Molecular Breeding

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 159–172 | Cite as

Identification of genes involved in the response of leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris to drought stress

  • Tatjana KavarEmail author
  • Marko Maras
  • Marjetka Kidrič
  • Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič
  • Vladimir Meglič


Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important crop from the Fabaceae family that is cultivated worldwide for human consumption. It is also widely exposed to drought. The identification of genes whose expression is altered under conditions of drought is an important first step towards understanding the response of this species. Such a study has recently been published on roots of P. vulgaris (Torres et al. 2006, Plant Sci 171:300–307) and a complementary study is here reported on leaves. 19-day-old plants of 8 cultivars grown in a growth chamber and 21-day-old plants of four of these cultivars grown in a greenhouse under conditions nearer to those in the field, were subjected to progressive water withdrawal. Changes in gene expression in their leaves at different levels of dehydration were identified by differential display reverse transcriptase PCR and confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. The levels of 15 transcripts were changed significantly (P < 0.05) in all cultivars under both growth conditions, 8 being increased and seven decreased. All these transcripts were related by blastp search to known plant proteins. At least six transcripts corresponded to those whose expression is altered under drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Five of the genes identified have not previously been reported as being influenced by drought. The identified genes were different from those influenced by drought in roots of P. vulgaris. Only minor differences in expression of these 15 genes were found between the different cultivars.


Common bean Differential display Gene expression analysis Quantitative PCR Drought Phaseolus vulgaris 



The authors are grateful to Professor Roger H. Pain for careful and critical reading of the manuscript and for his many useful suggestions. Thanks are also due to Dr. Kristina Ugrinović and Boštjan Lipavic for carrying out the greenhouse experiment. The work was supported by the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia, grant J4-6355.


  1. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson KA, Kohorn BD (2001) Inactivation of Arabidopsis SIP1 leads to reduced levels of sugars and drought tolerance. Plant J 158:1215–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubry C, Morère-Le Paven MC, Chateigner-Boutin AL et al (2003) A gene encoding a germin-like protein, identified by cDNA-AFLP approach, is specifically expressed during germination of Phaseolus vulgaris. Planta 217:466–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becerra Velasquez VLB, Gepts P (1994) RFLP diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in its centers of origin. Genome 37:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boominathan P, Shukla R, Kumar A et al (2004) Long term transcript accumulation during the development of dehydration adaptation. Plant Physiol 135:1608–1620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray EA (2004) Genes commonly regulated by water-deficit stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 55:2331–2341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castrillo M (1992) Sucrose metabolism in bean plants under water deficit. J Exp Bot 43:1557–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charon C, Sousa C, Crespi M et al (1999) Alteration of enod40 expression modifies Medicago truncatula root nodule development induced by Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Cell 11:1953–1966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinchilla D, Merchan F, Megias M et al (2003) Ankyrin protein kinases: a novel type of plant kinase gene whose expression is induced by osmotic stress in alfalfa. Plant Mol Biol 51:555–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colmenero-Flores JM, Campos F, Garciarrubio A et al (1997) Characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris cDNA clones responsive to water deficit: identification of a novel late embryogenesis abundant-like protein. Plant Mol Biol 35:393–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cruz de Carvalho MH, d’Arcy-Lameta A, Roy-Macauley H et al (2001) Aspartic protease in leaves of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp): enzymatic activity, gene expression and relation to drought susceptibility. FEBS Lett 492:242–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz de Carvalho MH, Luffray D, Louguet P (1998) Comparison of the physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and Vigna unguiculata cultivars when submitted to drought conditions. Environ Exp Bot 40:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doczi R, Kondrak M, Kovacs G et al (2005) Conservation of the drought-inducible DS2 genes and divergences from their ASR paralogues in solanaceous species. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf D, Fisher AG, Merkenschlager M (1997) Rational primer design greatly improves differential display-PCR (DD-PCR). Nucleic Acids Res 25:2239–2240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gupta AK, Kaur N (2005) Sugar signalling and gene expression in relation to carbohydrate metabolism under abiotic stresses in plants. J Biosci 30:761–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermann (Corbett Research), Pffafl (2005) New Standalone Software for Gene Expression Analysis. Cited 9 Aug 2006Google Scholar
  17. Hieng B, Ugrinovič K, Šuštar-Vozlič J et al (2004) Different classes of proteases are involved in the response to drought of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivars differing in sensitivity. J Plant Physiol 161:519–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsiao TC, Xu LK (2000) Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: biophysical analysis and relation to water transport. J Exp Bot 51:1595–1616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iusem ND, Bartholomew DM, Hitz WD et al (1993) Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) transcript induced by water deficit and ripening. Plant Physiol 102:1353–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim JY, Mahe A, Brangeon J, Prioul JL (2000) A maize vacuolar invertase, IVR2, is induced by water stress. Organ/tissue specificity and diurnal modulation of expression. Plant Physiol 124:71–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirch HH, Schlingensiepen S, Kotchoni S et al (2005) Detailed expression analysis of selected genes of the aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) gene superfamily in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 57:315–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kizis D, Lumbreras V, Pages M (2001) Role of AP2/EREBP transcription factors in gene regulation during abiotic stress. FEBS Lett 498:187–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kotchoni SO, Bartels D (2003) Water stress induces the up-regulation of a specific set of a genes in plants: aldehyde dehydrogenases as an example. Bulg J Plant Physiol Special Issue:37–51Google Scholar
  24. Liang P, Zhu W, Zhang X et al (1994) Differential display using one-base anchored oligo-dT primers. Nucleic Acids Res 22:5763–5764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu XD, Shen YG (2004) NaCl-induced phosphorylation of light harvesting chlorophyll a/b proteins in thylakoid membranes from the halotolerant green alga, Dunaliella salina. FEBS Lett 569:337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH (2004) CD-search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res 32:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mikolajczyk M, Awotunde OS, Muszynska G et al (2000). Osmotic stress induces rapid activation of a salicylic acid-induced protein kinase and a homologue of protein kinase ASK1 in tobacco cells. Plant Cell 12:165–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patnaik D, Khurana P (2001). Germins and germin like proteins: an overview. Indian J Exp Biol 39:191–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pfaffl MW, Horgan GW, Dempfle L (2002) Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in Real-Time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 30:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramírez M, Graham MA, Blanco-López L et al (2005) Sequencing and analysis of common Bean ESTs building a foundation for functional genomics. Plant Physiol 137:1211–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  33. Schweizer P, Christoffel A, Dudler R (1999) Transient expression of members of the germin-like gene family in epidermal cells of wheat confers disease resistance. Plant J 20:541–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J et al (2002) Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 3:279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shao HB, Liang ZS, Shao MA (2005) LEA proteins in higher plants: structure, function, gene expression and regulation. Colloid Surf 45:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sugiharto B, Ermawati N, Mori H et al (2002) Identification and characterization of a gene encoding drought-inducible protein localizing in the bundle sheath cell of sugarcane. Plant Cell Physiol 43:350–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Šuštar-Vozlič J, Maras M, Javornik B et al (2006) Genetic diversity and origin of Slovene common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm as revealed by AFLP markers and phaseolin analysis. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:242–249Google Scholar
  38. Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S et al (2002) Important roles of drought- and cold-inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 29:417–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tezara W, Mitchell VJ, Driscoll SD et al (1999) Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature 401:914–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tiwari A, Kumar P, Singh S et al (2005) Carbonic anhydrase in relation to higher plants. Photosynthetica 43:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Torres GAM, Lelandais-Briere C, Besin E et al (2003) Characterization of the expression of Phaseolus vulgaris OCT1, a dehydration-regulated gene that encodes a new type of phloem transporter. Plant Mol Biol 51:341–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Torres GAM, Pflieger S, Corre-Menguy F et al (2006) Identification of novel drought-related mRNAs in common bean roots by differential display RT-PCR. Plant Sci 171:300–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White JW, Singh SP (1991) Breeding for adaptation to drought. In: van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O (eds) Common beans: research for crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, CIAT, Cali, pp 501–551Google Scholar
  44. Wu J, Cosgrove DJ (2000) Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins. J Exp Bot 51:1543–1553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang CY, Chen YC, Jauh GY et al (2005) A Lily ASR protein involves abscisic acid signaling and confers drought and salt resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 139:836–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatjana Kavar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marko Maras
    • 1
  • Marjetka Kidrič
    • 2
  • Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič
    • 1
  • Vladimir Meglič
    • 1
  1. 1.Agricultural Institute of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Jožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations