Molecular Breeding

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 135–143 | Cite as

Quantitative genetics: past and present

Article

Abstract

Most characters of economic importance in plants and animals, and complex diseases in humans, exhibit quantitative variation, the genetics of which has been a fascinating subject of study since Mendel’s discovery of the laws of inheritance. The classical genetic basis of continuous variation based on the infinitesimal model of Fisher and mostly using statistical methods has since undergone major modifications. The advent of molecular markers and their extensive mapping in several species has enabled detection of genes of metric characters known as quantitative trait loci (QTL). Modeling the high-resolution mapping of QTL by association analysis at the population level as well as at the family level has indicated that incorporation of a haplotype of a pair of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the model is statistically more powerful than a single marker approach. High-throughput genotyping technology coupled with micro-arrays has allowed expression of thousand of genes with known positions in the genome and has provided an intermediate step with mRNA abundance as a sub-phenotype in the mapping of genotype onto phenotype for quantitative traits. Such gene expression profiling has been combined with linkage analysis in what is known as eQTL mapping. The first study of this kind was on budding yeast. The associated genetic basis of protein abundance using mass spectrometry has also been attempted in the same population of yeast. A comparative picture of transcript vs. protein abundance levels indicates that functionally important changes in the levels of the former are not necessarily reflected in changes in the levels of the latter. Genes and proteins must therefore be considered simultaneously to unravel the complex molecular circuitry that operates within a cell. One has to take a global perspective on life processes instead of individual components of the system. The network approach connecting data on genes, transcripts, proteins, metabolites etc. indicates the emergence of a systems quantitative genetics. It seems that the interplay of the genotype-phenotype relationship for quantitative variation is not only complex but also requires a dialectical approach for its understanding in which ‘parts’ and ‘whole’ evolve as a consequence of their relationship and the relationship itself evolves.

Keywords

Quantitative characters Genetic basis Molecular markers Quantitative trait loci (QTL) High-resolution mapping Power of statistical modeling eQTL mRNA abundance Protein abundance Systems quantitative genetics Dialectical approach 

References

  1. Brem RB, Yvert G, Clinton R, Kruglyak L (2002) Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast. Science 296:752–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. DeCook R, Lall S, Nettleton D, Howell SH (2006) Genetic regulation of gene expression during shoot development in Arabidopsis. Genetics 172:1155–1164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan RZ, Jung JS, Jin L (2006) High-resolution association mapping of quantitative trait loci: a population-based approach. Genetics 172:663–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Foss EJ, Radulovic D, Shaffer SA, Ruderfer DM, Bedalov A, Goodlett DR, Kruglyak L (2007) Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast. Nat Genet 39:1369–1375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jansen RC, Nap J-P (2001) Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 17(7):388–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, Sauna ZE, Calcagno AM, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM (2007) A “silent” polymorphism in the MDRI gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315:525–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lan H, Stoehr JP, Nadler ST, Schueler KL, Yandell BS, Attie AD (2003) Dimension reduction for mapping mRNA abundance as quantitative traits. Genetics 164:1607–1614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Luo ZW, Thompson R, Woolliams JA (1997) A population genetics model of marker-assisted selection. Genetics 146:1173–1183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo ZW, Tao SH, Zeng Z-B (2000) Inferring linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations. Genetics 156:457–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Morley M et al (2004) Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature 430:743–747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Narain P (2006) Dialectical agriculture. Natl Acad Sci Lett 29:253–260Google Scholar
  12. Narain P (2007) A theoretical treatment of interval mapping of a disease gene using transmission disequilibrium tests. J Biosci 32(7):1317–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Narain P (2009) Transmission Disequilibrium Test (TDT) for a pair of linked marker loci. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(5):1883–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Newman SA, Bhat R (2007) Genes and proteins: dogmas in decline. J Biosci 32(6):1041–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ray LB (2008) Getting your loops straight. Science 322:389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rockman MV (2008) Reverse engineering the genotype-phenotype map with natural genetic variation. Nature 456:738–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rockman MV, Kruglyak L (2006) Genetics of global gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 7:862–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schadt EE, Monks SA, Drake TA, Lusis AJ, Che N, Colinayo V, Ruff TG, Milligan SB, Lamb JR, Cavet G, Linsley PS, Mao M, Stoughton RB, Friend SH (2003) Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature 422:297–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Spielman RS, Mcginnis RE, Ewens WJ (1993) Transmission tests for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52:506–516PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IASRINew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations