Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The adoption of approach versus avoidance goals: The role of goal-relevant resources

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research investigated whether the adoption of approach versus avoidance goals is affected by goal-relevant resources. When individuals have few goal-relevant resources, they should prefer avoidance goals, whereas when individuals have many goal-relevant resources, they should adopt approach goals. The individual’s outcome expectancy is assumed to mediate this relationship. This hypothesis is supported by the findings of four multi-method studies with student samples. A cross-sectional field study showed a positive relationship between the extent of goal-relevant resources and approach goal adoption. In a longitudinal field study, a high number of resources predicted the increase in personal approach goal adoption over a period of 4 months, controlling for neuroticism. Two experiments showed that the manipulation of resources affected approach versus avoidance task goal adoption, with outcome expectancy mediating the relationship. These findings complement existing findings on dispositional determinants of approach versus avoidance goal adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We worked with the freeware php surveyor (http://psychmserver.unizh.ch/phpsurveyor/admin, Retrieved February 27, 2008).

  2. In order to minimise the complexity of approach versus avoidance goal indices, we will, in our further analyses, refer to the proportion of approach goals. Note that, due to the dichotomous assessment of approach versus avoidance goals, this index could also inversely be interpreted as proportion of avoidance goals.

  3. Unexpectedly the internal consistency of the resource scale was much lower than in Study 1. One might presume that this is due to the different samples of the studies. Whereas only freshman-students from the first-semester course in psychology participated in Study 1, with very similar conditions in their academic life, Study 2 worked with a much more heterogeneous sample of students from different universities and faculties in which the environmental conditions differ strongly from each other. This heterogeneity of the sample and external conditions could be reflected in a lower reliability of the scale.

References

  • Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 338–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1990). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 69–164). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81, 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, H. (1988). Sechzehn Persönlichkeits-Adjektivskalen (16PA) als Forschungsinstrument anstelle des 16PF. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 35, 370–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, H., & Königstein, M. (2001). Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions. European Journal of Personality, 15, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement. New York: World Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. (1993). Sixteen personality factor questionnaire (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal Strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 926–935.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 664–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. (2008). Approach and avoidance motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 3–14). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., Moller, A. C., Friedman, R., & Meinhardt, J. (2007). Color and psychological functioning: The effect of red on performance attainment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(1), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1998). Avoidance personal goals and the personality-illness relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1282–1299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Sheldon, K. M., & Church, M. A. (1997). Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 915–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & McAdams, D. P. (1991). Personal strivings and motive dispositions: Exploring the links. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(6), 648–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, A. M. (2006). Age-differential motivational consequences of optimization versus compensation focus in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 240–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, J. W., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). Stability and change in achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L. (2006). Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. Journal of Personality, 71, 175–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test for appetition and aversion across domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavior Research & Therapy, 8(3), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J. (1997). Developmental regulation across adulthood: Primary and secondary control of age-related challenges. Developmental Psychology, 33, 176–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heimpel, S. A., Elliot, A. J., & Wood, J. V. (2006). Basic personality dispositions, self-esteem, and personal goals: An approach-avoidance analysis. Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1293–1320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Spiegel, S. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications (pp. 171–187). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Tasks and promises with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Rosman, H., & Gagné, M. (2007). Lack of autonomy and self-control: Performance contingent rewards lead to greater depletion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 524–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2004). Goal setting and goal striving. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Emotion and motivation (pp. 165–183). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, D., & Duck, S. W. (Eds.). (1987). Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psyreon. (2007). Psychological Research Online. Retrieved January 1, 2008, from http://www.psyreon.de/content/index_ger.html.

  • Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 320–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, J. H., Kruglanski, A. W., & Friedman, R. (2002). A goal systems approach to self- regulation. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. Seligman (Eds.), The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (pp. 247–276). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psyhological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from ficition. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VandeValle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonia (TX): The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., Miller, G. E., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Adaptive self- regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal re-engagement, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494–1508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Brandstätter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnelle, J., Brandstätter, V. & Knöpfel, A. The adoption of approach versus avoidance goals: The role of goal-relevant resources. Motiv Emot 34, 215–229 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9173-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9173-x

Keywords

Navigation