Distinguishing Hope from Optimism and Related Affective States
- 1.1k Downloads
Three studies examined the conceptual and psychological differences between hope and related mental states. In Study 1, participants provided definitions of hope as well as optimism, want, desire, wish, and the non-anticipatory state of joy; in Study 2, participants wrote about a time when they had experienced each of these states. These definitions and stories were coded for a number of psychological features that were then used to distinguish the different states. Study 3 mapped the differences among the six mental states into a multidimensional conceptual space. Overall, hope is most closely related to wishing but distinct from it. Most important, hope is distinct from optimism by being an emotion, representing more important but less likely outcomes, and by affording less personal control. The importance of combining a folk-conceptual perspective with a more traditional analysis of appraisal for understanding differences among psychological constructs is discussed.
KEY WORDS:hope optimism positive psychology emotion multi-dimensional scaling future-oriented thinking appraisal folk psychology
This research was supported in part by a training grant from the National Institute of Mental Health. Thanks to Robert Mauro, Gerard Saucier, Marian Friestad, Stacey Pederson, and Gian Gonzaga for their helpful comments on this article. The data for this article were collected at the University of Oregon.
- Aspinwall, L. G., & Brunhart, S. M. (2000). What I do know won’t hurt me: Optimism, attention to negative information, coping, and health. In J. E. Gillham (Ed.), The science of optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E. P. Seligman (pp. 163–200). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
- Averill, J. R., Catlin, G., & Chon, K. K. (1990). Rules of hope. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Averill, J. R. (1994). The eyes of the beholder. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 7–14). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Maier, S. F., Peterson, C., & Schwartz, B. (2000). From helplessness to hope: The seminal career of Martin Seligman. In J. E. Gillham (Ed.), The science of optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E. P. Seligman (pp. 11–37). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
- Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 101–121.Google Scholar
- Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 45–67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2001). Values in action (VIA) classification of strengths. Retrieved August 31, 2001, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/taxonomy.htm.
- Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar