Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences

Abstract

Women are less competitive than men in most contexts studied. This difference has been linked to the gender gap in socio-economic outcomes. To examine whether this gender difference is linked to differential beliefs about competition, we developed a scale measuring lay beliefs about competition and tested whether these beliefs account for gender differences in competitive attitudes and behaviors. A mini meta-analysis (N = 2331) of responses to this scale shows that men attribute more positive outcomes to competition than women. In particular, men are more likely to believe that competition improves performance, builds character, and leads to creative problem-solving. In contrast, the gender differences are smaller, less robust, and inconsistent for the different negative outcomes attributed to competition, such as encouraging unethical behavior, hurting self-esteem, and damaging relationships. We also show in two studies that only positive lay beliefs about competition predict competitive attitudes and behaviors, and account for (some of) the gender difference in competitiveness. We discuss possible reasons that women and men hold different beliefs about competition and the implications of these differences for the optimal design of social and organizational structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    The data for this study were collected in the context of a larger project (Jury et al. 2019; Korn et al. 2019). None of the findings from the research herein have been presented in any prior work.

  2. 2.

    We tested whether participants who participated in the second round were different from those who did not. The two groups did not differ in gender composition [χ2(1) = 0.55, p = .47], average endorsement of positive beliefs about competition [F(1, 901) = 0.30, p = .86], or average endorsement of negative beliefs about competition [F(1, 901) < 0.01, p = .95]. However, participants who did participate in the second round were significantly older (M = 37.0, SD = 11.8) than participants who did not complete the second round (M = 32.0, SD = 10.2), F(1, 901) = 23.3, p < .01.

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlgren, A., & Johnson, D. W. (1979). Sex differences in cooperative and competitive attitudes from the 2nd through the 12th grades. Developmental Psychology, 15(1), 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 438–459). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Salvanes, K. G., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2016). Willingness to compete: Family matters. Management Science, 62, 2149–2162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Maximiano, S. (2013). Gender, competitiveness, and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1438–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.

  7. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and Holland’s occupational types. Personnel Psychology, 56(1), 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bays, J., Goland, T., & Newsum, J. (2009, July). Using prizes to spur innovation. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/using-prizes-to-spur-innovation.

  10. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bönte, W., & Piegeler, M. (2013). Gender gap in latent and nascent entrepreneurship: Driven by competitiveness. Small Business Economics, 41, 961–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Booth, A., & Nolen, P. (2012). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 81, 542–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bosquet, C., Combes, P.-P., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2017). Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, No 1511.

  16. Brooks, A. W. (2014). Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1144–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burnette, J. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2012). Buffering against weight gain following dieting setbacks: An implicit theory intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 721–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 655–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buser, T. (2016). The impact of losing in a competition on the willingness to seek further challenges. Management Science, 62(12), 3439–3449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buser, T., Niederle, M., & Oosterbeek, H. (2014). Gender, competitiveness and career choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1409–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Campell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, D., Oh, I.-S., & Colbert, A. E. (2015). Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1542–1567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Datta Gupta, N., Poulsen, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2013). Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Economic Inquiry, 51, 816–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dennehy, J. (2012). Competition, gender and management: Beyond winning and losing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccles’ expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fischer, K. W., Knight, C. C., & Van Parys, M. (1993). Analyzing diversity in developmental pathways: Methods and concepts. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways (pp. 33–56). Basel: S. Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fletcher, T. D., & Nusbaum, D. N. (2010). Development of the Competitive Work Environment Scale: A multidimensional climate construct. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Flory, J. A., Leibbrandt, A., & List, J. A. (2014). Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job-entry decisions. Review of Economic Studies, 82, 122–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition a social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gill, D. L., & Deeter, T. E. (1988). Development of the sport orientation questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gill, D. L., & Prowse, V. (2014). Gender differences and dynamics in competition: The role of luck. Quantitative Economics, 5, 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77, 1637–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1049–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2011). Which dimensions of culture matter for long-run growth? American Economic Review, 101, 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 128–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hayward, R. D., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2007). How competition is viewed across cultures: A test of four theories. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(4), 364–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8(2), 35 (MS #1677).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Johnson, D. W., & Norem-Hebeisen, A. A. (1979). A measure of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Judge, T., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. (2007). Personality and career success. In H. Gunz & M. Peiperl (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 59–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jury, M., Aelenei, C., Chen, C., Darnon, C., & Elliot, A. J. (2019). Examining the role of perceived prestige in the link between students’ subjective socioeconomic status and sense of belonging. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219827361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kanthak, K., & Woon, J. (2015). Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kirsch, I. (Ed.). (1999). How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kleinjans, K. J. (2009). Do gender differences in preferences for competition matter for occupational expectations? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 701–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Korn, R., Daumiller, M., & Elliot, A. J. (2019). Back to the roots: Achievement goal standards and standpoints. Learning and Individual Differences, 72, 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kray, L. J., & Haselhuhn, M. (2007). Implicit theories of negotiating ability and performance: Longitudinal and experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 49–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee, S. Y., Kesebir, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2016). Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 869–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lee, S., Niederle, M., & Kang, N. (2014). Do single-sex schools make girls more competitive? Economics Letters, 124, 474–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Leith, S. A., Ward, C. L. P., Giacomin, M., Landau, E. S., Ehrlinger, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2014). Changing theories of change: Strategies shifting in implicit theories endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 597–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Lever, J. (1978). Sex differences in the complexity of children’s play and games. American Sociological Review, 43, 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(2), 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lynn, R. (1993). Sex differences in competitiveness and the valuation of money in twenty countries. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 507–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Mayr, U., Wozniak, D., Davidson, C., Kuhns, D., & Harbaugh, W. (2012). Competitiveness across the life span: The feisty fifties. Psychology and Aging, 27, 278–285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist, 61(3), 192–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Morin, L. P. (2015). Do men and women respond differently to competition? Evidence from a major education reform. Journal of Labor Economics, 33, 443–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Nicholson, N. (2000). Managing the human animal. London: Texere Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3, 601–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ors, E., Palomino, F., & Peyrache, E. (2013). Performance gender gap: Does competition matter?. Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 443–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Preece, J., & Stoddard, O. (2015). Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 117, 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Price, J. (2008). Gender differences in the response to competition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 61, 320–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2015). Taste for competition and the gender gap among young business professionals. NBER Working Paper, No. 21695.

  92. Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1990). Construction of a hypercompetitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 630–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Ryckman, R. M., Hammer, M., Kaczor, L. M., & Gold, J. A. (1996). Construction of a personal development competitive attitude scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(2), 374–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Schneider, B. H., Benenson, J. F., Fülöp, M., Berkics, M., & Sándor, M. (2011). Cooperation and competition. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed., pp. 472–490). London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Schneider, B. H., Woodburn, S. S., del Toro, P. S., & Udvari, S. J. (2005). Cultural and gender differences in the implications of competition for early adolescent friendship. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 163–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Smither, R. D., & Houston, J. M. (1992). The nature of competitiveness: The development and validation of the competitiveness index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10–74). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Stevenson, A., & White, M. (2011). Concise Oxford English dictionary (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Sutter, M., & Glätzle-Rützler, D. (2014). Gender differences in the willingness to compete emerge early in life and persist. Management Science, 61, 2339–2354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Tamir, M., John, O. P., Srivastava, S., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 731–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1998). The naive scientist revisited: Naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Weinberg, R. S., Gould, D., Yukelson, D., & Jackson, A. (1981). The effect of preexisting and manipulated self-efficacy on a competitive muscular endurance task. Journal of Sport Psychology, 3, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Weisfeld, C. C. (1986). Female behaviour in mixed-sex competition: A review of the literature. Developmental Review, 6, 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Wilson, A. E., & English, J. A. (2017). The motivated fluidity of lay theories of change. In C. M. Zedelius, B. C. N. Müller, & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), The science of lay theories: How beliefs shape our cognition, behavior, and health (pp. 17–43). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Woods, S. A., & Hampson, S. E. (2010). Predicting adult occupational environments from gender and childhood personality traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1045–1057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dan Cable and Michael Parke for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Selin Kesebir.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kesebir, S., Lee, S.Y., Elliot, A.J. et al. Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences. Motiv Emot 43, 719–739 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09779-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Competitiveness
  • Gender
  • Lay theories
  • Gender gap