Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 324–352 | Cite as

Distinguishing Hope from Optimism and Related Affective States

  • Patricia Bruininks
  • Bertram F. Malle
Article

Three studies examined the conceptual and psychological differences between hope and related mental states. In Study 1, participants provided definitions of hope as well as optimism, want, desire, wish, and the non-anticipatory state of joy; in Study 2, participants wrote about a time when they had experienced each of these states. These definitions and stories were coded for a number of psychological features that were then used to distinguish the different states. Study 3 mapped the differences among the six mental states into a multidimensional conceptual space. Overall, hope is most closely related to wishing but distinct from it. Most important, hope is distinct from optimism by being an emotion, representing more important but less likely outcomes, and by affording less personal control. The importance of combining a folk-conceptual perspective with a more traditional analysis of appraisal for understanding differences among psychological constructs is discussed.

KEY WORDS:

hope optimism positive psychology emotion multi-dimensional scaling future-oriented thinking appraisal folk psychology 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported in part by a training grant from the National Institute of Mental Health. Thanks to Robert Mauro, Gerard Saucier, Marian Friestad, Stacey Pederson, and Gian Gonzaga for their helpful comments on this article. The data for this article were collected at the University of Oregon.

REFERENCES

  1. Aspinwall, L. G., & Brunhart, S. M. (2000). What I do know won’t hurt me: Optimism, attention to negative information, coping, and health. In J. E. Gillham (Ed.), The science of optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E. P. Seligman (pp. 163–200). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aspinwall, L. G., & Leaf, S. L. (2002). In search of the unique aspects of hope: Pinning our hopes on positive emotions, future-oriented thinking, hard times, and other people. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Averill, J. R., Catlin, G., & Chon, K. K. (1990). Rules of hope. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Averill, J. R. (1994). The eyes of the beholder. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 7–14). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gottschalk, L. A. (1974). A hope scale applicable to verbal samples. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 779–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Loewenstein, G., Weber, E., Hsee, C., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maier, S. F., Peterson, C., & Schwartz, B. (2000). From helplessness to hope: The seminal career of Martin Seligman. In J. E. Gillham (Ed.), The science of optimism and hope: Research essays in honor of Martin E. P. Seligman (pp. 11–37). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  8. Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 101–121.Google Scholar
  9. Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (2001). The distinction between desire and intention: A folk-conceptual analysis. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 45–67). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1198–1212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2001). Values in action (VIA) classification of strengths. Retrieved August 31, 2001, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/taxonomy.htm.
  12. Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Information and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Sethi, S., & Seligman, M. E. (1994). The hope of fundamentalists. Psychological Science, 5, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Snyder, C. R. (2000). Hypothesis: There is hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications (pp. 3–21). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 1047–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHendrix CollegeConwayUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations