Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Genetic characterization and field evaluation to recover parental phenotype in transgenic sugarcane: a step toward commercial release

  • Published:
Molecular Breeding Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane commercial variety RA 87-3 was transformed with a genetic construct harboring the epsps gene from Agrobacterium strain CP4 conferring tolerance to glyphosate and nptII gene for kanamycin selection. Transformed lines were multiplied in greenhouse, and herbicide tolerance was evaluated using different concentrations (3, 4, 8 and 16 l/ha) of glyphosate (Helm 48 % p/v). All herbicide-tolerant (HT) lines were field tested to confirm glyphosate tolerance and perform preliminary evaluations of phenotypic resemblance to parental cultivar. All transformed lines maintained herbicide tolerance, but many showed phenotypic changes and/or growth aberrations. Ten HT lines, showing close growth resemblance to RA 87-3, were analyzed using nine compulsory morphologic markers proposed by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) and 339 molecular markers. Out of the ten HT lines tested, six showed minor morphologic and genetic variations and were selected for field testing over two vegetative crop cycles (plant cane and first ratoon) at two production areas in Argentina. The six field-tested HT lines were found to be almost indistinguishable when comparing agronomic and industrial characteristics and chemical composition. Stable heritance of the CP4 epsps gene and glyphosate tolerance throughout different clonal generations were confirmed by RT-qPCR and Southern blot. Taking into account all results, two out of the six lines tested were selected for a possible commercial release. Our study confirms the utility of genetic transformation as a complementary tool to classical breeding procedures and highlights the usefulness of UPOV traits together with molecular markers for early selections of transgenic events that closely resemble their parental genotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aljanabi S, Forget L, Dookun A (1999) An improve and rapid protocol for the isolation of polysaccharide and polyphenol free sugarcane DNA. Plant Mol Biol Report 17:281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altpeter F, Baisakh N, Beachy R, Bock R, Capell T, Christou P, Daniell H, Datta K, Datta S, Dix PJ (2005) Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities. Mol Breed 15:305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwala S, Suman A, Arro JA, Veremis JC, Kimbeng CA (2006) Target region amplification polymorphism(TRAP) for assessing genetic diversity in sugarcane germoplasm collections. Crop Sci 46:448–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ANKOM (2006a) Acid detergent fiber in feeds filter bag technique. http://www.ssco.com.tw/Ankom/PDF_file/ADF%20Method%20A200pdf

  • ANKOM (2006b) Neutral detergent fiber in feeds filter bag technique. http://www.ssco.com.tw/Ankom/PDF_file/NDF%20Method%20A200.pdf

  • AOAC (2009) Single laboratory validation acceptance criteria (chemistry methods). Available via http://www.aoac.org/dietsupp6/Dietary-Supplement-web-site/SLV_criteria.pdf

  • Arencibia AD, Carmona ER, Cornide MT, Castiglione S, O’Relly J, Chinea A, Oramas P, Sala F (1999) Somaclonal variation in insect-resistant transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum hybrid) plants produced by cell electroporation. Transgenic Res 8(5):349–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arencibia A, Carmona E, Cornide M, Menéndez E, Molina P (2000) Transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Transgenic crops I. Springer, Berlin, pp 188–206

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Basnayake SW, Morgan TC, Wu L, Birch RG (2012) Field performance of transgenic sugarcane expressing isomaltulose synthase. Plant Biotechnol J 10(2):217–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower R, Birch RG (1992) Transgenic sugarcane plants via microprojectile bombardment. Plant J 2(3):409–416. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.1992.00409.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bower R, Elliott AR, Potier BA, Birch RG (1996) High-efficiency, microprojectile-mediated cotransformation of sugarcane, using visible or selectable markers. Mol Breed 2(3):239–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes G, Barfoot P (2012) GM crops: global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2010. PG Economics Ltd http://www.pgeconomicscouk/page/33/global-impact-2012. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • CERA (2008) GM crop database. Center for Environmental Risk Assessment (CERA). ILSI Research Foundation, Washington, DC. http://cera-gmc.org/GMCropDatabase

  • Di Rienzo J, Casanoves F, Balzarini M, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo C (2009) InfoStat. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. [Links]

  • Dillon SL, Shapter FM, Henry RJ, Cordeiro G, Izquierdo L, Lee LS (2007) Domestication to crop improvement: genetic resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae). Ann Bot 100(5):975–989

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enríquez-Obregón GA, Vázquez-Padrón RI, Prieto-Samsonov DL, Gustavo A, Selman-Housein G (1998) Herbicide-resistant sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Planta 206(1):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falco M, Neto AT, Ulian E (2000) Transformation and expression of a gene for herbicide resistance in a Brazilian sugarcane. Plant Cell Rep 19(12):1188–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ, Vain P, Jones MW, McMullen MD (1992) Development of the particle inflow gun for DNA delivery to plant cells. Plant Cell Rep 11(7):323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franks T, Birch R (1991) Gene transfer into intact sugarcane cells using microprojectile bombardment. Funct Plant Biol 18(5):471–480. doi:10.1071/PP9910471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo-Meagher M, Irvine J (1996) Herbicide resistant transgenic sugarcane plants containing the bar gene. Crop Sci 36(5):1367–1374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert R, Gallo-Meagher M, Comstock J, Miller J, Jain M, Abouzid A (2005) Agronomic evaluation of sugarcane lines transformed for resistance to strain E. Crop Sci 45(5):2060–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert R, Glynn N, Comstock J, Davis M (2009) Agronomic performance and genetic characterization of sugarcane transformed for resistance to sugarcane yellow leaf virus. Field crops Res 111(1):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green JM (2009a) Evolution of glyphosate-resistant crop technology. Weed Sci 57(1):108–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green JM (2009b) Review of glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicide crop resistance and resistant weed management. Weed Technol 21(2):547–558

  • Grivet L, Glaszmann J, Arruda P (2001) Sequence polymorphism from EST data in sugarcane: a fine analysis of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase genes. Genet Mol Biol 24(1–4):161–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta O (1960) Weed control in sugarcane. PANS (C) 14(2):154

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy JW, Bischoff KP, Milligan SB, Gravois KA (2003) Effect of tissue culture explant source on sugarcane yield components. Euphytica 129(2):237–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim A (1984) Weed competition and control in sugarcane. Weed Res 24(4):227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MA, Anderson DJ, Birch RG (2013) Comparison of Agrobacterium and particle bombardment using whole plasmid or minimal cassette for production of high-expressing, low-copy transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 22(1):143–151. doi:10.1007/s11248-012-9639-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James C (2013) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce P, Hermann S, O’Connell A, Dinh Q, Shumbe L, Lakshmanan P (2014) Field performance of transgenic sugarcane produced using Agrobacterium and biolistics methods. Plant Biotechnol J 12:411–424. doi:10.1111/pbi.12148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibbrandt N, Snyman S (2001) Initial field testing of transgenic glufosinate ammonium-resistant sugarcane. In: Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, 2001, pp 108–111

  • Leibbrandt NB, Snyman SJ (2003) Stability of gene expression and agronomic performance of a transgenic herbicide-resistant sugarcane line in South Africa. Crop Sci 43(2):671–677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Quiros CF (2001) Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), a new marker system based on a simple PCR reaction: its application to mapping and gene tagging in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 103(2–3):455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenthaler HK (1987) [34] Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of Relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera A, Paz N, Díaz E, Perera F, Sepúlveda Tusek M, Filippone M, Castagnaro A (2010) Proyecto Vitroplantas: La producción de caña semilla de alta calidad comienza en el laboratorio Publicación Especial N°40 Proyecto Vitroplantas: producción de caña semilla de alta calidad Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC)

  • Olea I, Sabaté S, Vinciguerra H (2009) Manejo de malezas. Manual del cañero, Romero, RE. In: Digonzelli PA, Scandaliaris J (edn) Estación experimental agroindustrial obispo colombres (EEAOC)

  • Perera M, Arias M, Costilla D, Luque A, García M, Romero CD, Racedo J, Ostengo S, Filippone M, Cuenya M (2012) Genetic diversity assessment and genotype identification in sugarcane based on DNA markers and morphological traits. Euphytica 185(3):491–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapulana T, Bouwer G (2013) Toxicity to Eldana saccharina of a recombinant Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strain carrying a truncated Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac gene. Afr J Microbiol Res 7(14):1207–1214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala F, Arencibia A, Castiglione S, Christou P, Zheng Y, Han Y (1999) Molecular and field analysis of somaclonal variation in transgenic plants. In: Altman A, Ziv M, Izhar S (eds) Plant biotechnology and in vitro biology in the 21st century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 259–262

  • Sneath PH, Sokal RR (1973a) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco

  • Sneath PH, Sokal RR (1973b) Numerical taxonomy. Theory Appl Genet 93:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PWJ, Fraser TA, Ko H-L, Henry RJ (1995) RAPD analysis of sugarcane during tissue culture. In: Terzi M, Cella R, Falavigna A (eds) Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Kluwer Academic Int., Dordrecht, pp 241–246

  • UPOV UftPoNVoP (2005) Draft test guidelines for sugarcane. http://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/es/tg186.pdf

  • Vellicce G, Noguera A, Filippone M, Castagnaro A (2011) Implementación de un sistema de biobalística para la transformación genética de plantas en la Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC). Av Agroind (Argentina) 32(1):31–34

  • Vickers J, Grof C, Bonnett G, Jackson P, Morgan T (2005) Effects of tissue culture, biolistic transformation, and introduction of PPO and SPS gene constructs on performance of sugarcane clones in the field. Crop Pasture Sci 56(1):57–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) for financial support of the studies conducted in this project. MPF and APC are CONICET members; JR is CONICET fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Tecnología Agroindustrial del Noroeste Argentino (ITANOA), Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Av. William Cross 3150, C.P. T4101XAC, Las Talitas, Tucumán, República Argentina

    Aldo Noguera, Ramón Enrique, María Francisca Perera, Santiago Ostengo, Josefina Racedo, Diego Costilla, Silvia Zossi, María Inés Cuenya, María Paula Filippone, Björn Welin & Atilio Pedro Castagnaro

Authors
  1. Aldo Noguera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramón Enrique
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Francisca Perera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Santiago Ostengo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Josefina Racedo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Diego Costilla
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Silvia Zossi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. María Inés Cuenya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. María Paula Filippone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Björn Welin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Atilio Pedro Castagnaro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Björn Welin or Atilio Pedro Castagnaro.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11032_2015_300_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Electronic Supplementary material: Quantitation of total chlorophyll in transgenic lines and control plant after glyphosate treatment. a) Samples of two representative transgenic lines (28 and 37) were evaluated after 3 l/ha glyphosate application from 0 to 4 weeks. Non-transformed RA87-3 plants were used as control. Similar results were obtained at 4 and 8 l/ha (data not shown). (JPEG 9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noguera, A., Enrique, R., Perera, M.F. et al. Genetic characterization and field evaluation to recover parental phenotype in transgenic sugarcane: a step toward commercial release. Mol Breeding 35, 115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0300-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0300-y

Keywords