015) Reclassification of ‘Thiobacillus prosperus’ Huber and Stetter 1989 as Acidihalobacter prosperus gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Ectothiorhodospiraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65(10):3641–3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beheshti Ale Agha A, Kahrizi D, Ahmadvand A, Bashiri H, Fakhri R (2017) Development of PCR primer systems for amplification of 16S-rDNA to detect of Thiobacillus spp. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 63(11):37–41. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2017.63.11.7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu W, Sun W, Lu Y, Li X, Xu P, Xie K, Sun L, Wu H (2018) Effect of Thiobacillus thioparus 1904 and sulphur addition on odour emission during aerobic composting. Bioresour Technology 249:254–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Solisio C, Lodi A (2002) Bioleaching of zinc and aluminium from industrial waste sludges by means of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Waste Manage 22(6):667–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gehrke T, Telegdi J, Thierry D, Sand W (1998) Importance of extracellular polymeric substances from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for bioleaching. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(7):2743–2747

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hays LE, Graham HV, Des Marais DJ, Hausrath EM, Horgan B, McCollom TM, Parenteau MN, Potter-McIntyre SL, Williams AJ, Lynch KL (2017) Biosignature preservation and detection in mars analog environments. Astrobiology 17(4):363–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu X-l, Fan H-w, Duan H, Zhang Z-z, Liu L-l, Liu X-x (2014) RAPD to study relatedness of 20 Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains. Chin J Nonferr Metals 2:037

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelley SO, Mirkin CA, Walt DR, Ismagilov RF, Toner M, Sargent EH (2014) Advancing the speed, sensitivity and accuracy of biomolecular detection using multi-length-scale engineering. Nat Nanotechnol 9(12):969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. López MM, Bertolini E, Olmos A, Caruso P, Gorris MT, Llop P, Penyalver R, Cambra M (2003) Innovative tools for detection of plant pathogenic viruses and bacteria. Int Microbiol 6(4):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Butler JM (2011) Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: methodology. Academic Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kawasaki S, Fratamico PM (2007) Applications of the polymerase chain reaction for detection, identification, and typing of food-borne microorganisms. In: Microbial food contamination, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 234–275

    Google Scholar 

  25. Di Capua F, Ahoranta SH, Papirio S, Lens PN, Esposito G (2016) Impacts of sulfur source and temperature on sulfur-driven denitrification by pure and mixed cultures of Thiobacillus. Process Biochem 51(10):1576–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Postgate JR (1984) The sulphate reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bergamo RF, Novo MTM, Veríssimo RV, Paulino LC, Stoppe NC, Sato MIZ, Manfio GP, Prado PI, Garcia O Jr, Ottoboni LM (2004) Differentiation of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and A. thiooxidans strains based on 16S–23S rDNA spacer polymorphism analysis. Res Microbiol 155(7):559–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Raheb J, Khoshroo H, Azimi A, Nasernejad B, Sanati M, Naghdi S, Arabnezhad M (2007) Isolation and characterization of a new Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans from the Aliabad copper mine in Yazd using 16S–23S spacer gene nucleotide sequencing method. J Sci Islam Repub Iran 18(3):209–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Y, Wan M, Zeng W, Xia J, Liu X, Qin W, Qiu G (2011) GyrB gene acts as a phylogenetic discriminator for bacterial diversity in acid mine drainage. J Environ Sci Eng 5(1):44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lefroy RD, Blair GJ (1997) Effect of nutrients and elemental sulfur particle size on elemental sulfur oxidation and the growth of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Aust J Agric Res 48(4):497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chapman S (1990) Thiobacillus populations in some agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 22(4):479–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wainwright M (1984) Sulfur oxidation in soils. In: Advances in agronomy, vol 37. Elsevier, New York, pp 349–396

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yousefi A, Allahverdi A, Hejazi P (2014) Accelerated biodegradation of cured cement paste by Thiobacillus species under simulation condition. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 86:317–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Babana AH, Samaké F (2011) Characterization of some agricultural soils: presence and activity of Tilemsi rock phosphate-solubilizing Thiobacilli. Br Microbiol Res J 1(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharifi Z, Safari Sinegani A (2015) Interactions between soil organisms and global climate change and application of meta-analysis in its interpretation: a systematic review. J Manage Syst 13(3):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gibson MJ, Trevors JT, Otten L (2006) Population estimates of Thiobacillus thioparus in composting biofilters by PCR analysis. J Microbiol Methods 65(2):346–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tabatabai M (1994) Sulfur oxidation and reduction in soils. In: Mickelson SH (ed) Methods soil analysis. Part 2-microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 1067–1078

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fernández N, Sierra-Alvarez R, Field JA, Amils R, Sanz JL (2008) Microbial community dynamics in a chemolithotrophic denitrification reactor inoculated with methanogenic granular sludge. Chemosphere 70(3):462–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Besharati H, Noorgholipour F, Malakouti M, Khavazi K, Lotfollahi M, Ardakani M (2001) Direct application of phosphate rock to Iran calcareous soils. In: International meeting on direct application of phosphate rock and related appropriate technology, Kuala Lumpur

Download references

Acknowledgements

Razi University has supported this research. Thanks to Zagros Bioidea Co., Razi University Incubator for all supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ABAA: execution research project, data analysis, manuscript preparation. DK: experimental design, data analysis, manuscript preparation. AA: data analysis, proofreading of the article. HB: experimental design, data analysis, proofreading of the article. RF: data analysis, proofreading of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Beheshti Ale Agha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they does not have a conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beheshti Ale Agha, A., Kahrizi, D., Ahmadvand, A. et al. Identification of Thiobacillus bacteria in agricultural soil in Iran using the 16S rRNA gene. Mol Biol Rep 45, 1723–1731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-018-4316-3

Keywords