Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping
- 1.1k Downloads
In two studies (N’s = 57 and 115), we demonstrate that type of perspective-taking instruction (“imagine self” vs. “imagine other”) differentially affects two motives for helping: self-other overlap and empathic concern. Imagine-self instructions produce greater self-other overlap than imagine-target and objective instructions, while both types of perspective-taking instruction promote empathic concern relative to an objective condition. In Study 2, imagine-self instructions indirectly increased the likelihood of helping via empathic concern and self-other overlap, while imagine-target instructions led indirectly to greater helping only through empathic concern. We discuss how different perspective-taking instructions may implicate different emotional and motivational paths to increasing helping.
KeywordsPerspective taking Instructions Self-other overlap Empathy Helping
The authors would like to thank Colton Christian and Irina Kuzmina for their comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
- Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., et al. (1997b). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gehlbach, H., & Brinkworth, M. E. (2012). The social perspective taking process: Strategies and sources of evidence in taking another’s perspective. Teachers College Record, 114, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Hedges, L. V. (1986). Advances in statistical methods for meta-analysis. In D. S. Cordray & M. W. Lipsey (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 11). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical method for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Hodges, S. D., Clark, B. A. M., & Myers, M. W. (2011). Better living through perspective taking. In R. Biswas-Diener (Ed.), Positive psychology as social change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ickes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Preston, S. D., & Hofelich, A. J. (2012). The many faces of empathy: Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1754073911421378.
- Skorinko, J. L., Laurent, S. M., Bountress, K., Nyein, K. P., & Kuckuck, D. (in press). Effect of perspective taking on courtroom decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
- Stotland, E. (1969). Exploratory investigation of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271–313). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar