Skip to main content

Evaluation of M307 of FUT1 gene as a genetic marker for disease resistance breeding of sutai pigs

Abstract

Alpha (1,2) fucosyltransferase (FUT1) gene has been identified as a candidate gene for controlling the expression of the receptor for ETEC F18. The genetic variations in the position of M307 nucleotide in open reading frame of FUT1 have been proposed as a marker for selecting ETEC F18 resistant pigs. The polymorphisms of M307 in FUT1 of breeding base group for ETEC F18 resistance of Sutai pigs (Duroc × Meishan) was detected and their correlations to some immune indexes, growth and development ability, carcass traits and meat quality were also analyzed, which aimed to investigate feasibility of further breeding for diseases resistance based on M307 of FUT1 for Sutai pigs. After digested by Hin6 I, M307 of FUT1 gene could be divided into three kinds of genotypes, AA, AG, and GG. The frequencies were 0.235, 0.609, and 0.156, respectively. The results indicated that Sutai pigs with the AA genotype in M307 of FUT1 gene not only have relatively strong general disease resistance ability in piglets, but also have higher growth and development ability and stable carcass traits and meat quality. It is entirely feasible to raise the new strains of Sutai pigs resistant to Escherichia coli F18 based on genetic marker of the M307 position in FUT1gene.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Imberechts H, De Greve H, Schlicker C, Bouchet H, Pohl P, Charlier G, Bertschinger H, Wild P, Vandekerckhove J, van Damme J (1992) Characterization of F107 fimbriae of Escherichia coli 107/86, which causes oedema disease in pigs and nucleotide sequence of F107 major fimbrial subunit gene, fedA. Infect Immun 60:1963–1971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benin AM, Ducher-Suchaux MF (1991) Relationship between virulence and adherence of various enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: strains to isolated intestinal epithelial cells from Chinese Meishan and European large white pigs. Am J Vet Res 52:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nagy B, Fekete PZ (1999) Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in farm animal. Vet Res 30:259–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogeli P, Meijerink E, Fries R, Stricker C, Bertschinger HU (1997) A molecular test for the detection of E. coli F18 receptors: a breakthrough in the struggle against oedema and post-weaning diarrhoea in swine. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 139:479–484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meijerink E, Fries R, Vogeli P, Masabanda J, Wigger G, Stricker C, Neuenschwander S, Bertschinger HU, Stranzinger G (1997) Two α (1,2) fucosyltransferase genes on porcine chromosome 6q11 are closely linked to the blood group inhibitor (S) and Escherichia coli F18 receptor (ECF18R) Loci. Mamm Genome 8:736–741

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan XM, Guo YM, Ding NS, Ren J, Huang LS (2004) Study on the genetic variation of a 1-fucosytransferase gene in different pig breed. Chin J Anim Sci 40:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shi QS, Huang SQ, Liu XC, He CQ, Jiang J (2003) Polymorphism of E. coli F18 receptor gene in different pig breeds. Acta Genet Sin 30:221–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu SL, Yuan ZW, Ju HP, Zhu GQ, Wang JY, Song CY, Chen GH (2006) Study on genetically susceptible piglets of small intestinal epithelium receptors to pathogenic F18 fimbrial Escherichia coli adhesion in vitro. Chin J Vet Sci 26:622–625

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bao WB, Wu SL, Musa HH, Zhu GQ, Chen GH (2008) Genetic variation at the alpha (1) fucosyltransferase (FUT1) gene in Asian wild boar and Chinese and Western commercial pig breeds. J Anim Breed Genet 125:427–430

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. CSHL Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang SQ, Zhang XC (2003) Introduction of a new modified Wright’s stain on blood smears. J Pract Med Technol 10:202

    Google Scholar 

  12. An LY (2000) Veterinary laboratory diagnosis. China Agricultural University Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu CM, Zhao GP, Wen J, Chen JL, Zheng MQ, Chen GH (2007) Diversity of immune traits between Chinese Beijing-You Chicken and White Leghorn. Acta Vet Et Zootech 38:1383–1388

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Z, Zhao XF, Jiang XL, Guo XL, Lv ZZ, Zhou HM, Xu NY (2011) Association of PPAR_2 polymorphisms with carcass and meat quality traits in a Pietrain × Jinhua F2 population. Genet Mole Bio 34:56–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma XY, Lin YC, Jiang ZY, Zheng CT, Zhou GL, Yu DQ, Cao T, Wang J, Chen F (2010) Dietary arginine supplementation enhances antioxidative capacity and improves meat quality of finishing pigs. Amino Acids 38:95–102

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Murrani WK, Kassab A, Al-Sam HZ, Al-Athari A (1997) Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a selection criterion for heat stress in domestic fowl. Poultry Sci 38:159–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevenson JR, Taylor R (1988) Effects of glucocorticoid and anti glucocorticoid hormones on leukocyte numbers and functions. Immunology 10:1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kassab AK, Elaiwi HH, Al-Murrani WK (2000) Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio under high and low temperature stress as a selection criterion for immune response against Newcastle antigen in chicken. J Agric Res 10:184–187

    Google Scholar 

  19. Latimer KS, Tang KN, Goodwin MA, Steffens WL, Brown J (1988) Leukocyte changes associated with acute inflammation in chickens. Avian Dis 32:760–772

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel PB, Gross WB, Cherry JA (1982) Correlated response of chickens to selection for production of antibody to sheep erythrocytes. Anim Blood Gr Biochem Genet 13:291–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dunnington EA, Martin A, Briles WE, Briles RW, Siegel PB (1986) Resistance to Marek’s disease in chickens selected for high and low antibody responses to sheep red blood cells. Arch Fur Geflugelkunde 50:94–96

    Google Scholar 

  22. He XP, Peng YB, Fan B, Li K, Zhu MJ, Peng ZZ (2006) Study on the detection of swine α-1 fucosytransferase polymorphism and its correlation with traits. Swine Prod 3:26–28

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang XP, Liu YG, Xiong YZ, Deng CY (2005) Effects of FUT1 gene on meat quality and carcass traits in swine. HEREDITAS (Beijing) 27:566–570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Genetically Modified Organisms Technology Major Project (2009ZX08006-004B), Science and Technology Supporting Project (agriculture) (BE2008364, BE2009330-2, BE2010371, and BE2010450) of Jiangsu Province and Suzhou city (SN201013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheng-long Wu.

Additional information

W. B. Bao and L. Ye contributed equally to this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, Wb., Ye, L., Zhu, J. et al. Evaluation of M307 of FUT1 gene as a genetic marker for disease resistance breeding of sutai pigs. Mol Biol Rep 39, 4223–4228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1208-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1208-1

Keywords

  • FUT1
  • Swine
  • Immune indexe
  • Production performance
  • Disease resistance breeding