Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 545–561 | Cite as

You can do it if you really try: The effects of motivation on thinking for pleasure

  • Sarah Alahmadi
  • Nicholas R. Buttrick
  • Daniel T. Gilbert
  • Amber M. Hardin
  • Erin C. Westgate
  • Timothy D. Wilson
Original Paper

Abstract

People find it difficult to enjoy their own thoughts when asked to do so, but what happens when they are asked to think about whatever they want? Do they find thinking more or less enjoyable? In the present studies, we show that people are more successful in enjoying their thoughts when instructed to do so. We present evidence in support of four reasons why this is: without instructions people do not realize how enjoyable it will be to think for pleasure, they do not realize how personally meaningful it will be to do so, they believe that thinking for pleasure will be effortful, and they believe it would be more worthwhile to engage in planning than to try to enjoy their thoughts. We discuss the practical implications of thinking for pleasure for promoting alternatives to the use of technology.

Keywords

Motivation Emotion regulation Enjoyment of thought Conscious thought Affective forecasting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-1423747. We thank Doug Tannen and Jeramy Spitzer for assistance with Study 2.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistable: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. American Time Use Survey Activity Lexicon. (2012). Retrieved March 2, 2015 from: http://www.bls.gov/tus/lexiconwex2012.pdf.
  3. Buttrick, N. R., Choi, H., Wilson, T. D., Oishi, S., Boker, S. M., Wilks, D. C. (2017). Thinking versus doing for enjoyment: A cross-cultural replication. Under editorial review.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens. (2015). Retrieved July 14, 2016 from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/census_researchreport.pdf.
  6. Dr. Seuss (1975). Oh, the THINKS you can think! New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Franklin, M. S., Mrazek, M. D., Anderson, C. L., Smallwood, J., Kingstone, A., & Schooler, J. (2013). The silver lining of a mind in the clouds: Interesting musings are associated with positive mood while mind-wandering. Frontiers in Psychology: Perception Science, 4, 583.  10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gross, J. J., Richards, J. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Emotion regulation in everyday life. In D. K. Snyder, J. A. Simpson & J. N. Hugues (Eds.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 13–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11468-001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huntsinger, J. R., Isbell, L. M., & Clore, G. L. (2014). The affective control of thought: Malleable, not fixed. Psychological Review, 121, 600–618. doi: 10.1037/a0037669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 4–41. doi: 10.1080/02699930802619031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2015). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people unhappy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. Emotion, 11, 807–815.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Nielsen Total Audience Report. (2016). The Nielsen Company. Retrieved September 23, 2016 from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2016/the-total-audience-report-q1-2016.html.
  16. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. [Software manual]. Austin, TX (www.liwc.net)Google Scholar
  17. Powers, W. (2010). Hamlet’s Blackberry. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  18. Schooler, J. W., Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). The pursuit and monitoring of happiness can be self-defeating. In J. Carrillo & I. Brocas (Eds.), Psychology and economics (pp. 41–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, E. N., & Frank, M. C. (2015). Replication of “Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind; Study 8” by Wilson et al. (2014, Science). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  20. Solomon, I. D. (2001). Thomas Edison: The Fort Meyers Connection. Charleston: Arcadia.Google Scholar
  21. Song, X., & Wang, X. (2012). Mind wandering in Chinese daily lives–an experience sampling study. PLoS ONE, 7, e44423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Thoreau, H. D. (2009). Walden. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing (reprint of 1854 ed.).Google Scholar
  24. Wayne, T. (2016). The end of reflection. The New York Times. Retrieved June 20, 2016 from: http://nyti.ms/21e8i51.
  25. Westgate, E. C., & Wilson, T. D. (2017). Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  26. Westgate, E. C., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2017). With a little help for our thoughts: Making it easier to think for pleasure. Emotion. doi: 10.1037/emo0000278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345–411). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, T. D., Raza, S., Buttrick, N. R., & Gilbert, D. T. (2017). Unpublished raw data, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, T. D., Reinhard, D., Westgate, E. C., Gilbert, D. T., Ellerbeck, N., Hahn, C., Brown, C. L., & Shaked, A. (2014). Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science, 345, 75–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, T. D., Westgate, E. C., Buttrick, N. R., & Gilbert, D. T. (2017). Unpublished raw data, University of Virginia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations