Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring implicit theories of shame: developing a new scale assessing shame-related beliefs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shame is conventionally regarded as a negative emotion with maladaptive effects. However, the rich connotations of the word shame suggest an adaptive function too (e.g., in restraining people from engaging in shame-inducing behaviors). This is the first research that examines the enhancing beliefs about sense of shame (i.e., utility of sense of shame) and debilitating beliefs about shame (i.e., consequences of shame), with a tool developed to assess these two beliefs among two independent samples of Chinese undergraduate students (N = 585 and 386). Findings confirmed the two-factor structure of the scale with acceptable internal consistency. Only the enhancing beliefs about sense of shame were positively correlated with adaptive shame coping and reappraisal emotion regulation, whereas only debilitating beliefs about shame were positively correlated with suppression emotion regulation. By exploring lay theories of shame and their potential differential associations with individuals’ resilience in the face of shame, this newly developed scale sheds light on multifaceted aspects of shame-related beliefs and coping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by [University of Macau] (Grant number [MYRG2016-00238-FSS]).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Y. Li] and [V. Y. K. Tao]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Y. Li], [V. Y. K. Tao], and [A. M. S. Wu], and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivienne Y. K. Tao.

Ethics declarations

Declarations

This research was partially based on first author’s doctoral dissertation under the supervision of second and third authors.

This research has been presented at the 32nd International Congress of Psychology.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Department of Psychology, University of Macau. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Tao, V.Y.K. & Wu, A.M.S. Exploring implicit theories of shame: developing a new scale assessing shame-related beliefs. Motiv Emot 47, 461–475 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10008-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10008-3

Keywords

Navigation