Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 137–148 | Cite as

Relationships at risk: How the perceived risk of ending a romantic relationship influences the intensity of romantic affect and relationship commitment

Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing on emotional intensity theory (EIT: Brehm in Personality and Social Psychology Review 3:2–22, 1999; Brehm and Miron in Motivation and Emotion 30:13–30, 2006), this experiment (N = 104) shows how the manipulated risk of ending a romantic relationship influences the intensity of romantic affect and commitment. As predicted by EIT, the intensity of both romantic feelings varied as a cubic function of increasing levels of manipulated risk of relationship breakup (risk not mentioned vs. low vs. moderate vs. high). Data additionally showed that the effects of manipulated risk on romantic commitment were fully mediated by feelings of romantic affect. These findings complement and extend prior research on romantic feelings (Miron et al. in Motivation and Emotion 33:261–276, 2009; Miron et al. in Journal of Relationships Research 3:67–80, 2012) (a) by highlighting the barrier-like properties of manipulated risk of relationship breakup and its causal role in shaping romantic feelings, and (b) by suggesting that any obstacle can systematically control—thus, either reduce or enhance—the intensity of romantic feelings to the extent that such obstacles are perceived as ‘risky’ for the fate of the relationship.

Keywords

Emotional intensity Deterrence Perceived risk of relationship breakup Romantic affect Relationship commitment Goals Motivation Emotions Paradoxical effects 

References

  1. Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament [About the act of will and temperament]. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., & Shaver, P. R. (2009). Attachment, perceived conflict, and couple satisfaction: Test of a mediational dyadic model. Family Relations, 58, 634–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00580.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brehm, J. W. (1975). Research on motivational suppression [Grant Proposal]. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. W. (1999). The intensity of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 2–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, J. W., & Brummett, B. H. (1998). The emotional control of behavior. In M. Kofta, G. Weary, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Personal control in action (pp. 133–154). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brehm, J. W., Brummett, B. H., & Harvey, L. (1999). Paradoxical sadness. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 31–44. doi: 10.1023/A:1021379317763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brehm, J. W., & Miron, A. M. (2006). Can the simultaneous experience of opposing emotions really occur? Motivation and Emotion, 30, 13–30. doi: 10.1007/s11031-006-9007-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brehm, J. W., Miron, A. M., & Miller, K. (2009). Affect as a motivational state. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1069–1089. doi: 10.1080/02699930802323642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brehm, J. W., Wright, R. A., Solomon, S., Silka, L., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Perceived difficulty, energization, and the magnitude of goal valence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 21–48. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90003-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brummett, B. H. (1996). The intensity of anger. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  13. Brunell, A. B., Pilkington, C. J., & Webster, G. D. (2007). Perceptions of risk in intimacy in dating couples: Conversation and relationship quality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 92–119. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2007.26.1.92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, L., Simpson, J.A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45,1304–1312. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.45.12.1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dill, J. (1997). Paradoxical anger: Investigations into the emotional and physiological predictions of Brehm’s theory of emotional intensity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
  18. Driscoll, R. (2014). Commentary and rejoinder on Sinclair, Hood, and Wright (2014): Romeo and Juliet through a narrow window. Social Psychology, 45, 312–314. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1–10. doi: 10.1037/h0033373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Felmlee, D. (2001). No couple is an island: A social network perspective on dyadic stability. Social Forces, 79, 1259–1257. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13–30. doi: 10.2307/2786866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fishbein, M., Hennessy, M., Yzer, M., & Curtis, B. (2004). Romance and risk: romantic attraction and health risks in the process of relationship formation. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 9, 273–285. doi: 10.1080/13548500410001721846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuegen, K., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). The intensity of affect and resistance to social influence. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 39–63). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Gager, C. T., & Sanchez, L. (2003). Two as one? Couples’ perceptions of time spent together, marital quality, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 21–50, doi: 10.1177/0192513X02238519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gendolla, G. H. E., & Wright, R. A. (2016). Gathering the diaspora: Aims and visions for motivation science. Motivation Science, 2, 135–137. doi: 10.1037/mot0000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247–262. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hillgruber, A. (1912). Fortlaufende Arbeit und Willensbetätigung [Continuos work and will activity]. Leipzig: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
  30. Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2014). Introduction to statistics in psychology (6th ed.). London: Pearson Education Ltd..Google Scholar
  31. Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kline, G. H., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Olmos-Gallo, P. A., St. Peters, M., Whitton, S. W., & Prado, L. M. (2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311–318. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.311.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2006). Marginalized relationships: The impact of social disapproval on romantic relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 40–51. doi: 10.1177/014616720527871.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Levinger, G. (1999). Duty toward whom? Reconsidering attractions and barriers as determinants of commitment in a relationship. In W. H. Jones & J. M. Adams (Eds.). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 37–52). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGue, M., & Lykken, D. T. (1992). Genetic influence on risk of divorce. Psychological Science, 3, 368–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00049.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meuwly, N., & Schoebi, D. (2017). Social psychological and related theories on long-term committed romantic relationships. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11, 106–120. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miron, A. M., Brummett, B., Ruggles, B., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). Deterring anger and anger-motivated behaviors. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 326–338. doi: 10.1080/0197353080250225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miron, A. M., Ferguson, M. A., & Peterson, A. (2011). Difficulty of refusal to assist the outgroup nonmonotonically affects the intensity of prejudiced affect. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 484–498. doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9220-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miron, A. M., Knepfel, D., & Parkinson, S. K. (2009). The surprising effect of partner flaws and qualities on romantic affect. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 261–276. doi: 10.1007/s11031-009-9138-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miron, A. M., Parkinson, S. K., & Brehm, J. W. (2007). Does happiness function like a motivational state?. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 248–267. doi: 10.1080/02699930600551493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miron, A. M., Rauscher, F. H., Reyes, A., Gavel, D., & Lechner, K. K. (2012). Full-dimensionality of relating in romantic relationships. Journal of Relationships Research, 3, 67–80. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2012.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monroe, S. M., Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1999). Life events and depression in adolescence: Relationship loss as a prospective risk factor for first onset of major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 606–614. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.108.4.606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134–148. doi: 10.1177/0146167203255984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Pantaleo, G. (2011). Enjoying multiplicity: From familiarity to ‘multiple perspectives’. In M. Cadinu, S. Galdi, & A. Maass (Eds.), Social perception, cognition, and language in honour of Arcuri (pp. 51–65). Padua: Cleup.Google Scholar
  47. Pantaleo, G., Miron, A., Ferguson, M., & Frankowski, S. (2014). Effects of deterrence on intensity of group identification and efforts to protect group identity. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 855–865. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9440-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parks, M. R., Stan, C. M., & Eggert, L. L. (1983). Romantic involvement and social network involvement. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 116–131. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3033848.
  49. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2013). Playing moderately hard to get. An application of Brehm’s emotion intensity theory. Interpersona, 7, 260–271. doi: 10.5964/ijpr.v7i2.128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhoades, G. K., Kamp Dush, C. M., Atkins, D. C., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Breaking up is hard to do: The impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 366–374. doi: 10.1037/a0023627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Richter, M. (2013). A closer look into the multi-layer structure of motivational intensity theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 1–12. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Richter, M. (2015). Goal pursuit and energy conservation: Energy investment increases with task demand but does not equal it. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 25–33. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9429-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richter, M. (2016). Residual tests in the analysis of planned contrasts: Problems and solutions. Psychological Methods, 21, 112–120. doi: 10.1037/met0000044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Richter, M., Brinkmann, K., & Carbajal, I. ((2016)). Effort and autonomic activity: A meta-analysis of four decades of research on motivational intensity theory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 108, 34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.07.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Richter, M., Gendolla, G. H. E., & Wright, R. A. (2016). Three decades of research on motivational intensity theory: What we have learned about effort and what we still don’t know. Advances in Motivation Science, 3, 149–186. doi: 10.1016/bs.adms.2016.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roberson, B. F., & Wright, R. A. (1994). Difficulty as a determinant of interpersonal appeal: A social-motivational application of energization theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 373–388. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1503_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204. doi: 10.1177/026540759301000202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmitt, M. T., Miller, D. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2008). The difficulty of making reparations affects the intensity of collective guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 267–279. doi: 10.1177/1368430208090642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silvia, P. J., & Brehm, J. W. (2001). Exploring alternative deterrents to emotional intensity: Anticipated happiness, distraction, and sadness. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 575–592. doi: 10.1080/02699930125985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sinclair, H. C., & Ellithorpe, C. N. (2014). The new story of Romeo and Juliet. In C. R. Agnew (Ed.). Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad (Advances in Personal Relationships) (pp. 148–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBo9781139333640.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinclair, H. C., Hood, K., & Wright, B. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz, 1972): Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170–178. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi: 10.2307/270723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sprecher, S. (2011). The influence of social networks on romantic relationships: Through the lens of the social network. Personal Relationships, 18, 630–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01330.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stanek, J. C., & Richter, M. (2016). Evidence against the primacy of energy conservation: Exerted force in possible and impossible handgrip tasks. Motivation Science, 2, 49–65.doi: 10.1037/mot0000028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. VanderDrift, L. E., Agnew, C., & Wilson, J. E. (2009). Non-marital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: The mediating role of dissolution consideration. Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications. Paper 25. doi: 10.1177/0146167209337543.
  72. Wilkinson, L., & the Task Force on Statistical Inference—APA Board of Scientific Affairs. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wright, H. F. (1937). The influence of barriers upon strength of motivation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wright, R. A. (2008). Refining the prediction of effort: Brehm’s distinction between potential motivation and motivation intensity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass: Motivation and Emotion, 2, 682–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wright, R. A. (2011). Motivational when motivational wasn’t cool. Chapter. In R. M. Arkin (Ed.), Most underappreciated: 50 prominent social psychologists describe their most unloved work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wright, R. A. (2016). Motivation theory essentials: Understanding motives and their conversion into effortful goal pursuit. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 16–21. doi: 10.1007/s11031-015-9536-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wright, R. A., Toi, M., & Brehm, J. W. (1985). Difficulty and interpersonal attraction. Motivation and Emotion, 8, 327–341. doi: 10.1007/BF00991871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UniSR-Social.Lab, Faculty of PsychologySan Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations