Linking job demands and resources to burnout and work engagement: Does passion underlie these differential relationships?
This study examined the role of passion for work in the health impairment and motivational processes proposed by the job demands-resources model. Based on the dualistic model of passion, we proposed that harmonious and obsessive passion intervene simultaneously in the relationship between (1) job demands and burnout/engagement, and (2) job resources and burnout/engagement. This model was tested in two occupational samples: nurses (n = 1,179) and teachers (n = 745). Results from structural equation modeling support the proposed model in both samples. That is, both types of passion partially mediated the relationship between job demands and burnout, while harmonious passion partially mediated the relationship between job demands and engagement. Moreover, harmonious passion partially mediated the relationship between job resources and burnout/work engagement. Implications for burnout research and management practices are discussed.
KeywordsPassion for work Burnout Work engagement Job demands-resources model Dualistic model of passion
This work was supported by a Grant from the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Société et la Culture and a fellowship from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec awarded to Claude Fernet.
- Boudrias, J.-S., Desrumaux, P., Gaudreau, P., Nelson, K., Brunet, L., & Savoie, A. (2011). Modeling the experience of psychological health at work: The role of personal resources, social-organizational resources, and job demands. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 372–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 132–162). CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185.Google Scholar
- Donahue, E. G., Forest, J., Vallerand, R. J., Lemyre, P.-N., Crevier-Braud, L., & Bergeron, É. (2012). Passion for work and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of rumination and recovery. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 4(3), 341–368.Google Scholar
- Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.Google Scholar
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Hobfoll, S. E., & Freedy, J. (1993). Conservation of resources: A general stress theory applied to burnout. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and practice (pp. 115–133). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Vallerand, R. J., Carbonneau, N., Jowett, S., Paquet, Y., Bureau, J. S., et al. (2012). A Short Form of the Passion Scale: Evaluation of Factorial Validity and Invariance across Demographic Variables and Activity Categories. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2004). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. In P. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well being: Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies (Vol. 3, pp. 91–134). Oxford: JAI Press/Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Linley, A. (2008). Average to A+: Realizing strengths in yourself and others. Coventry: CAPP Press.Google Scholar
- Mageau, G. A., Vallerand, R. J., Charest, J., Salvy, S.-J., Lacaille, N., Bouffard, T., et al. (2009). On the development of harmonious and obsessive passion: The role of autonomy support, activity specialization, and identification with the activity. Journal of Personality, 77(3), 601–645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Vallerand, R. J., Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Parker, P., Morin, A. J. S., Carbonneau, N., et al. (2013). Passion: Does one scale fit all. Construct validity of two-factor passion scale and psychometric invariance over different activities and languages. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 796–809.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
- Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory—general survey. In C. Maslach, S. E. Jackson, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), The Maslach burnout inventory-test manual (3rd ed., pp. 22–26). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J. (2010). On passion for life activities: The dualistic model of passion. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 97–193). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., & Halliwell, W. (1983). Vers une méthodologie de validation culturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la psychologie du sport [Toward a methodology of cross-cultural validation of psychological questionnaires: Implications for the psychology of sport]. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 8, 9–18.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., & Houlfort, N. (2003). Passion at work: Toward a new conceptualization. In D. Skarlicki, S. Gilliland, & D. Steiner (Eds.), Social issues in management: emerging perspectives of values in organizations (Vol. 3, pp. 175–204). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., Houlfort, N., & Forest, J. (in press). Passion for work: determinants and outcomes. In M. Gagné (Ed), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- van de Ven, B., Vlerick, P., & De Jonge, J. (2008). Disq 2.0. The DISC Questionnaire French version 2.0. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology.Google Scholar