Skip to main content

Passion in the romantic sphere: A look at relational outcomes

Motivation and Emotion volume 37, pages 106–120 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Based on the Dualistic Model of Passion (Vallerand et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 85:756–767, 2003), a bidimensional perspective on romantic passion, that distinguishes between harmonious and obsessive passions, is proposed. The present research aimed at examining how these two types of romantic passion relate to indices of relationship quality, how one’s own passions are associated with one’s partner’s passions and relationship quality, and how the two types of passion relate to relationship stability over time. Study 1 revealed that harmonious passion was more strongly associated with high relationship quality than obsessive passion. Using a dyadic design, Study 2 revealed that the findings of Study 1 applied to both genders. In addition, one’s own passion predicted partner’s relationship quality, partners were not always matched in terms of the predominant type of passion, and passion matching did not predict relationship quality. Finally, Study 3 revealed that types of passion predicted relationship status over a 3-month period.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. The passion subscale of the PRQCI (Fletcher et al. 2000) is composed of items reflecting sexuality (e.g., “Our relationship is sexually passionate”). For this reason, we refer to it as a measure of sexual passion.

  2. Because of the interdependent nature of couple data, we used a dyad structure (Kenny et al. 2006) where women’s and men’s data are entered under a same dyadic unit to control for shared variance. Each case or line of data therefore represents a couple in which partners are nested.

  3. Mean levels of harmonious passion were 5.47 and 5.54 and mean levels of obsessive passion were 3.97 and 3.74 for men and women, respectively.

  4. Analyses revealed no significant differences between this subset and the rest of the sample on harmonious passion, obsessive passion, relationship quality, age, and gender of participants at Time 1. However, participants who took part in the follow-up study had a shorter relationship length (M = 51.58 months) at Time 1, F(1, 320) = 4.63, p < .05, than participants who did not complete the follow-up (M = 70.91 months), although the magnitude of this difference was small (R 2 = .01).

  5. In a pilot study, the 12-item and 14-item version of the RPS were shown to be highly correlated (r = .87 for the harmonious passion subscale; r = .84 for the obsessive passion subscale) and were shown to lead to similar results in terms of their associations with various outcomes (e.g., relationship quality, rumination, internalization of partner in the self, etc.).

  6. Of the 143 participants, 7.7 % (n = 11) of them were no longer involved in the same romantic relationship at Time 2. These participants did not have a different relationship length at Time 1 than those who were still involved in the same relationship at Time 2 (F [1, 142] = 2.13, p = .15, R 2 = .01).

References

  • Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1991). Love and sexuality. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 25–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Henkemeyer, L. (1995). Marital satisfaction and passionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, J., Dubois, G., & Martineau, R. (1986). Traduction française de l’Échelle d’ajustement dyadique. [French translation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Wotman, S. R., & Stillwell, A. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scriptlessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. E., & Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., & Broughton, R. (2001). Gender and personality differences in conceptions of love: An interpersonal theory analysis. Personal Relationships, 8, 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, G. (2001). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, J., & Blass, T. (1997). Dating partner preferences: A function of similarity of love styles. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 595–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Pillemer, J. T., O’Brien, M. U., & Le, Y. L. (2008). The endurance of love: Passionate and companionate love in newlywed and long-term marriages. Interpersona, 2, 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993a). Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on passionate love and sexual desire. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993b). Love and attachment processes. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotion (2nd ed., pp. 654–662). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1993c). Love, sex, and intimacy: Their psychology, biology, and history. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (2000). Love and attachment processes. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 595–604). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Walster, G. W. (1978). A new look at love. Lantham, MA: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1993). Lovers as friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Hatfield, E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Jowett, S., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, E. G., & Lorimer, R. (2008). Passion in sport: On the quality of the coach-player relationship. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 541–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafrenière, M.-A. K., Vallerand, R. J., Donahue, R., & Lavigne, G. L. (2009). On the costs and benefits of gaming: The role of passion. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12, 285–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, F. G., Fons-Scheyd, A., Morua, W., & Chaliman, R. (2006). Dyadic perfectionism as a predictor of relationship continuity and distress among college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 543–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, P., & Brown, J. T. (1999). Creating passion and intimacy. In J. Carlson & L. Sperry (Eds.), The intimate couple (pp. 55–65). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mageau, G. A., Vallerand, R. J., Charest, J., Salvy, S.-J., Lacaille, N., Bouffard, T., et al. (2009). On the development of harmonious and obsessive passion: The role of autonomy support, activity valuation, and identity processes. Journal of Personality, 77, 601–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, G. D., Clark, E. M., & Brock, K. F. (1995). Individual and partner love styles: Implications for the quality of romantic involvements. Journal of Social and Personal relationships, 12, 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noller, P. (1996). What’s this thing called love? Defining the love that supports marriage and family. Personal Relationships, 3, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, G. L., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations between perceived autonomy support, forms of self regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Prevalence rates of gambling problems in Montreal, Canada: A Look at old adults and the role of passion. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 275–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, F., Vallerand, R.J., & Lavigne, G. (2009). Passion does make a difference in people's lives: A look at well-being in passionate and non-passionate individuals. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippe, F., Vallerand, R. J., Houlfort, N., Lavigne, G. L., & Donahue, E. G. (2010). Passion for an activity and quality of interpersonal relationships: The mediating role of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 917–932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Une nouvelle conceptualisation de la passion amoureuse. [A new conceptualization of romantic passion]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Quebec in Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

  • Reeve, J. (1997). Understanding motivation and emotion (2e.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.

  • Regan, P. C. (2000a). Love relationships. In L. T. Szuchman & F. Muscarella (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on human sexuality (pp. 232–282). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. C. (2000b). The role of sexual desire and sexual activity in dating relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, B., Fortin, S., & Vallerand, R. J. (2006). The relationship between passion and injury in dance students. Journal of Dance Medicine & Science, 10, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, F. L., Vallerand, R. J., Ratelle, C. F., Mageau, G. A., & Provencher, P. J. (2002). Passion and gambling: Validation of the gambling passion scale (GPS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 45–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Séguin-Lévesque, C., Laliberté, M. L., Pelletier, L. G., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2003). Harmonious and obsessive passions for the Internet: Their associations with couples’ relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P., & Aron, A. (1993). Passionate love and marital satisfaction at key transition points in the family life circle. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J. (2008). On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Canadian Psychology, 49, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J. (2010). On passion for life activities: The dualistic model of passion. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 97–193). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C. F., Léonard, M., et al. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Ntoumanis, N., Philippe, F., Lavigne, G. L., Carbonneau, N., Bonneville, A., et al. (2008). On passion and sports fans: A look at football. Journal of Sport Sciences, 26, 1279–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Rousseau, F. L., Grouzet, F. M. E., Dumais, A., & Grenier, S. (2006). Passion in sport: A look at determinants and affectives experiences. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallerand, R. J., Salvy, S. J., Mageau, G. A., Denis, P., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Blanchard, C. B. (2007). On the role of passion in performance. Journal of Personality, 75, 505–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a doctoral scholarship from FCAR awarded to the first author. We thank Pierre Provencher, Julie Charest, Julie Coiteux, Chantale Bélanger, Chantale Ouellet, Mariane Dupuis, and David Michaliszyn for their valuable assistance in collecting and entering the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département des Fondements et pratiques en éducation, Pavillon des sciences de l’éducation, Université Laval, 2320 rue des Bibliothèques, local 946, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada

    Catherine F. Ratelle

  2. Département de Psychologie, Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Noémie Carbonneau & Robert J. Vallerand

  3. Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Geneviève Mageau

Authors
  1. Catherine F. Ratelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Noémie Carbonneau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert J. Vallerand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Geneviève Mageau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine F. Ratelle.

Additional information

Studies 1 and 2 were part of the first author’s doctoral dissertation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ratelle, C.F., Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R.J. et al. Passion in the romantic sphere: A look at relational outcomes. Motiv Emot 37, 106–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9286-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9286-5

Keywords

  • Romantic passion
  • Couples
  • Love
  • Relationship quality
  • Gender differences