Reduced cognitive control in passionate lovers
Passionate love is associated with intense changes in emotion and attention which are thought to play an important role in the early stages of romantic relationship formation. Although passionate love usually involves enhanced, near-obsessive attention to the beloved, anecdotal evidence suggest that the lover’s concentration for daily tasks like study and work may actually be impaired, suggesting reduced cognitive control. Affect might also contribute to changes in cognitive control. We examined the link between passionate love and cognitive control in a sample of students who had recently become involved in a romantic relationship. Intensity of passionate love as measured by the Passionate Love Scale was shown to correlate with decreased individual efficiency in cognitive control as measured in Stroop and flanker task performance. There was no evidence that affective changes mediate this effect. This study provides the first empirical evidence that passionate love in the early stages of romantic relationship is characterized by impaired cognitive control.
KeywordsPassionate love Cognitive control Flanker task Stroop task Passionate Love Scale (PLS)
We are very grateful to Eveline Euser, whose enthusiastic input and support were invaluable for this project. We thank Kimee van Almen, Dion Koesoemo Joedo, Faye Koolen, Erik van Loo, Tahnee Snelder, Jitske Voorham, and all other students involved in this project, for recruiting and testing the participants. This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) to the third author.
- Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In K. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 516–539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Bruyneel, L., van Steenbergen, H., Hommel, B., Band, G. P. H., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. (2013). Happy but still focused: Failures to find evidence for a mood-induced widening of visual attention. Psychological Research, 77, 320–332.Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, S., & Hatfield, E. (2013). Passionate love and sexual desire. In encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2008). Activation and measurement of motivational states. In A. Elliott (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 235–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hommel, B. (2012). Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search. In P. M. Todd, T. T. Hills, & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain (Vol. 9, pp. 215–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Langeslag, S. J. E., van der Veen, F. M., & Röder, C. H. (2012). Attention modulates the dorsal striatum response to love stimuli. Human Brain Mapping. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22197.
- Mashek, D., Aron, A., & Fisher, H. E. (2000). Identifying, evoking and measuring intense feelings of romantic love. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 24, 48–55.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: The Random House Group, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions (Reprinted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, Vol 18, Pg 643-662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 121, 15–23.Google Scholar
- Tallis, F. (2005). Crazy for you. Psychologist, 18, 72–74.Google Scholar
- Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
- Vohs, K. D., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Wiers, R. W., Gladwin, T. E., Hofmann, W., Salemink, E., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2013). Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wildt, A. R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Analysis of covariance. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar