Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action

Abstract

Several literatures converge on the idea that approach and avoidance/withdrawal behaviors are managed by two partially distinct self-regulatory system. The functions of these systems also appear to be embodied in discrepancy-reducing and -enlarging feedback loops, respectively. This article describes how the feedback construct has been used to address these two classes of action and the affective experiences that relate to them. Further discussion centers on the development of measures of individual differences in approach and avoidance tendencies, and how these measures can be (and have been) used as research tools, to investigate whether other phenomena have their roots in approach or avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campos, J. J., Frankel, C. B., & Camras, L. (2004). On the nature of emotion regulation. Child Development, 75, 377–394.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carver, C. S. (2003). Pleasure as a sign you can attend to something else: Placing positive feelings within a general model of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carver, C. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carver, C. S., Lawrence, J. W., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Self-discrepancies and affect: Incorporating the role of feared selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 783–792.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1999). Themes and issues in the self-regulation of behavior. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 12). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Autonomy and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (in press). Self-regulatory systems: Action and affect. In J. Y. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, R. N. (1996). Control system dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method of clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson, R. J. (1984). Affect, cognition, and hemispheric specialization. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan, & R. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotion, cognition, and behavior (pp. 320–365). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, R. J. (1988). EEG measures of cerebral asymmetry: Conceptual and methodological issues. International Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 71–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson, R. J. (1995). Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In R. J. Davidson, & K. Hugdahl (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 361–387). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–517.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Depue, R. A., & Iacono, W. G. (1989). Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 457–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Depue, R. A., Krauss, S. P., & Spoont, M. R. (1987). A two-dimensional threshold model of seasonal bipolar affective disorder. In D. Magnusson & A. Öhman (Eds.), Psychopathology: An interactional perspective (pp. 95–123). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fowles, D. C. (1980). The three arousal model: Implications of Gray’s two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17, 87–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frijda, N. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–126). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck\(^{\prime}\)’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gray, J. A. (1994a). Personality dimensions and emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 329–331). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gray, J. A. (1994b). Three fundamental emotion systems. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 243–247). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Ideals, oughts, and regulatory focus: Affect and motivation from distinct pains and pleasures. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 91–114). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson, S. L., & Carver, C. S. (in press). Extreme goal setting and vulnerability to mania among undiagnosed young adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research.

  36. Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Konorski, J. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiololgy. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248–1263.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotion: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions (pp. 123–126). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyer, B., Johnson, S. L., & Carver, C. S. (1999). Exploring behavioral activation and inhibition sensitivities among college students at risk for bipolar spectrum symptomatology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meyer, B., Johnson, S. L., & Winters, R. (2001). Responsiveness to threat and incentive in bipolar disorder: Relations of the BIS/BAS scales with symptoms. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 431–465). New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ogilvie, D. M. (1987). The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotions: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 11–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Approaching and avoiding self-determination: Comparing cybernetic and organismic paradigms of motivation. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 12, pp. 193–215). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schneirla, T. C. (1959). An evolutionary and developmental theory of biphasic processes underlying approach and withdrawal. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol.7, pp. 1–42). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zelenski, J. M., & Larsen, R. J. (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zuckerman, M. (2005). Psychobiology of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles S. Carver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carver, C.S. Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action. Motiv Emot 30, 105–110 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Approach avoidance