Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A rapid genomic selection method combining Haseman-Elston (HE) model and algorithm for proven and young (APY)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

A Correction to this article was published on 13 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

To increase the predictive accuracy of genomic selection, large-scale phenotypic and genomic data is needed, which results in enormous consumption of computational resources, hampering the feasibility of genomic selection in return. In order to address computational limitation, a rapid genomic selection method HEAPY|A is developed in this study, combining Haseman-Elston (HE) model and algorithm for proven and young (APY). The proposed approach utilizes (i) HE regression to estimate the heritability and then (ii) APY to solve the inverse of the large matrix in best linear prediction (BLP); both HE and APY can reduce the computational cost compared with conventional techniques. When the size of a core population is half of that of a large training population, GBLUP|A, HEAPY|A, and HEBLP|A have similar performance in simulation studies (the core population can be further reduced if the training population size is further increased). When the size of a core population is half of that of a small training population, the predictive accuracy of HEAPY|A is a little lower than that of GBLUP|A and HEBLP|A in simulation study and empirical data—an Arabidopsis thaliana F2 population. HEAPY|A helps in predicting large genomic selection dataset with comparable accuracy without significant expense of time seen in traditional genomic selection algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Change history

  • 13 February 2020

    In the original version of this article the co-corresponding author name is missing.

  • 13 February 2020

    In the original version of this article the co-corresponding author name is missing.

References

  • Chen GB (2014) Estimating heritability of complex traits from genome-wide association studies using IBS-based Haseman-Elston regression. Front Genet 5:107

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GB (2016) On the reconciliation of missing heritability for genome-wide association studies. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1810–1816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard ME (2017) Can we make genomic selection 100% accurate? J Anim Breed Genet 134:287–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Chen GB (2017) A fast genomic selection approach for large genomic data. Theor Appl Genet 130:1277–1284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda Y, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Legarra A, Aguilar I, Lourenco DAL, Fragomeni BO, Lawlor TJ (2016) Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals. J Dairy Sci 99:1968–1974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal I (2016) Inexpensive computation of the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix in populations with small effective population size. Genetics 202:401–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I (2014) Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. J Dairy Sci 97:3943–3952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pocrnic I, Lourenco DAL, Masuda Y, Misztal I (2016) Dimensionality of genomic information and performance of the Algorithm for Proven and Young for different livestock species. Genet Sel Evol 48:82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomé PA, Bomblies K, Laitinen RAE, Yant L, Mott R, Weigel D (2011) Genetic architecture of flowering-time variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 188:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spindel JE, McCouch SR (2016) When more is better: how data sharing would accelerate genomic selection of crop plants. New Phytol 212:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Zhu D, Zhang Q (2014) Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. PNAS 111:12456–12461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771392 to GBC) and Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital Research Startup (ZRY2018A004 to GBC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL and GBC conceived and performed the study as well as wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hailan Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Chen, GB. A rapid genomic selection method combining Haseman-Elston (HE) model and algorithm for proven and young (APY). Mol Breeding 40, 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-1095-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-1095-z

Keywords

Navigation