Skip to main content
Log in

Empirical testing of an alternative modeling of the self-determination continuum

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-determination theory (SDT) proposes various types of motivation which fall onto a continuum of self-determination. Some computational techniques allow the estimation of a global score of self-determination, with bifactor-ESEM modeling being a popular estimation method. However, this approach has shortcomings, including changing conceptual interpretation of both general and specific factors. In this study, we applied the bifactor S – 1 modeling strategy to estimate the continuum and explore its potential contribution. By estimating all specific factors except for intrinsic motivation, this model anchors the general factor in intrinsic motivation which is prototypical of self-determination. Tested with five samples of students from elementary school to university (Ntotal > 4000), the bifactor S – 1 modeling strategy was empirically supported, and its general factor yielded a stronger prediction of students’ outcomes (e.g., grades, anxiety) compared to the previously advocated bifactor-ESEM model. The bifactor S – 1 model also explains outcomes with high precision, and its conceptual concordance with SDT makes it easily interpretable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This percentage was obtained by averaging, across all studies that measured grades, the ratios for which the numerator was the beta of the prediction of grades from the G-factor of the S – 1 model as and the denominator was the beta of the prediction of grades from the G-factor of the symmetrical model. Hence, a ratio of 1.1 would mean a 10% stronger prediction.

References

  • Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 482–497. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS &CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovftj&AN=00004760-200905000-00019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau, J. S., Gareau, A., Guay, F., & Mageau, G. A. (2022). Investigating how autonomy‐supportive teaching moderates the relation between student honesty and premeditated cheating. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12444

  • Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Guay, F. (2021). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 003465432110424. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426

  • Burns, G. L., Geiser, C., Servera, M., Becker, S. P., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2019). Application of the Bifactor S – 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 2019, 48:7(7), 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10802-019-00608-4. 48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carballeira, Y., Dumont, P., Borgacci, S., Rentsch, D., de Tonnac, N., Archinard, M., & Andreoli, A. (2007). Criterion validity of the French version of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in a hospital department of internal medicine. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 80(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608306X103641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M. A. K. (2012). Toward a tripartite model of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00757.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemolli, E., & Gagne, M. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575–585. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS &CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovftp&AN=00012030-201406000-00020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. V. (2000). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation in schools: A reconciliation. 9(1), 22–25.https://doi-Org.Acces.Bibl.Ulaval.ca/10.1111/1467-8721.00052. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00052

  • Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/H0030644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum

  • Edwards, J. R. (2001). Ten difference score myths: Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/109442810143005, 4(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810143005

  • Forbes, M. K., Greene, A. L., Levin-Aspenson, H. F., Watts, A. L., Hallquist, M., Lahey, B. B., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Tackett, J. L., Waldman, I. D., Wright, A. G. C., Caspi, A., Ivanova, M., Kotov, R., Samuel, D. B., Eaton, N. R., & Krueger, R. F. (2021). Three recommendations based on a comparison of the reliability and validity of the predominant models used in research on the empirical structure of psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/ABN0000533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Güntert, S. T., Halvari, H., Indiyastuti, D. L., Johnson, P. A., Molstad, M. H., Naudin, M., Ndao, A., Olafsen, A. H., Roussel, P., Wang, Z., & Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn, A. C. (2018). Basic psychological need satisfaction toward learning: A longitudinal test of mediation using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilal, F. G., Chandani, K., Gilal, R. G., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, W. G., & Channa, N. A. (2020). Towards a new model for green consumer behaviour: A self-determination theory perspective. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/SD.2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, W., Bureau, J. S., Poellhuber, B., & Guay, F. (2021). Predicting college students' psychological distress through basic psychological need-relevant practices by teachers, peers, and the academic program. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09892-4

  • Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Huart, I., Odry, D., Chevalier, S., Coillot, H., & Fouquereau, E. (2018). Self-determination trajectories during police officers’ vocational training program: A growth mixture analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 109, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2018.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020). A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 988–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOOP.12322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, F., Senécal, C., Gauthier, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting career indecision: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of counseling psychology, 50, 165–177. https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.165

  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., Roy, A., & Litalien, D. (2010). Academic self-concept, autonomous academic motivation, and academic achievement: Mediating and additive effects. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.08.001

  • Guay, F., Ratelle, C., Larose, S., Vallerand, R. J., & Vitaro, F. (2013). The number of autonomy-supportive relationships: Are more relationships better for motivation, perceived competence, and achievement?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.005

  • Guay, F., & Bureau, J. S. (2018). Motivation at school: Differentiation between and within school subjects matters in the prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.05.004

  • Guay, F., Morin, A. J. S., Litalien, D., Howard, J. L., & Gilbert, W. (2021). Trajectories of self-determined motivation during the secondary school: A growth mixture analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/EDU0000482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hand, E. D., & Lonigan, C. J. (2021). Examining the Relations between Preschooler’s Externalizing Behaviors and Academic Performance Using an S-1 Bifactor Model. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10802-021-00861-6/TABLES/3

  • Heinrich, M., Zagorscak, P., Eid, M., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2020). Giving G a Meaning: An application of the bifactor-(S-1) approach to realize a more symptom-oriented modeling of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Assessment, 27(7), 1429–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118803738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M., Geiser, C., Zagorscak, P., Burns, G. L., Bohn, J., Becker, S. P., Eid, M., Beauchaine, T. P., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2021). On the Meaning of the “ P Factor” in Symmetrical Bifactor Models of Psychopathology: Recommendations for Future Research From the Bifactor-(S – 1) Perspective. Assessment, 107319112110602. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211060298

  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125

  • Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Bureau, J. S. (2020a). The tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30-year retrospective and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1268–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Morin, A. J. S. (2020b). Putting the pieces together: reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09838-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Van den Broeck, A., Guay, F., Chatzisarantis, N., Ntoumanis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2020c). A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory. Motivation and Emotion 2020c, 44:4(4), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11031-020-09831-9. 44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(81)90033-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Otis, N., Powers, T. A., Pelletier, L. G., & Gagnon, H. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1201–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6494.2008.00519.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1525-1497.2001.016009606.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. 33(2), 181–220. http://Dx.Doi.Org.Acces.Bibl.Ulaval.ca/10.1207/S15327906mbr3302_1. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3302_1

  • Micoulaud-Franchi, J. A., Lagarde, S., Barkate, G., Dufournet, B., Besancon, C., Trébuchon-Da Fonseca, A., Gavaret, M., Bartolomei, F., Bonini, F., & McGonigal, A. (2016). Rapid detection of generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in epilepsy: Validation of the GAD-7 as a complementary tool to the NDDI-E in a French sample. Epilepsy & Behavior, 57, 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YEBEH.2016.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock, & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Information Age Publishing, Inc

  • Morin, A. J. S. (2021). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd editio). Guilford

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Gilford Press

  • Sebire, S. J., Jago, R., Fox, K. R., Edwards, M. J., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Testing a self-determination theory model of children’s physical activity motivation: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2013 10:1, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-111

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298245010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHINTE.166.10.1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thöne, A. K., Junghänel, M., Görtz-Dorten, A., Dose, C., Hautmann, C., Jendreizik, L. T., Treier, A. K., Vetter, P., von Wirth, E., Banaschewski, T., Becker, K., Brandeis, D., Dürrwächter, U., Geissler, J., Hebebrand, J., Hohmann, S., Holtmann, M., Huss, M., Jans, T., & Döpfner, M. (2021). Disentangling symptoms of externalizing disorders in children using multiple measures and informants. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/PAS0001053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Bőthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2021). Toward an Improved Understanding of Work Motivation Profiles. Applied Psychology, 70(3), 986–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/APPS.12256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Antczak, D., Lee, J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, P., Valois, P., Frenette, E., & Sévigny, S. (1996). Non-parametric analyses of the psychological distress questionnaire of Santé-Québec [Analyses d’items non-paramétriques du questionnaire de détresse psychologique de l’enquête Santé Québec]. Communication Présentée Au XIXe Congrès Annuel de La SQRP. Université Du Québec à Trois-Rivières

  • Wallhead, T., Garn, A. C., Vidoni, C., & Youngberg, C. (2013). Game Play Participation of Amotivated Students During Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32(2), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1123/JTPE.32.2.149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien S. Bureau.

Ethics declarations

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose. This study was made possible through funding from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et culture to the first author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bureau, J.S., Guay, F., Plamondon, A. et al. Empirical testing of an alternative modeling of the self-determination continuum. Motiv Emot 47, 46–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09976-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09976-9

Keywords

Navigation