Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 444–450 | Cite as

Reduced cognitive control in passionate lovers

  • Henk van Steenbergen
  • Sandra J. E. Langeslag
  • Guido P. H. Band
  • Bernhard Hommel
Original Paper

Abstract

Passionate love is associated with intense changes in emotion and attention which are thought to play an important role in the early stages of romantic relationship formation. Although passionate love usually involves enhanced, near-obsessive attention to the beloved, anecdotal evidence suggest that the lover’s concentration for daily tasks like study and work may actually be impaired, suggesting reduced cognitive control. Affect might also contribute to changes in cognitive control. We examined the link between passionate love and cognitive control in a sample of students who had recently become involved in a romantic relationship. Intensity of passionate love as measured by the Passionate Love Scale was shown to correlate with decreased individual efficiency in cognitive control as measured in Stroop and flanker task performance. There was no evidence that affective changes mediate this effect. This study provides the first empirical evidence that passionate love in the early stages of romantic relationship is characterized by impaired cognitive control.

Keywords

Passionate love Cognitive control Flanker task Stroop task Passionate Love Scale (PLS) 

References

  1. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H. F., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 327–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aron, A., & Henkemeyer, L. (1995). Marital satisfaction and passionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. NeuroReport, 11, 3829–3834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Bratslvasky, E. (1999). Passion, intimacy, and time: Passionate love as a function of change in intimacy. Personality and social psychology review, 3, 49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and social psychology review, 5, 242–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In K. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 516–539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  11. Bruyneel, L., van Steenbergen, H., Hommel, B., Band, G. P. H., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. (2013). Happy but still focused: Failures to find evidence for a mood-induced widening of visual attention. Psychological Research, 77, 320–332.Google Scholar
  12. Burkett, J. P., & Young, L. J. (2012). The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 224, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cacioppo, S., & Hatfield, E. (2013). Passionate love and sexual desire. In encyclopedia of human behavior. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Mor, N. (2011). Can emotion modulate attention? Evidence for reciprocal links in the attentional network test. Experimental Psychology, 58, 171–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cools, R. (2008). Role of dopamine in the motivational and cognitive control of behavior. Neuroscientist, 14, 381–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalley, J. W., Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69, 680–694.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diamond, L. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, H. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 9, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher, H. E., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2006). Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 361, 2173–2186.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Förster, J., Epstude, K., & Ozelsel, A. (2009). Why love has wings and sex has not: How reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1479–1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2008). Activation and measurement of motivational states. In A. Elliott (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 235–246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Gable, P., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 322–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gonzaga, G. C., Turner, R. A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships. Emotion, 6, 163–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 63–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate-relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hommel, B. (2012). Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search. In P. M. Todd, T. T. Hills, & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive search: Evolution, algorithms, and the brain (Vol. 9, pp. 215–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Karremans, J. C., Verwijmeren, T., Pronk, T. M., & Reitsma, M. (2009). Interacting with women can impair men’s cognitive functioning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1041–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhbandner, C., & Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Dissociable effects of valence and arousal in adaptive executive control. Plos One, 6, e29287.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langeslag, S. J. E., Jansma, B. A., Franken, I. H. A., & Van Strien, J. W. (2007). Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biological Psychology, 76, 109–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langeslag, S. J. E., van der Veen, F. M., & Röder, C. H. (2012). Attention modulates the dorsal striatum response to love stimuli. Human Brain Mapping. doi:10.1002/hbm.22197.
  35. Malladian, I., & Davies, M. F. (1994). The colors of love: Personality-correlates of love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin, E. A., & Kerns, J. G. (2011). The influence of positive mood on different aspects of cognitive control. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 265–279.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mashek, D., Aron, A., & Fisher, H. E. (2000). Identifying, evoking and measuring intense feelings of romantic love. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 24, 48–55.Google Scholar
  38. McAlister, A. R., Pachana, N., & Jackson, C. J. (2005). Predictors of young dating adults’ inclination to engage in extradyadic sexual activities: A multi-perspective study. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 331–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. London: The Random House Group, Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 160–166.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillips, L. H., Bull, R., Adams, E., & Fraser, L. (2002). Positive mood and executive function: Evidence from Stroop and fluency tasks. Emotion, 2, 12–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., Overbeek, G., Vermulst, A. A., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2010). What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 119–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pronk, T. M., Karremans, J. C., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2011). How can you resist? Executive control helps romantically involved individuals to stay faithful. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 827–837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reis, H. T., & Aron, A. (2008). Love what is it, why does it matter, and how does it operate? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritter, S. M., Karremans, J. C., & van Schie, H. T. (2010). The role of self-regulation in derogating attractive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 631–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 383–388.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Loving and leaving: Sex-differences in romantic attachments. Sex Roles, 7, 821–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell, J. A., Weis, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sophia, E. C., Tavares, H., Berti, M. P., Pereira, A. P., Lorena, A., Mello, C., et al. (2009). Pathological love: Impulsivity, personality, and romantic relationship. CNS Spectrums, 14, 268–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stroop, J. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions (Reprinted from Journal Experimental-Psychology, Vol 18, Pg 643-662, 1935). Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 121, 15–23.Google Scholar
  55. Tallis, F. (2005). Crazy for you. Psychologist, 18, 72–74.Google Scholar
  56. Tennov, D. (1979). Love and limerence: The experience of being in love. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
  57. Vohs, K. D., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vohs, K. D., Finkenauer, C., & Baumeister, R. F. (2011). The sum of friends’ and lovers’ self-control scores predicts relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiers, R. W., Gladwin, T. E., Hofmann, W., Salemink, E., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2013). Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: Mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wildt, A. R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Analysis of covariance. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk van Steenbergen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sandra J. E. Langeslag
    • 3
  • Guido P. H. Band
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bernhard Hommel
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden University Institute of PsychologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations