Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Task framing and perceived fit: The role of personality, task label, and partner involvement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that individual differences in social connectedness moderate the association between task frame and perceptions of the task. In experiment 1, 75 participants completed an assessment of relational self-construal prior to engaging in an interview with a partner. Participants then received an explanation that the interview enhanced either relationship skills or occupational skills. Results indicated that high relationals perceived their partner more favorably when the task was framed as relational then when it was framed as occupational. In experiment 2, 185 participants completed self-construal and agreeableness assessments before completing an interview task with or without a partner. Participants then received relational or occupational explanations for the task. The results replicated the findings among high relationals, and also showed that agreeable individuals responded positively when they engaged in a relationally framed interview with a partner. Implications for person–environment fit theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, A. T., Higgins, E. T., & Klem, A. (2003). How “fun/importance” fit impacts performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091–1103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstatter, H. (1994). Well-being and motivational person–environment fit: A time-sampling study of emotions. European Journal of Personality, 8, 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, K. A., Gore, J. S., & Sturgeon, J. L. (in press). The role of self-construal in response to charity advertisements. Self and Identity.

  • Cable, D., & Judge, T. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person–environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, times perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Millberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S., & Morris, M. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512–523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 399–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1998). Subjective well-being and personality. In D. F. Barone & M. Hersen (Eds.), Advanced personality: The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (pp. 311–334). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Lord, S. E., & Roeser, R. W. (1996). Round holes, square pegs, rocky roads, and sore feet: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth (Eds.), Adolescence: Opportunities and challenges. Rochester symposium on developmental psychopathology (Vol. 7, pp. 47–92). Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enz, C. (1988). The role of value congruity in intra-organizational power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 284–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidell, L. S., & Tabachnick, B. G. (2003). Preparatory data analysis. In J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 115–141). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, C. L. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength as a function of regulatory focus: Revisiting the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally-autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 848–861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2011). Conflicts of interest: Relational self-construal and decision-making in interpersonal contexts. Self and Identity, 10, 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. S., Cross, S. E., & Kanagawa, C. (2009). Acting in our interests: Relational self and goal motivation across cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1394–1408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820–835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person–environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Sansone, C., Blair, L. W., Epstein, J. A., & Maderlink, G. M. (1987). Attributional processes in behavior change and maintenance: Smoking cessation and continued abstinence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 372–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., Cesario, J., Hagiwara, N., Spiegal, S., & Pittman, T. (2010). Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: The role of regulatory fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 559–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 261–271). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. J., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lauver, K., & Kristof-Borwn, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’ perceptions of person-job fit and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 454–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. S., & Coté, S. (1995). Do interpersonal traits predict affect? A comparison of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 915–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, B. P., & Vallerand, R. J. (1994). Motivation, self-determination, and person–environment fit as predictors of psychological adjustment among nursing home residents. Psychology and Aging, 9, 189–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, S., Reardon, R. C., & Peterson, G. W. (2007). Person–environment congruence, self-efficacy, and environmental identity in relation to job satisfaction: A career decision theory perspective. Journal of Employment Counseling, 44, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravlin, E. C., & Ritchie, C. M. (2006). Perceived and actual organizational fit: Multiple influences on attitudes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, S., Romero-Canyas, R., Downey, G., Higgins, E. T., & Mangels, J. (2010). Interdependent self and task framing: How fit enhances math performance and use of learning resources. Manuscript under review.

  • Siefert, J., Jayaratne, S., & Chess, W. A. (1991). Job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover in health care social workers. Health and Social Work, 16, 193–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Tziner, A. (1998). Moderating effects of affective disposition and social support on the relationship between person–environment fit and strain. Psychological Reports, 82, 963–983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & David, J. P. (1998). Person–environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neuroticism, and emotional reactivity to interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E. J., & Tassinary, L. G. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, E. M., Bean, N., Gwatkin, S., & Hill, B. (1992). Family preservation workers: Sources of job satisfaction and job stress. Research on Social Work Practice, 2, 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verquer, M. L., Beehr, T. A., & Wagner, S. H. (2003). A meta-analysis of relations between person-organization fit and work attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenius, M. (1999). Personal projects in everyday places: Perceived supportiveness of the environment and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA

    Jonathan S. Gore

  2. Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

    Susan E. Cross

Authors
  1. Jonathan S. Gore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan E. Cross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S. Gore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gore, J.S., Cross, S.E. Task framing and perceived fit: The role of personality, task label, and partner involvement. Motiv Emot 35, 368–382 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9225-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9225-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation