Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 245–260 | Cite as

Beauty is in the eye of the psychologically fulfilled: How need satisfying experiences shape aesthetic perceptions of spaces

  • Netta Weinstein
  • Nicole Legate
  • Andrew K. Przybylski
Original Paper

Abstract

Individuals perceive beauty as a function of physical attributes paired with the subjective experience of an object or a space. Yet, little or no research has investigated how either relational or emotional experiences shape perceptions of the physical world. Four studies were conducted to address this question using self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci in Psychol Inq 11:319–338, 2000) as a guiding framework. Studies 1 and 2 indicated that satisfaction of the needs for competence, relatedness, and autonomy in one’s childhood home was linked to perceptions of beauty directly and indirectly through emotions of the past (recollections of happiness) and present (nostalgia). Two additional studies focused on present-day spaces. In Study 3, we found that need satisfaction impacted perceptions of the university campus as beautiful. In a final study, we manipulated needs in the lab to identify a causal model of aesthetic perceptions. Findings are contextualized within the self-determination theory and perceived beauty literatures.

Keywords

Beauty Self-determination theory Needs Happiness Nostalgia 

References

  1. Ali, W. (1999). The Arab contribution to Islamic art: From the seventh to the fifteenth centuries. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, I. (1993). Dialectics, physical environments, and personal relationships. Communication Monographs, 60, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleton, J. H. (1975). The experience of landscape. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Appleton, J. H. (1984). Prospects and refuges revisited. Landscapes Journal, 3, 91–103.Google Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  6. Arthur, L. M. (1977). Predicting scenic beauty of forest environment: Some empirical tests. Forest Science, 23, 151–160.Google Scholar
  7. Audirac, I. (1999). Unsettled views about the fringe: Rural-urban or urban-rural frontiers. In J. F. Owen & M. B. Lapping (Eds.), Contested countryside: The rural urban fringe in North America (pp. 7–32). Brookfield: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Bachelard, G. (1958). The poetics of space. Paris: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.Google Scholar
  12. Birkhoff, G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boschetti, M. A. (1987). Memories of childhood homes: Some contributions of environmental autobiography to interior design education and research. Journal of Interior Design, 13, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1987). Context effects in perceived environmental quality assessments: Scene selection and landscape quality ratings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1990). Scaling of ratings: Concepts and methods. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-293. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  17. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods (1st ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 36, 462–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooper, J. (1997). Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  22. Craik, K., & Zube, E. (1977). Perceived environmental quality indices. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Daniel, T. C. (1976). Measuring public aesthetic preference. In J. Thames (Ed.), Disturbed land reclamation and use in the southwest. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  24. Daniel, T. C. (1977). Criteria for the development of perceived environmental quality indices. In E. Zube & K. Craik (Eds.), Perceived environmental quality indices. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Daniel, T. C. (1990). Measuring the quality of the human environment: A psychophysical approach. American Psychologist, 45, 633–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-167. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  28. Daniel, T. C., & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment (Vol. 6, pp. 39–84). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  29. Danto, A. (2003). The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  30. De Botton, A. (2006). The architecture of happiness. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  31. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  34. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Bargmann, K. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 372–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gepshtein, S., & Kubovy, M. (2000). The emergence of visual objects in space-time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 8186–8191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The story of art. London: Phaidon Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. Guest, A. M., & Lee, B. (1983). Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives, 26, 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 1, 34–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holak, S. L., & Havlena, W. J. (1992). Nostalgia: An exploratory study of themes and emotions in the nostalgic experience. In J. F. Sherry Jr & B. Sternthal (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 19 (pp. 380–387). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  41. Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods (2nd ed.). New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kenny, D. A., Korchmaros, J. D., & Bolger, N. (2003). Lower level mediation in multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 8, 115–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Korsmeyer, C. (1998). Aesthetics: The big questions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2004). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 32, 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levesque, C., Zuehike, N. A., Stanek, L. R., & Layla, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Education Psychology, 96, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindberg, E., Hartig, T., Garvill, J., & Gärling, T. (1992). Residential-location preferences across the life span. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lynch, M. F., Plant, R. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Psychological needs and threat to safety: Implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Professional Psychology, 36, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mendes, W. B., Major, B., McCoy, S., & Blascovich, J. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 278–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Michell, C. T. (1995). Action, perception, and the realization of design. Design Studies, 16, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nasar, J. L. (1983). Adult viewers’ preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 589–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orians, G. H., & Heerwagon, J. H. (1992). Evolved response to landscapes. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Parsons, R. (1991). The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 434–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson, G. L., & Neumann, E. S. (1969). Modeling and predicting human response to the visual recreation environment. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 219–237.Google Scholar
  59. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 87–110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rossman, B., & Ulehla, Z. J. (1977). Psychological reward values associated with wilderness use: A bifunctional-reinforcement approach. Environment and Behavior, 9, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Russell, J. A., & Ward, L. M. (1981). On the psychological reality of environmental meaning: A reply to Daniel and Ittelson. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. M. (1997). On energy, personality and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan, R. M., La Guardia, J. G., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V. I., & Kim, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and culture. Personal Relationships, 12, 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seamon, D. (1982). The phenomenological contribution to environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2008). Nostalgia: Past, present, and future. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shaffer, G. S., & Anderson, L. M. (1985). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Reis, H. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shin, J., Espin, C. A., Deno, S., & McConnell, S. (2004). Use of hierarchical linear modeling and curriculum-based measurement for assessing academic growth and instructional factors for students with learning difficulties. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siegel, E. (1955). Is beauty the making one of opposites? Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 14, 282–283.Google Scholar
  75. Stewart, I. (2008). Why beauty is truth: The history of symmetry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Stokes, R., & Frederick-Recascino, C. (2003). Woman’s perceived body image: Relations with personal happiness. Journal of Women & Aging, 15, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. Prentice Hall, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  78. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  80. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van Den Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction, and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Watkins, R. (2001). Lived space is poetic space. A study of the home as an aesthetic enterprise. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  83. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: An examination of motivational constructs underlying prosocial behavior and their influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology, 1977 (pp. 84–136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  85. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 975–993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Winkleman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17, 799–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zube, E. H. (1974). Cross-disciplinary and intermode agreement on the description and evaluation of landscape resources. Environment and Behavior, 6, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Netta Weinstein
    • 1
  • Nicole Legate
    • 2
  • Andrew K. Przybylski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EssexColchesterUK
  2. 2.University of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations