Individual-based relative deprivation (IRD) decreases prosocial behaviors
- 706 Downloads
Five studies investigated the relationship between individual-based relative deprivation (IRD) and prosocial behaviors. Study 1 found that income satisfaction, a concept closely related to IRD, was negatively associated with prosocial values across cultures. Study 2 found a negative association between IRD and prosocial aspirations among a sample of Chinese university students. Study 3 revealed a negative association between IRD and volunteer behaviors. In Studies 4 and 5, we found that laboratory-induced IRD decreased undergraduate students’ prosocial values and behaviors. Moreover, Study 5 also found that the tendency to prioritize self-interest over others’ mediated the effect of IRD on prosocial behaviors. Implications of these findings are discussed.
KeywordsIRD Prosocial values Prosocial behaviors
This research is supported by Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China allocated to the first author (Grant No. 31400899).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research is approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing University.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In G. Lindzey, D. Gilbert, & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., Shead, N. W., & Hodgins, D. C. (2008). Gambling as a search for justice: Examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1514–1529. doi: 10.1177/0146167208322956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Correia, I., & Vala, J. (2004). Belief in a just world, subjective well-being and trust of young adults. In C. Dalbert & H. Sallay (Eds.), The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood: Origins and consequences (pp. 85–100). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dambrun, M., Taylor, D. M., McDonald, D. A., Crush, J., & Méot, A. (2006). The relative deprivation-gratification continuum and the attitudes of South Africans toward immigrants: A test of the V-curve hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1032–1044. doi: 10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Ketelaar, T., & Au, W. T. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behavior of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429–453. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moscatelli, S., Albarello, F., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2014). Badly off or better off than them? The impact of relative deprivation and relative gratification on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 248–264. doi: 10.1037/a0036704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- WIN-Gallup International. (n.d.). Global index of religiosity and atheism. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from http://www.Gallup-international.com
- World Bank Group. (n.d.). GDP per capita (current US$). Retrieved March 3, 2015, from http://www.data.worlbank.org
- World Bank Group. (n.d.). GINI index. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from http://www.data.worlbank.org
- World Values Survey Association. (n.d.). World Values Surveys six-wave integrated data file, 2010–2014 [dataset]. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org