Abstract
Negative emission technologies (NETs) are a set of technologies that could retrieve greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. NETs could dramatically contribute to maintaining the temperature increase to within the limit of 2 °C or even 1.5 °C. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is one of the most studied NETs. BECCS captures carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions coming from a bioenergy plant—e.g., electricity, biofuels, and hydrogen—and stores those emissions in a geologic reservoir, typically a saline aquifer. The purpose of this article is to investigate whether a research community exists on BECCS, and whether it is aligned with research priorities. To do so, a bibliometric analysis is conducted based on author collaborations on BECCS in academic journals between 2001 and 2017. The co-authorship network shows that BECCS research is largely based on the integrated assessment model (IAM) research community. These models analyze how power and transportation systems evolve under a climate constraint in the long run, e.g., until 2100. Such a focus has advantages and drawbacks. On the one hand, it helps to build a common vision of the technology and possible roadmaps. On the other hand, I highlight that the implementation features of BECCS in the near future are insufficiently assessed, e.g., techno-economic analyses, business models, local-scale assessments, and comparison with other NETs. These issues are marginal in the network, whereas long-term analyses are at its core. Future research programmes should better include them to avoid a considerable disappointment about the real potential of BECCS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akgul O, Mac Dowell N, Papageorgiou LG, Shah N (2014) A mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) supply chain optimization framework for carbon negative electricity generation using biomass to energy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 28:189–202
Al-Ansari T, Korre A, Shah N (2014) Integrated modelling of the energy, water and food nexus to enhance the environmental performance of food production systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2014). American center for life cycle assessment, San Francisco, California, USA, pp 1–10
Anderegg WRL, Prall JW, Harold J, Schneider SH (2010) Expert credibility in climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12107–12109
Azar C, Lindgren K, Andersson BA (2003) Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints—cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy Policy 31:961–976
Azar C, Lindgren K, Larson E, Möllersten K (2006) Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass—costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Clim Chang 74:47–79
Azar C, Lindgren K, Obersteiner M, Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen KMGJ, Möllersten K, Larson ED (2010) The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). Clim Chang 100:195–202
Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2012) A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 3:597–615
Belter CW, Seidel DJ (2013) A bibliometric analysis of climate engineering research. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev Clim Change 4:417–427
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Boucher O, Forster PM, Gruber N, Ha-Duong M, Lawrence MG, Lenton TM, Maas A, Vaughan NE (2014) Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 5:23–35
Faaij A (2006) Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:343–375
Fuss S, Canadell JG, Peters GP, Tavoni M, Andrew RM, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Jones CD, Kraxner F, Nakicenovic N, Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Sharifi A, Smith P, Yamagata Y (2014) Betting on negative emissions. Nat Clim Chang 4:850–853
Fuss S, Jones CD, Kraxner F, Peters GP, Smith P, Tavoni M, van Vuuren DP, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, Milne J, Moreira JR, Nakicenovic N, Sharifi A, Yamagata Y (2016) Research priorities for negative emissions. Environ Res Lett 11:115007
Gibon T, Hertwich EG, Arvesen A, Singh B, Verones F (2017) Health benefits, ecological threats of low-carbon electricity. Environ Res Lett 12:034023
Goyal S, van der Leij MJ, Moraga-González JL (2006) Economics: an emerging small world. J Polit Econ 114:403–412
Greene CH, Huntley ME, Archibald I, Gerber LN, Sills DL, Granados J, Beal CM, Walsh MJ (2017) Geoengineering, marine microalgae, and climate stabilization in the 21st century. Earths Future 5:278–284
Hailey AK, Meerman JC, Larson ED, Loo Y-L (2016) Low-carbon “drop-in replacement” transportation fuels from non-food biomass and natural gas. Appl Energy 183:1722–1730
Haunschild R, Bornmann L, Marx W (2016) Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS One 11:e0160393
Herzog H (2016) Lessons learned from CCS demonstration and large pilot projects, MIT energy initiative working paper MITEI-WP-2016-06
IEA (2013) Technology roadmap—carbon capture and storage. OECD/IEA, Paris
IEA (2016) Twenty years of carbon capture storage. OECD/IEA, Paris
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York
Jackson RB, Canadell JG, Fuss S, Milne J, Nakicenovic N, Tavoni M (2017) Focus on negative emissions. Environ Res Lett 12:110201
Jankó F, Móricz N, Papp Vancsó J (2014) Reviewing the climate change reviewers: exploring controversy through report references and citations. Geoforum 56:17–34
Khorshidi Z, Ho M, Wiley D (2015) Techno-economic evaluation of using biomass-fired auxiliary units for supplying energy requirements of CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 32:24–36
Kraxner F, Aoki K, Leduc S, Kindermann G, Fuss S, Yang J, Yamagata Y, Tak K-I, Obersteiner M (2014a) BECCS in South Korea—analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool. Renew Energy 61:102–108
Kraxner F, Leduc S, Fuss S, Aoki K, Kindermann G, Yamagata Y (2014b) Energy resilient solutions for Japan—a BECCS case study. Energy Procedia 61:2791–2796
Kriegler E, Mouratiadou I, Luderer G, Edmonds J, Edenhofer O (2016) Introduction to the RoSE special issue on the impact of economic growth and fossil fuel availability on climate protection. Clim Chang 136:1–6
Kriegler E, Weyant JP, Blanford GJ, Krey V, Clarke L, Edmonds J, Fawcett A, Luderer G, Riahi K, Richels R, Rose SK, Tavoni M, van Vuuren DP (2014) The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim Chang 123:353–367
Kumar S (2015) Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib J Inf Manag 67:55–73
Li J, Wang M-H, Ho Y-S (2011) Trends in research on global climate change: a science citation index expanded-based analysis. Glob Planet Chang 77:13–20
Linnér B-O, Wibeck V (2015) Dual high-stake emerging technologies: a review of the climate engineering research literature. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:255–268
Liu G, Williams RH, Larson ED, Kreutz TG (2011) Design/economics of low-carbon power generation from natural gas and biomass with synthetic fuels co-production. Energy Procedia 4:1989–1996
Lomax G, Lenton TM, Adeosun A, Workman M (2015) Investing in negative emissions. Nat Clim Chang 5:498–500
Lotze-Campen H, von Lampe M, Kyle P, Fujimori S, Havlik P, van Meijl H, Hasegawa T, Popp A, Schmitz C, Tabeau A, Valin H, Willenbockel D, Wise M (2014) Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison. Agric Econ 45:103–116
Luckow P, Wise MA, Dooley JJ, Kim SH (2010) Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenarios. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:865–877
Mathews JA (2008) Carbon-negative biofuels. Energy Policy 36:940–945
Melin G, Persson O (1996) Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics 36:363–377
Milgram S (1967) The small-world problem. Psychol Today 1:61–67
Minx JC, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Bornmann L, Fuss S (2017) Fast growing research on negative emissions. Environ Res Lett 12:035007
Möllersten K, Yan J (2001) Economic evaluation of biomass-based energy systems with CO2 capture and sequestration in Kraft pulp mills—the influence of the price of CO2 emission quota world. Resour Rev 13:509–525
Möllersten K, Yan JR, Moreira J (2003) Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage—opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 25:273–285
Newman MEJ (2004) Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:5200–5205
Obersteiner M, Azar C, Kossmeier S, Mechler R, Moellersten K, Nilsson S, Read P, Yamagata Y, Yan J (2001) Managing climate risk. Science 294:786–787
Oldham P, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A (2014) Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 372:20140065–20140065
Oreggioni GD, Singh B, Cherubini F, Guest G, Lausselet C, Luberti M, Ahn H, Strømman AH (2017) Environmental assessment of biomass gasification combined heat and power plants with absorptive and adsorptive carbon capture units in Norway. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 57:162–172
Pang M, Zhang L, Liang S, Liu G, Wang C, Hao Y, Wang Y, Xu M (2017) Trade-off between carbon reduction benefits and ecological costs of biomass-based power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) in China. J Clean Prod 144:279–286
Pasgaard M, Strange N (2013) A quantitative analysis of the causes of the global climate change research distribution. Glob Environ Chang 23:1684–1693
Popp A, Dietrich JP, Lotze-Campen H, Klein D, Bauer N, Krause M, Beringer T, Gerten D, Edenhofer O (2011) The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system. Environ Res Lett 6:034017
Porter RTJ, Fairweather M, Pourkashanian M, Woolley RM (2015) The range and level of impurities in CO2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 36:161–174
Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E, Edmonds J, O’Neill BC, Fujimori S, Bauer N, Calvin K, Dellink R, Fricko O, Lutz W, Popp A, Cuaresma JC, KC S, Leimbach M, Jiang L, Kram T, Rao S, Emmerling J, Ebi K, Hasegawa T, Havlik P, Humpenöder F, da Silva LA, Smith S, Stehfest E, Bosetti V, Eom J, Gernaat D, Masui T, Rogelj J, Strefler J, Drouet L, Krey V, Luderer G, Harmsen M, Takahashi K, Baumstark L, Doelman JC, Kainuma M, Klimont Z, Marangoni G, Lotze-Campen H, Obersteiner M, Tabeau A, Tavoni M (2017) The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob Environ Chang 42:153–168
Rochedo P, Costa I, Império C, Hoffmann B, Merschmann P, Oliveira C, Szklo S, Schaeffer R (2016) Carbon capture potential and cost in Brazil. J Clean Prod 131:280–295
Sharifzadeh M, Wang L, Shah N (2015) Integrated biorefineries: CO2 utilization for maximum biomass conversion. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:151–161
Sithole H, Cockerill TT, Hughes KJ, Ingham DB, Ma L, Porter RTJ, Pourkashanian M (2016) Developing an optimal electricity generation mix for the UK 2050 future. Energy 100:363–373
Stanhill G (2001) The growth of climate change science: a scientometric study. Clim Chang 48:515–524
Tavoni M, Tol RSJ (2010) Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy. Clim Chang 100:769–778
Tsiropoulos I, Hoefnagels R, van den Broek M, Patel MK, Faaij APC (2017) The role of bioenergy and biochemicals in CO2 mitigation through the energy system—a scenario analysis for the Netherlands. GCB Bioenergy 9:1489–1509
Uddin SN, Barreto L (2007) Biomass-fired cogeneration systems with CO2 capture and storage. Renew Energy 32:1006–1019
van der Zwaan B, Kober T, Calderon S et al (2014) Energy technology roll-out for climate change mitigation: a multi-model study for Latin America. Energy Econ 56:526–542
van Vuuren DP, Deetman S, van Vliet J, van den Berg M, van Ruijven BJ, Koelbl B (2013) The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling. Clim Chang 118:15–27
van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque JF, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK (2011a) Representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31
van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, Kram T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, Isaac M, Klein Goldewijk K, Hof A, Mendoza Beltran A, Oostenrijk R, van Ruijven B (2011b) RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Clim Chang 109:95–116
Vaughan NE, Gough C (2016) Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver. Environ Res Lett 11:095003
Wallquist L, Seigo SLO, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2012) Public acceptance of CCS system elements: a conjoint measurement. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 6:77–83
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442
Yue D, You F, Snyder SW (2014) Biomass-to-bioenergy and biofuel supply chain optimization: overview, key issues and challenges. Comput Chem Eng 66:36–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 117 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laude, A. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: are short-term issues set aside?. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 25, 185–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09856-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09856-7