Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 156–163 | Cite as

The Effect of Approach and Avoidance Referents on Academic Outcomes: A Test of Competing Predictions

  • Helen W. Sullivan
  • Keilah A. Worth
  • Austin S. Baldwin
  • Alexander J. Rothman
Original Paper

Abstract

In an academic setting, we tested competing predictions derived from two conceptual models about the effects of approach and avoidance referents (e.g., goals and role models) on student performance. One model suggests a main effect such that focusing on approach referents leads to better outcomes than focusing on avoidance referents, regardless of personality (e.g., A. J. Elliot & K. M. Sheldon, 1997). Another model suggests an interaction such that focusing on either approach or avoidance referents can lead to positive outcomes, but only when people are promotion focused or prevention focused, respectively (e.g., P. Lockwood, C. H. Jordan, & Z. Kunda, 2002). Findings supported the main effect model. The more prevention focused participants were, the more avoidance goals they generated, which led to poorer grades.

Keywords

Approach and avoidance motivation Goals Regulatory focus 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The order of the first three authors was determined randomly. We would like to thank Lara Antonenko for her help with data collection. Portions of this research were presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, January 2005, New Orleans, Louisiana.

References

  1. Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505–510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 171–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lockwood, P., Wong, C., McShane, K., & Dolderman, D. (2005). The impact of positive and negative exemplars on motivation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1– 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: High-Stakes testing policies and their relations with psychological theories and research. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354–372). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shah, J., Higgins, T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Worth, K. A., Sullivan, H. W., Hertel, A. W., Jeffery, R. W., & Rothman, A. J. (2005). Avoidance goals can be beneficial: A look at smoking cessation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 107– 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen W. Sullivan
    • 1
  • Keilah A. Worth
    • 1
  • Austin S. Baldwin
    • 1
  • Alexander J. Rothman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations