Skip to main content

Independent and joint effects of teacher enthusiasm and motivation on student motivation and experiences: A field experiment

Motivation and Emotion volume 43, pages 255–265 (2019)Cite this article

“Go on, lean in. Listen, you hear it? - - Carpe - - hear it? - - Carpe, carpe diem, seize the day boys, make your lives extraordinary.”

John Keating, teacher in “Dead Poets’ Society” authored by N. H. Kleinbaum

Abstract

Instructional research has consistently identified teacher enthusiasm as a key facet of high teaching quality. Social psychological reasoning—specifically, the expectancy formation hypothesis—further implies that cues about the teacher’s motivation are relevant for students’ motivation and emotional experiences. The present experiment integrated these two strands of research by independently manipulating implicit behavioral motivational cues (high vs. low displayed teacher enthusiasm) and explicit motivational cues (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) to explore their individual and joint effects on students’ perceptions of the teacher, and their own emotional experiences, motivation, and subjective learning. Data was collected from N = 483 university students (59% female) who watched a short instructional video. An actor, introduced as volunteering or paid expert, delivered an identical script either with high or low displayed enthusiasm. 2 × 2 between-subjects ANOVAs showed favorable main effects of both displayed enthusiasm and ascribed teacher motivation on perceptions of the teacher and on students’ own emotional experiences. Additionally, there were significant interaction effects on perceived teacher motivation and enjoyment and on subjective learning. Only in the low displayed enthusiasm condition, the extrinsically motivated teacher was perceived as less joyful and motivated. Student ratings of subjective learning were particularly high in the high enthusiasm/intrinsic condition and in the low enthusiasm/extrinsic condition. We conclude that teachers can send out positive motivational signals even in the presence of extrinsic motivation cues (i.e., financial compensation for teaching).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Even though there is empirical evidence that within teachers, felt enjoyment does not always fully co-occur with enthusiastic teaching behavior within teachers (Taxer and Frenzel 2017).

  2. Also excluded from analyses were n = 84 students who were nonnative German speakers, thus the validity of the self-report scale was doubtable for them.

References

  • Andersen, J. F., Andersen, P. A., & Jensen, A. E. (1979). The measurement of of nonverbal immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 7, 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. L. Wittock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edn., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. L. (1978). Effects of enthusiasm training on preservice elementary teachers. Research in Teacher Education, 29, 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York: University Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (2007). Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: Evidence from student ratings. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher eduation: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 93–143). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Rosenthal, R. (2005). No more teachers’ dirty looks: Effects of teacher nonverbal behavior on student outcomes. In R. Riggio & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), Applications of Nonverbal Communication (pp. 157–192). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JASP-Team. (2017). JASP (Version 0.8.1). [Computer Software].

  • Keller, M. M., Becker, E. S., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. L. (2018). When teacher enthusiasm is authentic or inauthentic: Lesson profiles of teacher enthusiasm and relations to students’ emotions. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418782967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. M., Hoy, W., Goetz, A., T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9354-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, C. L. (2009). I love my job, but I’m not a martyr: how schools’ professional cultures influence engagement among second-stage teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Sand Diego, CA.

  • Kreber, C., McCune, V., & Klampfleitner, M. (2010). Formal and implicit conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Frenzel, A. C., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., Tsai, Y.-M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18, 468–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education (pp. 319–383). Dordrecht; Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1993). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2959975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Ware, J. E. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox Effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and students’ ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naftulin, D. H., Ware Jr, J. E., & Donnelly, F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox Lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 630–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., Kempler, T., & College, G. (2000). “What’s everybody so excited about?”: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 1521–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peer, E., & Babad, E. (2014). The Doctor Fox research (1973) rerevisited: “Educational seduction” ruled out. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Wild, T. C. (2010). Social contagion of motivation between teacher and student: Analyzing underlying processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2017). Inauthentic expressions of enthusiasm: Exploring the cost of emotional dissonance in teachers. Learning and Instruction, 53, 74–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J. E. J., & Williams, R. G. (1977). Discriminant analysis of student ratings as a means for identifying lecturers who differ in enthusiasm or information-giving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, T. C., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). Social contagion of motivational orientations. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 141–157). New York: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, T. C., Enzle, M. E., & Hawkins, W. L. (1992). Effects of perceived extrinsic versus intrinsic teacher motivation on student reactions to skill acquisition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 245–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, T. C., Enzle, M. E., Nix, G., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Perceiving others as intrinsically or extrinsically motivated: Effects on expectancy formation and task engagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(8), 837–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P., Wheeless, L., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/036452042000228054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, A. M., & Weasmer, J. (2003). Great expectations for student teachers: Explicit and implied. Education, 123, 681–714.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany

    Anne C. Frenzel & Carolin Schwab

  2. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Jamie L. Taxer

  3. Institute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany

    Christof Kuhbandner

Authors
  1. Anne C. Frenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamie L. Taxer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carolin Schwab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christof Kuhbandner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne C. Frenzel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (SAV 41 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frenzel, A.C., Taxer, J.L., Schwab, C. et al. Independent and joint effects of teacher enthusiasm and motivation on student motivation and experiences: A field experiment. Motiv Emot 43, 255–265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9738-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9738-7

Keywords

  • Teacher enthusiasm
  • Expectancy formation hypothesis
  • Student motivation and emotions
  • Teaching quality
  • Subjective learning