Climate change implications for the nest site selection process and subsequent hatching success of a green turtle population

  • Katherine Comer Santos
  • Marielle Livesey
  • Marianne Fish
  • Armando Camargo Lorences
Original Article


Sandy beach habitat where sea turtles nest will be affected by multiple climate change impacts. Before these impacts occur, knowledge of how nest site selection and hatching success vary with beach microhabitats is needed to inform managers on how to protect suitable habitats and prepare for scientifically valid mitigation measures at beaches around the world. At a highly successful green turtle (Chelonia mydas) rookery at Akumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico, we measured microhabitat characteristics along the beach crawl (rejected sites) and related nest site conditions (selected sites) to subsequent hatching success rates for 64 nesting events. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report environmental data along the nesting crawl for a green turtle population and the first to use natural breaks in the data to describe their preferred habitat ranges. Our results indicate that turtles were likely using a combination of cues to find nest sites, mainly higher elevations and lower sand surface temperatures (Kruskal-Wallis test, H = 19.84, p < 0.001; H = 10.78, p < 0.001). Hatching success was significantly and negatively correlated to sand temperature at cloaca depth (Spearman’s ρ = −0.27, p = 0.04). Indeed, the preferred range for cloaca sand temperatures at the nest site (26.3–27.5 °C) had significantly higher hatching success rates compared to the highest temperature range (Tukey HSD = 0.47, p = 0.05). Sand temperatures at various depths were intercorrelated, and surface and cloaca depth sand temperatures were correlated to air temperature (ρ = 0.70, p = 0.00; ρ = 0.26, p = 0.04). Therefore, rising air temperatures could alter sand temperature cues for suitable nest sites, preferred nest site ranges, and produce uneven sex ratios or lethal incubating temperatures. Elevation cues and preferred ranges (1.4–2.5 m) may also be affected by sea level rise, risking inundation of nests.


Climate change Green sea turtles Nest site selection Hatching success Management strategies 



The government permit to allow data collection for this study was under the Centro Ecologico Akumal (CEA). Peter Palmiotto, Department Chair of the Conservation Biology Program, Antioch University New England, was the committee chair for the thesis that was the basis of the paper. Many thanks go to Alma Boada, Volunteer Coordinator, and Mariano Suárez Calleros from CEA for their help, as well as Veronica Pollen from The Science Exchange for helping with field data collection during night patrols. Much appreciation to John Weeks at SDSU and Jeff Seminoff at Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, with assistance on the analysis. Elizabeth Giffen, Communications Manager, and Sue Koscinski, Grants Coordinator at The Science Exchange, helped with editing.


  1. Abreu-Grobois FA, Guzman V, Cuevas E (2005) Memorias del Taller. Rumbo a la COP 3: Diagnóstico del estado de la carey (Eretmochelys imbricata) en la Península de Yucatán y determinacíon de acciones estratégicas SEMARNAT, CONANP, IFAW, PRONATURA Península de Yucatán, WWF, Defenders of WildlifeGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman RA (1997) The nest environment and the embryonic development of sea turtles. In: Lutz PL, Musick JA (eds) The biology of sea turtles. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 83–106Google Scholar
  3. Baker-Gallegos J, Fish MR, Drews C (2009) Temperature monitoring manual guidelines for monitoring sand and incubation temperatures on sea turtle nesting beaches. San Jose, WWF, Costa Rica Cited 15 Jan 2014
  4. Bjorndal KA, Bolten AB (1992) Spatial distribution of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nests at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Copeia 1:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broderick AC, Godley BJ, Hays GC (2001) Metabolic heating and the prediction of sex ratios for green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Physiol Biochem Zool 74:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr A, Carr MH (1972) Site fixity in the Caribbean green turtle. Ecology 53:425–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CEA (Centro Ecogolico de Akumal) (2013) Cited 15 May 2014
  8. Cuevas E, Liceaga-Correa M, Marino-Tapia I (2010) Influence of beach slope and width on hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nesting activity in El Cuyo, Yucatan, Mexico. Chelonian Conserv Biol 9:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daud SK, De Silva M (1987) Nesting site selection of leatherback and green turtles on Terengganu Beach. In: Sasekumar A, Phang SM and Chong EL (eds) Proceedings of the 10th Annual Seminar of the Malaysian Society of Marine Sciences, pp 78–83Google Scholar
  10. Davenport J (1997) Temperature and the life-history strategies of sea turtles. J Therm Biol 22:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckert KL (1987) Environmental unpredictability and leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) nest loss. Herpetologica 43(3):315–323Google Scholar
  12. Fish MR, Cote IM, Gill JA, Jones AP, Renshoff S, Watkinson AR (2005) Predicting the impact of sea-level rise on the Caribbean sea turtle nesting habitat. Conserv Biol 19:482–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flynn, L (2012) Thermal determinants of nest site selection in loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, at Casey Key, Florida. Ph.D. thesis, University of South Florida at St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  14. Fowler LE (1979) Hatching success and nest predation in the green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas, at Tortuguero, Costa Rica. Ecology 60:946–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuentes MMPB, Cinner JE (2010) Using expert opinion to prioritize impacts of climate change on sea turtles’ nesting grounds. J Environ Manag 91:2511–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuentes MMPB, Limpus CJ, Hamann M (2011) Vulnerability of sea turtle nesting grounds to climate change. Glob Chang Biol 17:140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuentes MMPB, Fish M, Maynard JA (2012) Management strategies to mitigate the impacts of climate change on sea turtles terrestrial reproductive phase. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furst N, Baxter A, Lorences Camargo AM, Sanchez Salazar CC, Santos KC (2012) Analysis of nest temperatures and future global warming effects on two coasts of Mexico. In: Jones TT, Wallace BP (compls) Proceedings of the 31st Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA NMFS-SEFSC-631:40, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Garmestani AS, Percival HF, Rice KG, Portier KM (1997) Sea turtle nesting in the Ten Thousands Islands of Florida. Fla Coop Fish and Wildl Res Unit, USGS-Biological Resources Division Tech Rep, vol 56. pp 1-96Google Scholar
  20. Godfrey MH, Mrosovsky N (2006) Pivotal temperature for green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, nesting in Suriname. Herpetol J 16:55–61Google Scholar
  21. Hamann M, Godfrey MH, Seminoff JA, Arthur K et al (2010) Global research priorities for sea turtles: informing management and conservation in the 21st century. Endang Species Res 11:245–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ (2007) Investigating the potential impacts of climate change on a marine turtle population. Glob Chang Biol 13:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkes LA, Broderick AC, Godfrey MH, Godley BJ (2009) Climate change and sea turtles. Endang Species Res 7:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hays AW (2012) Determining the impacts of beach restoration on loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green turtle (Chelonia mydas) nesting patterns and reproductive success along Florida’s Atlantic coast. Master’s Thesis, University of Central Florida at OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  25. Hays GC, MacKay A, Adams CR, Mortimer JA, Speakerman J, Boerema M (1995) Nest site selection by sea turtles. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 75:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horrocks JA, Scott NM (1991) Nest site location and nest success in the hawksbill turtle Eretmochelys imbricata in Barbados, West Indies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2013) Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Jenks GF, Coulson MR (1963) Class intervals for statistical maps. Internat Yearb Cartography 3:119–134Google Scholar
  29. Johannes RE, Rimmer DW (1984) Some distinguishing characteristics of nesting beaches of the green turtle Chelonia mydas on North West Cape Peninsula, Western Australia. Mar Biol 83:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jourdan J, Fuentes MMPB (2015) Effectiveness of strategies at reducing sand temperature to mitigate potential impacts from changes in environmental temperature on sea turtle reproductive output. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20(1):121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kamel SJ, Mrosovsky N (2005) Repeatability of nesting preferences in the hawksbill sea turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata. Anim Behav 70:819–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karavas N, Georghiou K, Arianoutsou M, Dimopoulos D (2005) Vegetation and sand characteristics influencing nesting activity of Caretta caretta on Sekania beach. Biol Conserv 121:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez-Castro MC, Carmona R, Nichols WJ (2004) Nesting characteristics of the olive ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) in Cabo Pulmo, southern Baja California. Mar Biol 145:811–820Google Scholar
  34. Marquez R (1990) Sea turtles of the world: an annotated and illustrated catalogue of sea turtle species known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis No 125, vol 11. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  35. Mc Dermott ML, Godley BJ, Broderick AC, Ediger V, Furness RW (1998) An investigation into the possible effects of physical features of nesting beaches on the nest site selection of C. mydas and C. caretta in Northern Cyprus, Eastern Mediterranean. In: Abreu-Grobois FA, Briseño R, Márquez R, Sarti L (compls) Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Sea Turtle Symposium, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA NMFS-SEFSC-631:202-203, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller J (1999) Determining clutch size and hatching success In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles, IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No 4, pp 124–129Google Scholar
  37. Miller JD, Limpus CJ, Godfrey MH (2003) Nest site selection, oviposition, eggs, development, hatching, and emergence of loggerhead turtles. In: Bolten AB, Witherington BE (eds) Loggerhead sea turtles. Smithson Instit Press, Washington, pp 125–143Google Scholar
  38. Mortimer JA (1990) The influence of beach sand characteristics on the nesting behavior and clutch survival of green turtles (Chelonia mydas). Copeia 3:802–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mortimer JA (1999) Reducing threats to eggs and hatchlings: hatcheries. In: Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles. In: Eckert KL, Bjorndal KA, Abreu-Grobois FA, Donnelly M (eds) Research and management techniques for the conservation of sea turtles, IUCN/SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Group Publication No 4, pp 175-178Google Scholar
  40. Patino-Martinez J, Marco A, Quiñones L, Hawkes L (2012) A potential tool to mitigate the impacts of climate change to the Caribbean leatherback sea turtle. Glob Chang Biol 18(2):401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poloczanska ES, Limpus CJ, Hays GC (2009) Vulnerability of marine turtles to climate change. In: Sims DW (ed) Advances in marine biology, vol 56. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 151–211Google Scholar
  42. Rees AF, Margaritoulis D (2004) Beach temperatures, incubation durations and estimated hatchling sex ratio for loggerhead sea turtle nests in southern Kyparissia Bay, Greece. Testudo 6(1):23–36Google Scholar
  43. Santos KC, Tague C, Alberts A, Franklin J (2006) Sea turtle nesting habitat on the US Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba: a comparison of habitat suitability index models. Chelonian Conserv Biol 5:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlacher TA, Schoeman DS, Dugan J, Lastra M, Jones A, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Mar Ecol 29((Suppl)):70–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seminoff JA (2013) Chelonia mydas In: IUCN 2013 IUCN red list of threatened species Version 20132 Cited 4 March 2014
  46. Stoneburner DL, Richardson JI (1981) Observations on the role of temperature in loggerhead turtle nest site selection. Copeia 1:238–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turkozan O, Yamamoto K, Yilmaz C (2011) Nest site preference and hatching success of green (Chelonia mydas) and loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtles at Akyatan Beach, Turkey. Chelonian Conserv Biol 10:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varela-Acevedo E, Eckert KL, Eckert SA, Cambers G, Horrocks JA (2009) Sea turtle nesting beach characterization manual In: Examining the effects of changing coastline processes on Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) nesting habitat, Duke University, Beaufort, NC, pp 46‐97Google Scholar
  49. Wang HC, Cheng IJ (1999) Breeding biology of the green turtle, Chelonia mydas (Reptilia: Cheloniidae), on Wan-An Island, PengHu archipelago. Mar Biol 133:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weishampel JF, Bagley DA, Ehrhart LM (2004) Earlier nesting by loggerhead sea turtles following sea surface warming. Glob Chang Biol 10:1424–1427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood DW, Bjorndal KA (2000) Relation of temperature, moisture, salinity, and slope to nest site selection in loggerhead sea turtles. Copeia 1:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woody K, Horrocks JA, Vermeer LA (1998) Factors influencing within-beach nest distribution in hawksbill turtles. In: Abreu-Grobois FA, Briseño R, Márquez R, Sarti L (compls) Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Sea Turtle Symposium, NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA NMFS-SEFSC-631:170-171, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, MexicoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Comer Santos
    • 1
  • Marielle Livesey
    • 2
  • Marianne Fish
    • 3
  • Armando Camargo Lorences
    • 4
  1. 1.The Science Exchange International Internship Program and San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Antioch University New EnglandKeeneUSA
  3. 3.WWF CanadaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Comité Estatal de Tortugas Marinas de Quintana Roo (CETMQROO)Municipio de TulumMéxico

Personalised recommendations