Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual differences that moderate the effectiveness of relational reasons for self-improvement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies tested the hypotheses that relationally-autonomous reasons (RARs) for goals predict attainment, and that this relationship is stronger among highly relational and agreeable people than others. Study 1 (n = 134) assessed participants’ self-construal and Agreeableness, and their tendency to pursue subgoals for RARs, relationally-controlled reasons (RCRs), and personally-controlled reasons (PARs). One month later, they indicated the number of subgoals they had attained. RARs were positively correlated with attainment, and this relationship was stronger among highly relational and agreeable people than others. In Study 2 (n = 74), self-construal and Agreeableness were assessed then participants generated possible outcomes of 3 subgoals using a Goal Attainment Scale. They were then randomly assigned to a goal program that either emphasized RARs, RCRs, or PARs. One week later, participants indicated their level of attainment. Highly relational and agreeable people had higher levels of attainment than others in the program emphasizing RARs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branje, S., Van Aken, M., Van Lieshout, C., & Mathijssen, J. (2003). Personality judgments in adolescents’ families: The perceiver, the target, their relationship, and the family. Journal of Personality, 71, 49–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, K. A., Gore, J. S., & Sturgeon, J. L. (2012). The role of self-construal in response to charity advertisements. Self and Identity, 11, 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S., & Morris, M. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1984). The basis of self-determination: Intrinsic motivation and integrated internalizations. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 5, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downie, M., Koestner, R., Horberg, E., & Haga, S. (2006). Exploring the relation of independent and interdependent self-construals to why and how people pursue personal goals. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 517–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S. (2013). The influence of close others in daily goal pursuit (under review).

  • Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2006). Pursuing goal for us: Relationally-autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 848–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2011a). Task framing and perceived fit: The role of personality, task label, and partner involvement. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 368–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2011b). Conflicts of interest: Relational self-construal and decision-making in interpersonal contexts. Self and Identity, 10, 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Kanagawa, C. (2009). Acting in our interests: Relational self and goal motivation across cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., & Rogers, M. J. (2010). Why do I study? The moderating role of attachment style on academic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 150, 560–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394–1408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, J. M. (2001). Family, school, and community predictors of adolescent growth-conducive experiences: Global and specific approaches. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261–271). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. J., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lun, J., Oishi, S., Coan, J. A., Akimoto, S., & Miao, F. F. (2010). Cultural variations in motivational responses to felt misunderstanding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 986–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., Das, R., & Chakravarthy, S. (2011). Culture and the role of choice in agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 46–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Higgins, E. T., & Mangels, J. (2012). Interdependent self and task framing: How fit enhances math performance and use of learning resources. Manuscript under review.

  • Rudy, D., Sheldon, K. M., Awong, T., & Tan, H. H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 983–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., Ferguson, Y., Gunz, A., Houser-Marko, L., Nichols, C. P., et al. (2010). Persistent pursuit of need-satisfying goals leads to increased happiness: A 6-month experimental longitudinal study. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Wu, C., et al. (2004). Self-concordance and subjective well-being in four cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Filak, V. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 267–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 152–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. (2006). It’s not just the amount that counts: Balanced need-satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 331–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., & Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Schüler, J. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,. doi:10.1037/a0024952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E. J., & Tassinary, L. G. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. L., Bristol, T., Mowen, J. C., & Chakraborty, G. (2000). Alternative modes of self-construal: Dimensions of connectedness-separateness and advertising appeals to the cultural and gender-specific self. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, L., & Gore, J. S. (2012). Relational motivation and well-being: A cross-cultural comparison. Manuscript under review.

  • Zaleski, Z. (1988). Close relationships and acting for self-set goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 191–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA

    Jonathan S. Gore

Authors
  1. Jonathan S. Gore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S. Gore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gore, J.S. Individual differences that moderate the effectiveness of relational reasons for self-improvement. Motiv Emot 37, 639–652 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9344-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9344-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation