Advertisement

Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling: an advanced biomass combustion technology to avoid CO2 emissions

  • Iñaki Adánez-Rubio
  • Antón Pérez-Astray
  • Alberto Abad
  • Pilar GayánEmail author
  • Luis F. De Diego
  • Juan Adánez
Original Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Bioenergy with carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (BECCS) technologies represent an interesting option to reach negative carbon emissions, which implies the removal of CO2 already emitted to the atmosphere. Chemical looping combustion (CLC) with biomass can be considered as a promising BECCS technology since CLC has low cost and energy penalty. In CLC, the oxygen needed for combustion is supplied by a solid oxygen carrier circulating between the fuel and air reactors. In the fuel reactor, the fuel is oxidized producing a CO2-concentrated stream while the oxygen carrier is reduced. In the air reactor, the oxygen carrier is regenerated with air. Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) is a CLC technology that allows the combustion of solid fuels as in common combustion with air by means of an oxygen carrier that release gaseous oxygen in the fuel reactor. In the last years, several Cu-based, Mn-based, and mixed oxide oxygen (O2) carriers have been tested showing good CLOU properties. Among them, copper (Cu)-based and Cu-Manganese (Mn) mixed oxides showed high reactivity, O2 release rate, and high O2 equilibrium concentration. The aim of this work is to study the viability of biomass combustion by CLOU process. The combustion of three types of biomass (pine sawdust, olive stone, and almond shell) were studied in a continuous 1.5 kWth CLC unit. Two O2 carriers were tested: a Cu-based oxygen carrier with Magnesium, Aluminum, Oxgen (MgAl2O4) as an inert prepared by spray drying (Cu60MgAl) and a mixed Cu-Mn oxide prepared by spray granulation (Cu34Mn66). These materials are capable of releasing gaseous oxygen when they are reduced in a different range of temperatures. CO2 capture and combustion efficiency were evaluated. Two fuel reactor operation temperatures were used: 775–850 °C for Cu34Mn66 and 900–935 °C for Cu60MgAl. High CO2 capture efficiencies and 100% combustion efficiency were reached with both oxygen carriers and with all the biomasses tested. Therefore, the CLOU technology with the Cu- and Cu-Mn-based oxygen carriers allowed avoiding CO2 emissions maintaining high combustion efficiencies. Results obtained demonstrate that this innovative biomass combustion technology combined with carbon storage lets an efficient BECCS process implementation.

Keywords

Biomass combustion CO2 capture CLOU Chemical looping Oxygen carrier BECCS 

Abbreviations

Fi

Molar flow of compound i (mol/s)

Mi

Atomic or molecular mass of i elements or compound (kg/mol)

\( {\dot{m}}_{SF} \)

Mass flow rate of biomass fed in to the fuel reactor (kg/h)

\( {m}_{FR}^{\ast } \)

Specific solid inventory (kg/MWth)

\( {\dot{m}}_s \)

Solids circulation rate (kg/h)

ROC

Oxygen transport capability (kg oxygen per kg of oxygen carrier)

T

Temperature (°C)

Xchar,FR

Char conversion (−)

ϕ

Oxygen carrier to fuel ratio (−)

ηCC

CO2 capture efficiency (−)

ηcomb, FR

Combustion efficiency in the fuel reactor (−)

ΩSF

Stoichiometric mass of O2 to convert 1 kg of biomass (kg/kg)

outAR

Outlet stream from air reactor

outFR

Outlet stream from fuel reactor

Notes

Acknowledgments

I. Adánez-Rubio acknowledges the MINECO and Universidad de Zaragoza (UZ) for the post-doctoral contract awarded (FJCI-2015-23862). A. Pérez-Astray thanks MINECO for the BES-2015-074651 pre-doctoral fellowship co-financed by the European Social Fund.

Funding information

This work was financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO Project: ENE2014-56857-R) and the European Union ERDF funds.

References

  1. Abad A, Adánez-Rubio I, Gayán P, García-Labiano F, de Diego L, Adánez J (2012) Demonstration of chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) process in a 1.5 kWth continuously operating unit using a Cu-based oxygen-carrier. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 6:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2018) Modelling chemical-looping assisted by oxygen uncoupling (CLaOU): assessment of natural gas combustion with calcium manganite as oxygen carrier. Proc Combust Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.09.037
  3. Adánez J, Abad A, Mendiara T, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F (2018) Chemical looping combustion of solid fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci 65:6–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adánez-Rubio I, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2012a) Identification of operational regions in the chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) process with a Cu-based oxygen carrier. Fuel 102:634–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adánez-Rubio I, Gayán P, Abad A, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2012b) Evaluation of a spray-dried CuO/MgAl2O4Oxygen carrier for the chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling process. Energy Fuel 26:3069–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adánez-Rubio I, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2013) Performance of CLOU process in the combustion of different types of coal with CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 12:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adánez-Rubio I, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2014a) Biomass combustion with CO2 capture by chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Fuel Process Technol 124:104–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Adánez-Rubio I, Abad A, Gayán P, García-Labiano F, de Diego LF, Adánez J (2014b) The fate of sulphur in the Cu-based chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Process. Appl Energy 113:1855–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Adánez-Rubio I, Gayán P, Abad A, García-Labiano F, de Diego LF, Adánez J (2014c) Kinetic analysis of a Cu-based oxygen carrier: relevance of temperature and oxygen partial pressure on reduction and oxidation reactions rates in chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Chem Eng J 256:69–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Adánez-Rubio I, Gayan P, Abad A, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2017a) Coal combustion by a spray granulated Cu-Mn mixed oxide for CLOU process. Appl Energy 208:561–570.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Adánez-Rubio I, Izquierdo MT, Abad A, Gayan P, de Diego LF, Adánez J (2017b) Spray granulated Cu-Mn oxygen carrier for chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 65:76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Adánez-Rubio I, Abad A, Gayan P, de Diego LF, Adánez J (2018a) CLOU process performance with a Cu-Mn oxygen carrier in the combustion of different types of coal with CO2 capture. Fuel 212:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Adánez-Rubio I, Pérez-Astray A, Mendiara T, Izquierdo MT, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2018b) Chemical looping combustion of biomass: CLOU experiments with a Cu-Mn mixed oxide. Fuel Process Technol 172:179–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council IOO (2017) http://www.internationaloliveoil.org Acessed 5 November 2017
  15. Fruit IND (2017) http://www.nutfruit.org
  16. Garcia Labiano F, García Labiano F, de Diego L, Gayán P, Abad A, Adánez J (2013) Fuel reactor modelling in chemical-looping combustion of coal: 2—simulation and optimization. Chem Eng Sci 87:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gayán P, Abad A, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2013) Assessment of technological solutions for improving chemical looping combustion of solid fuels with CO2 capture. Chem Eng J 233:56–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Geneva (Switzerland):151Google Scholar
  19. Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Leion H (2009) Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendiara T, Adánez-Rubio I, Gayán P, Abad A, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2016) Process comparison for biomass combustion: in situ gasification-chemical looping combustion (iG-CLC) versus chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Energy Technol 4:1130–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201500458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mendiara T et al (2017) Chemical looping combustion of different types of biomass in a 0.5 kWth unit. Fuel 211:868–875Google Scholar
  22. Mendiara T, García-Labiano F, Abad A, Gayán P, de Diego LF, Izquierdo MT, Adánez J (2018) Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: a review. Appl Energy 232:657–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmitz M, Linderholm CJ (2016) Performance of calcium manganate as oxygen carrier in chemical looping combustion of biochar in a 10 kW pilot. Appl Energy 169:729–737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Simell P, Ståhlberg P, Kurkela E, Albrecht J, Deutsch S, Sjöström K (2000) Provisional protocol for the sampling and anlaysis of tar and particulates in the gas from large-scale biomass gasifiers. Version 1998. Biomass Bioenergy 18:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Xu T, Jin X, Hu Z, Liu S, Xiao B, Chen Z, Hu M (2017) CuO supported on olivine as an oxygen carrier in chemical looping processes with pine sawdust used as fuel. Chem Eng J 330:480–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Carboquímica (ICB-CSIC)ZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), Dept. of Chemical and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations