Abstract
The Paris Agreement encourages Parties to prepare and submit long-term low greenhouse gas emission development strategies (LT-LEDS) to the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). LT-LEDS are national strategies that identify pathways or scenarios for low-emission development to reach a long-term vision and/or target, while considering broader socio-economic goals. The development of a LT-LEDS is a national process, driven by national priorities and goals, with each country facing different obstacles, and requiring distinctive approaches, priorities, and actions for the required transformation. In this work, a novel five-step back-casting approach is developed to assess alternative mitigation pathways for Tajikistan in order to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, presenting an initial assessment and mapping, and providing the country with a starting point for LT-LEDS development. The approach is based around a set of variables of policy interest, which are areas in which climate mitigation policies, actions, or programmes of incentives can be designed and implemented. Major strengths of the approach are the consistency with the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and the national greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventory. Four mitigation pathways are defined for Tajikistan, each incorporating different policy intensity levels for the variables of policy interest. It is found that although each of the four mitigation pathways provides a significant GHG emission reduction potential, only one reaches carbon neutrality by 2050, namely, the pathway that focusses on considerable policy efforts in all sectors of the economy and incorporates intensive policy efforts for both nature-based and technological carbon dioxide (CO2) removal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
ADB (2009) Building climate resilience in the agriculture sector of Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong City
Anderson K (2015) Duality in climate science. Nat Geosci 8:898–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2559
Anderson R, Morgenstern R (2011) Marginal abatement cost estimates for non-CO2 greenhouse gases: lessons from RECLAIM. Climate Policy 9:40–55. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0398
Bachmann F (2012) Potential and limitations of organic and fair trade cotton for improving livelihoods of smallholders: evidence from Central Asia. Renewable Agric Food Syst 27:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000202
Bahri A (2009) Managing the other side of the water cycle: making wastewater an asset. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm
Baus L, Nehr S (2022) Potentials and limitations of direct air capturing in the built environment. Building and Environment 208:108629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108629
Bendor R, Eriksson E, Pargman D (2021) Looking backward to the future on past-facing approaches to futuring. Futures 125:102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102666
BLS (2021) Bureau of Labor Statistics - Consumer Price Index https://www.bls.gov/cpi/. Accessed 24 June 2021
Börner J, West T, Blackman A et al (2018) National and subnational forest conservation policies: What works, what doesn’t. In: Angelsen A, Martius C, de SY V et al (eds) Transforming REDD+: Lessons and new directions. CIFOR, Bogor, pp 105–115
Brinkmann T, Santonja G, Yükseler H et al (2016) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector. European IPCC Bureau, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2791/37535
Buylova A, Fridahl M, Nasiritousi N et al (2021) Cancel out emissions The envisaged role of carbon dioxide removal technologies in long-term national climate strategies. Frontiers in Climate 3:675499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.675499
Cerruti D, Huse C (2021) Policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions from road transport. International Encyclopedia of Transportation 2021:514–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10094-6
Chang M, Thellufsen J, Zakeri B et al (2021) Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition. Applied Energy 290:116731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116731
Chará J, Reyes E, Peri P et al (2019) Silvopastoral systems and their contribution to improved resource use and sustainable development goals: evidence from Latin America. FAO, CIPAV and Agri Benchmark, Cali
City of New York (2013) New York City’s pathway to deep carbon reductions, mayor’s office of long-term planning and sustainability. United States, New York
Climact, VITO (2021) Scenarios for a climate neutral Belgium by 2050. FPS Public Health - DG Environment. Available at: https://klimaat.be/doc/climate-neutral-belgium-by-2050-report.pdf
Delgado R, Wild T, Arguello R et al (2020) Options for Colombia’s mid-century deep decarbonization strategy. Energy Strategy Reviews 32:100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100525
Duan H, Zhou S, Jiang K et al (2021) Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit. Science 372:378–385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba8767
Dunant C, Skelton A, Drewniok M et al (2019) A marginal abatement cost curve for material efficiency accounting for uncertainty. Resour Conserv Recycl 144:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.020
EC (2021) List of potential agricultural practices that eco-schemes could support. European Commission, Brussels
ECB (2021) Euro foreign exchange reference rates. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/policy_and_exchange_rates/euro_reference_exchange_rates/html/eurofxref-graph-usd.en.html. Accessed 24 Jun 2021
EEA (2021) Climate change mitigation policies and measures in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/data-viewers/climate-change-mitigation-policies. Accessed 7 Nov 2021
Falduto C, Rocha M (2020) Aligning short-term climate action with long-term climate goals: Opportunities and options for enhancing alignment between NDCs and long-term strategies. OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers No. 2020/02. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/7c980fce-en
FAO (2010) Global forest resource assessment country reports: Tajikistan. FAO, Rome
FAO (2019) Five practical actions towards low-carbon livestock. FAO, Rome
FAO (2020) Global forest resources assessment 2020: main report. FAO, Rome. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca9825en
Finon D (2012) Efficiency of policy instruments for CCS deployment. Climate Policy 12:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.605702
Fortes P, Simões S, Seixas J et al (2013) Top-down and bottom-up modelling to support low-carbon scenarios: climate policy implications. Climate Policy 13:285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.768919
Freake B (2021) Net zero emissions–from why to how. Impact 2021(2):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/2058802X.2021.1885234
Fujino J, Hibino G, Ehara T et al (2008) Back-casting analysis for 70% emission reduction in Japan by 2050. Climate Policy 8:S108–S124. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0491
Gambhir A, Tavoni M (2019) Direct air carbon capture and sequestration: how it works and how it could contribute to climate-change mitigation. One Earth 1:405–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.11.006
Gillingham K, Stock J (2018) The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.4.53
González-Sánchez M, Martín-Ortega J (2020) Greenhouse gas emissions growth in Europe: a comparative analysis of determinants. Sustainability 12:1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031012
Gopinathan N, Subramanian N, Urpelainen J (2019) Mid-century strategies: pathways to a low-carbon future? Climate Policy 19:1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1627178
Government of Tajikistan (2015) Program on development of horticulture and viticulture in the republic of Tajikistan for 2016–2020
Government of Tajikistan (2016) National development strategy of the republic of Tajikistan for the Period Up To 2030 (“NDS 2030”)
Government of Tajikistan (2019) Agency for statistics on agriculture of Tajikistan: statistical digest. https://www.stat.tj/en/. Accessed 11 Nov 2021
Government of Tajikistan (2021) Mineral Resources of the Republic of Tajikistan. http://www.gst.tj/glavnaya/prirodnye-resursy.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2021
Hans F, Day T, Röser F et al (2020) Making long-term low ghg emissions development strategies a reality – a guide to policy makers on how to develop an LTS for submission in 2020 and future revision cycles
Holmberg J, Robert K-H (2011) Backcasting - a framework for strategic planning. Int J Sust Dev World 7:291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500009470049
Holz C, Siegel L, Johnston E et al (2018) Ratcheting ambition to limit warming to 1.5°C – trade-offs between emission reductions and carbon dioxide removal. Environmental Research Letters 13:064028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac0c1
Huppes G, Deetman S, Huele R et al (2017) Strategic design of long-term climate policy instrumentations, with exemplary EU focus. Climate Policy 17:S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1242059
Hussain A, Perwez U, Ullah K et al (2021) Long-term scenario pathways to assess the potential of best available technologies and cost reduction of avoided carbon emissions in an existing 100% renewable regional power system: A case study of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), Pakistan. Energy 221:119855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119855
IEA (2012) A policy strategy for carbon capture and storage. IEA Publications, Paris, France, Sustainable Energy Policy and Technology Directorate
IEA (2015) Enabling renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies – opportunities in Eastern Europe, Caucasus, Central Asia. IEA Publications, Paris, France, Southern and Eastern Mediterranean
IEA (2018) 20 renewable energy policy recommendations. IEA Publications, Paris, France
IHA (2019) Hydropower status report: sector trends and insights. International Hydropower Association, London
IPCC (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck H et al (eds) Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 442
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston H, Buendia L, Miwa K et al (eds) Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan on behalf of the IPCC
IPCC (2014a) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y et al (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
IPCC (2014b) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. In: Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H et al (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
IPCC (2018) Summary for Policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O et al (eds) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
IRENA, IEA, REN21 (2018) Renewable energy policies in a time of transition. https://www.irena.org/publications/2018/apr/renewable-energy-policies-in-a-time-of-transition
Jiang H-D, Dong K-Y, Liang Q-M (2019) Research on marginal abatement cost: a bibliometric analysis. Energy Procedia 158:4073–4078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.829
Kesicki F, Ekins P (2012) Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution. Climate Policy 12:219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.582347
Kesicki F, Strachan N (2011) Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice. Environ Sci Policy 14:1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.004
Kim H, McJeon H, Jung D et al (2022) Integrated assessment modeling of Korea’s 2050 carbon neutrality technology pathways. Energy and Climate Change 3:100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100075
La Rovere E, Grottera C, Wills W (2018) Overcoming the financial barrier to a low emission development strategy in Brazil. International Economics 155:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.12.004
Lai Y, Dzombak D (2020) Use of the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model to forecast near-term regional temperature and precipitation. Weather Forecast 35:959–976. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-19-0158.1
Larkin C, Morrison J, Hemmings M et al (2022) Hollow fibre adsorption unit for on-board carbon capture: the key to reducing transport emissions. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100034
Larson D, Dinar A, Blankespoor B (2012) Aligning climate change mitigation and agricultural policies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington
Lopes J, Dondini M, Zhumanova M et al (2021) Understanding the role of ruminant systems on greenhouse gas emissions and soil health in selected Central Asian countries: An assessment of ruminant systems and grassland soils in Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan. FAO, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4447en
López M, Martín-Ortega J, Sempos I (2020) GHG Forecasting in Key Sectors and Impact Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Measures. Projections of GHG emissions to 2030 in Tajikistan. UNDP Tajikistan, Dushanbe. https://www.tj.undp.org/content/tajikistan/en/home/library/ghg-forecasting-in-key-sectors-and-impact-assessment-of-climate-0.html
McKinsey & Company (2009) Pathways to a low-carbon economy: version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve
NACAA (2015) Implementing EPA’s Clean Power Plan: A Menu of Options. NACAA, Washington, DC
Naegler T, Sutardhio C, Weidlich A et al (2021) Exploring long-term strategies for the German energy transition a review of multi-sector energy scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition 1:100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2021.100010
Nguyen D, Huynh T, Nasir M (2021a) Carbon emissions determinants and forecasting evidence from G6 countries. J Environ Manag 285:111988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111988
Nguyen A-T, Lu S-H, Nguyen P (2021b) Validating and forecasting carbon emissions in the framework of the environmental Kuznets curve: the case of Vietnam. Energies 14:3144. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113144
Nilsson L, Bauer F, Åhman M et al (2021) An industrial policy framework for transforming energy and emissions intensive industries towards zero emissions. Climate Policy 21:1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1957665
OECD (2020) Best Available Techniques (BAT) for Preventing and Controlling Industrial Pollution - Activity 4: Guidance Document on Determining BAT, BAT-Associated Environmental Performance Levels and BAT-Based Permit Conditions. Environment Directorate OECD, Paris
Ourbak T, Tubiana L (2017) Changing the game: the Paris Agreement and the role of scientific communities. Climate Policy 17:819–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1348331
Roberts S, Axon C, Goddard N et al (2019) Modelling socio-economic and energy data to generate business-as-usual scenarios for carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 207:980–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.029
Sebos I, Progiou A, Kallinikos L (2020) Methodological Framework for the Quantification of GHG Emission Reductions from Climate Change Mitigation Actions. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 39. https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-4236.391411
Sedik D (2009) The feed-livestock nexus in Tajikistan: livestock development policy in transition. FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, Budapest
Sinha R, Chaturvedi N (2019) A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 114:109304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109304
Souza J, Oliviera B, Ferrer J et al (2018) Industrial low carbon futures: a regional marginal abatement cost curve for Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Clean Prod 200:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.206
Stamopoulos D, Dimas P, Sebos I et al (2021) Does investing in renewable energy sources contribute to growth? A preliminary study on Greece’s National Energy and Climate Plan. Energies 14(24):8537. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248537
Strbac G, Djapic P, Pudjianto D et al (2018) Strategies for reducing losses in distribution networks. Imperial College London, London
Sugiyama M, Fujimori S, Wada K et al (2019) Japan’s long-term climate mitigation policy: multi-model assessment and sectoral challenges. Energy 167:1120–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.091
Teague W, Dowhower S, Baker S et al (2011) Grazing management impacts on vegetation soil biota and chemical physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agr Ecosyst Environ 141:310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009
Teng F, Xu S-Q (2012) Definition of business as usual and its impacts on assessment of mitigation efforts. Adv Clim Chang Res 3:212–219. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2012.00212
Thaller A, Posch A, Dugan A et al (2021) How to design policy packages for sustainable transport balancing disruptiveness and implementability. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment 91:102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102714
Timilsina G, Sikharulidze A, Karapoghosyan E et al (2016) How do we prioritize the ghg mitigation options? development of a marginal abatement cost curve for the building sector in Armenia and Georgia. Development Research Group, World Bank, Washington
Tojo N, Neubauer A, Bräuer I (2006) Waste management policies and policy instruments in Europe: an overview. IIIEE Publications, Lund, Sweden
Tsoi K, Loo B, Banister D (2021) “Mind the (Policy-Implementation) Gap”: Transport decarbonisation policies and performances of leading global economies (1990–2018). Glob Environ Chang 68:102250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102250
UNDP (2010) Promoting Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Lessons Learned from International Experience. UNDP, New York
UNDP (2021) Analysis of the transport and infrastructure sector for the NDC revision in Tajikistan. UNDP Tajikistan, Dushanbe
UNECE, FAO (2019) State of Forests of the Caucasus and Central Asia: Overview of forest and sustainable forest management in the Caucasus and Central Asia region. Geneva and New York
UNFCCC (2015) Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
UNFCCC (2021a) Glasgow Climate Pact Article 32. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_L16_adv.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2021
UNFCCC (2021b) Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement: Synthesis report by the secretariat. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_08_adv_1.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2021
UNFCCC (2021c) Registry of national long-term strategies submitted to the secretariat. https://unfccc.int/process/the-paris-agreement/long-term-strategies. Accessed 3 Apr 2022
UNFCCC (2021d) NDC Registry: Tajikistan First NDC (Updated submission). https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/NDCStaging/pages/Party.aspx?party=TJK. Accessed 9 Nov 2021
Vogt-Schilb A, Hallegatte S, Gouvello C (2014) Marginal abatement cost curves and quality of emission reductions: a case study on Brazil. Climate Policy 15:703–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.953908
Wächter P (2013) The usefulness of marginal CO2-e abatement cost curves in Austria. Energy Policy 61:1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.125
Wall R, Grafakos S, Gianoli A et al (2019) Which policy instruments attract foreign direct investments in renewable energy? Climate Policy 19:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467826
Wang Q, Cui Q, Zhou D et al (2011) Marginal abatement costs of carbon dioxide in China: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Procedia 5:2316–2320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.398
Warsi Y, Kabanov V, Zhou P et al (2020) Novel Carbon dioxide utilization technologies: a means to an end. Frontiers in Energy Research 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.574147
Workman M, Dooley K, Lomax G et al (2019) Decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - an alternative approach for long-term climate policy. Environ Sci Policy 103:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.002
Yang H, O’Connell J (2020) Short-term carbon emissions forecast for aviation industry in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production 275:122734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122734
Zhang X, Chen Y, Jiang P et al (2020) Sectoral peak CO2 emission measurements and a long-term alternative CO2 mitigation roadmap: a case study of Yunnan, China. J Clean Prod 247:119171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119171
Zhang S, Wang K, Xu W et al (2021) Policy recommendations for the zero energy building promotion towards carbon neutral in Asia-Pacific Region. Energy Policy 159:112661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112661
Acknowledgements
The research is based on the technical reports elaborated by the authors funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) to develop Mitigation Pathways for Tajikistan to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and to develop the GHG forecasting in key sectors and impact assessment of climate change mitigation policies and measures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akkermans, S., Martín-Ortega, J.L., Sebos, I. et al. Exploring long-term mitigation pathways for a net zero Tajikistan. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 28, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10053-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10053-w