Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ideology is a potent motivational force; human beings are capable of committing atrocities (as well as acts of generosity and courage) and sacrificing even their own lives for the sake of abstract belief systems. In this article, we summarize the major tenets of a model of political ideology as motivated social cognition (Jost et al. in Psychol Bull 129:339–375, 2003a, Psychol Bull 129:389–393, 2003b, Person Soc Psychol Bull 33:989–1007, 2007), focusing on epistemic, existential, and relational motives and their implications for left-right (or liberal-conservative) political orientation. We review behavioral evidence indicating that chronically and temporarily activated needs to reduce uncertainty, ambiguity, threat, and disgust are positively associated with conservatism (or negatively associated with liberalism). Studies from neuroscience and genetics suggest that right- (vs. left-) wing orientation is associated with greater neural sensitivity to threat and larger amygdala volume, as well as less sensitivity to response conflict and smaller anterior cingulate volume. These findings and others provide converging evidence for Jost and colleagues’ model of ideology as motivated social cognition and, more broadly, reflect the utility of an integrative political neuroscience approach to understanding the basic cognitive, neural, and motivational processes that give rise to ideological activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford, UK: Harpers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Master, S. L., Yee, C. M., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1975). Escape from evil. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2005). Is God an accident? The Atlantic Monthly, 296(5), 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1790/1987). Reflections on the revolution in France. In J. G. A. Pocock (Ed.), Reflections on the revolution in France (pp. 1–218). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Visser, P. S. (2003). Political psychology and social neuroscience: Strange bedfellows or comrades in arms? Political Psychology, 24, 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canli, T. (2009). Genomic imaging. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Beer (Eds.), Methods in the neurobiology of social and personality psychology (pp. 295–312). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. (2004). Personalizing politics: A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist, 59, 581–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, D., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the on line monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I. W., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., Ogilvie, D. M., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2005). American roulette: The effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal attraction: The effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship-oriented leaders. Psychological Science, 15, 846–851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, C. R., Huber, M., Ho, A. K., & Koleva, S. P. (2009). Political orientation and ideological inconsistencies: (Dis)comfort with value tradeoffs. Social Justice Research, 22, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, H. M., Thoma, S. J., & Hestevold, N. (2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 571–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. J. (1992). Emotion and affective style: Hemispheric substrates. Psychological Science, 3, 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle. American Psychologist, 61, 741–756.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dember, W. N. (1991). Cognitive, motivation, and emotion: Ideology revisited. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 153–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federico, C. M., Ergun, D., Hunt, C. V., & Kurowski, K. (2011). Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and ideological affinity. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Federico, C. M., & Goren, P. (2009). Motivated social cognition and ideology: Is attention to elite discourse a prerequisite for epistemically motivated political affinities? In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 267–291). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Federico, C. M., Hunt, C. V., & Ergun, D. (2009). Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: Translating “competitive jungles” and “dangerous worlds” into ideological reality. Social Justice Research, 22, 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Dawes, C. T. (2008). Two genes predict voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 70, 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailliot, M. T., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: Effect of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fears of dying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 49–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological and political orientation–the left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376–382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 28–84). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariri, A. R., & Holmes, A. (2006). Genetics of emotional regulation: The role of the serotonin transporter in neural function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 182–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. (2003). Clarifying the emotive functions of asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. Psychophysiology, 40, 838–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatemi, P., et al. (2011). A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 73, 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzer, E., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of cleanliness promote conservative political and moral attitudes. Psychological Science , 22, 517–522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientation, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009a). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 714–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009b). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9, 435–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., McGregor, I., Hirsh, J. B., & Nash, K. (2009). Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science, 20, 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (2009). “Elective affinities”: On the psychological bases of left-right ideological differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004a). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2004b). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263–283). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule—using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 677–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. T., Freedman, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2007). Us vs. them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates. Neuropsychologia, 45, 55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmelmeier, M. (2007). Political conservatism, rigidity, and dogmatism in American foreign policy officials: The 1996 Mennis data. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, K., Wood, J. N., Spampinato, M. V., & Grafman, J. (2006). Politics on the brain: An fMRI investigation. Social Neuroscience, 1, 25–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1978). Janus. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A., Scherer, L., Schott, J. P., Olson, K., Andrews, R., O’Brien, T., et al. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 886–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., & Arndt, J. (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laponce, J. A. (1981). Left and right: The topography of political perceptions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, L., & Chirumbolo, A. (2008). Conservatism as motivated avoidance of affect: Need for affect scales predict conservatism measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 755–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., & Ochsner, K. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24, 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Raab, E. (1978). The politics of unreason: Right-wing extremism in America, 1790–1977. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M., Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30, 921–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, I., & Marigold, D. C. (2003). Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 838–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nail, P. R., & McGregor, I. (2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Social Justice Research, 22, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A., Steele, G., & Thompson, A. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Jost, J. T. (2009). The politics of intergroup attitudes. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., Vernon, P. A., Harris, J. A., & Jang, K. L. (2001). The heritability of attitudes: A study of twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 845–860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, M. S., Hatemi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. Oxford, England: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, M. (2004). Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1485–1493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 995–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrizzi, J. A., Jr., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L. (2010). Disgust: A predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodoridis, A., & Nelson, A. J. (in press). Of BOLD claims and excessive fears: A call for caution and patience regarding political neuroscience. Political Psychology.

  • Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology , 32, 785–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2007). What is the relevance of attachment and life history to political values? Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives (pp. 388–411). Chicago: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1965). The psychology of being right—and left. Transaction, 3, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybur, J. M., Merriman, L. A., Hooper, A. E. C., McDonald, M. M., & Navarrete, C. D. (2010). Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity related? Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 599–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence. Social Justice Research, 20, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2004). Openness to experience and boundaries in the mind: Relationships with cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Personality, 72, 659–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, N. G., Kojetin, B. A., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1990). Genetic and environmental influences on religious interests, attitudes, and values: A study of twins reared apart and together. Psychological Science, 1, 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. W., & Federico, C. M. (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology, 28, 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissflog, M. J., van Noordt, S. J. R., Choma, B. L., Dywan, J., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2010). Sociopolitical ideology and electrocortical responses. Psychophysiology, 47(Sup), S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 US presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1947–1958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamboni, G., Gozzi, M., Krueger, F., Duhamel, J., Sirigu, A., & Grafman, J. (2009). Individualism, conservatism, and radicalism as criteria for processing political beliefs: a parametric fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 4, 367–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work on this article was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation to John T. Jost (BCS-0617558) and to David Amodio (BCS-0847350). We wish to thank Jay van Bavel, Alumit Ishai, and Elizabeth Phelps for helpful discussions of some of the ideas contained here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA

    John T. Jost & David M. Amodio

Authors
  1. John T. Jost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Amodio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Amodio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jost, J.T., Amodio, D.M. Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motiv Emot 36, 55–64 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation