Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measures to limit greenhouse gas concentrations will result in dramatic changes to energy and land systems and in turn alter the character of human requirements for water. We employ the global change assessment model (GCAM), an integrated assessment model, to explore the interactions of energy, land, and water systems under combinations of three alternative radiative forcing stabilization levels and two carbon tax regimes. The paper analyzes two important research questions: i) how large may global irrigation water demands become over the next century, and ii) what are the potential impacts of emissions mitigation policies on global irrigation-water withdrawals. We find that increasing population and economic growth could more than double the demand for water for agricultural systems in the absence of climate policy, and policies to mitigate climate change further increase agricultural demands for water. The largest increases in agricultural irrigation water demand occur in scenarios where only fossil fuel emissions are priced (but not land use change emissions) and are primarily driven by rapid expansion in bio-energy production. Regions such as China, India, and other countries in South and East Asia are likely to experience the greatest increases in water demands. Finally, we test the sensitivity of water withdrawal demands to the share of bio-energy crops under irrigation and conclude that many regions have insufficient space for heavy bio-energy crop irrigation in the future—a result that calls into question the physical possibility of producing the associated biomass energy, especially under climate policy scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcamo J, Florke M, Marker M (2007) Future long term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrol Sci J 52:247–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquastat: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/water_use_agr/index5.stm, as accessed on August 2, 2011

  • Azar C (2005) Emerging scarcities–bioenergy-food competition in a carbon constrained world. In: Simpson R, et al. (eds) Scarcity and growth revisited, resources for the future. pp 98–119

  • Berndes G (2002) Bioenergy and water- the implications of large scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Glob Environ Chang 12:253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndes G (2008) Water demand for global bioenergy production: trends, risks and opportunities. WBGU, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050. Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Economic and Social Development Department

  • Calvin K, Edmonds J, Bond-Lamberty B, Clarke L, Kim SH, Kyle P, Smith SJ, Thomson A, Wise M (2009) 2.6: limiting climate change to 450 ppm CO2 equivalent in the 21st century. Energy Econ 31(2):S107–S120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzadilla A, Rehdanz K, Tol RSJ (2010) The economic impact of more sustainable water use in agriculture: a computable general equilibrium analysis. J Hydrol 384:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2004) Water footprints of nations. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Research report series no. 16

  • Chaturvedi V, Hejazi MI, Edmonds JA, Clarke LE, Kyle GP, Davies E, Wise MA, Calvin KV (2013) Climate policy implications for agricultural water demand. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Technical Report PNNL- 22356. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA

  • Clarke L, Lurz J, Wise M, Edmonds J, Kim S, Pitcher H, Smith S (2007) Model documentation for the MiniCAM climate change science program stabilization scenarios. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Technical Report PNNL-16735, CCSP Product 2.1a; U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, WA, USA

  • Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Econ 31(2):S64–S81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Fraiture C, Wichelns D (2010) Satisfying future water demands for agriculture. Agric Water Manag 97(4):502–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P (2004) Impact of climate change and variability on irrigation requirements: a global perspective. Clim Chang 54:269–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Seibert S (2002) Global modeling of irrigation water requirements. Water Resour Res 38(4):8.1–8.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270(1–2):105–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds J, Reilly J (1985) Global energy: assessing the future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds J, Calvin K, Clarke L, Kyle P, Wise M (2012) Energy and technology lessons since Rio. Energy Econ 34:S7–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehhalt D et al (2001) Chapter 4. Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader M, Rost S, Muller C, Bondeau A, Gerten D (2010) Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: present and potential future patterns. J Hydrol 384(3–4):218–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2003) Agriculture, food and water. A contribution to the World Water Development report

  • Fischer G, Tubiello FN, van Velthuizen H, Wiberg DA (2007) Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirement: effects of mitigation, 1990–2080. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74:1083–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52(2):143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH (2009) The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bioenergy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 68:1052–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham KT, Smith SJ, Sands RD (2008) Impact of bioenergy crops in a carbon dioxide constrained world: an application of the MiniCAM energy-agriculture and land use model. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:675–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassi G, den Elzen MGJ, Hof AF, Pilli R, Federici S (2012) The role of land use, land use change and forestry sector in achieving Annex I reduction pledges. Clim Chang 115:873–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanasaki N, Inuzuka T, Kanae S, Oki T (2010) An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model. J Hydrol 384(3–4):232–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanjra MA, Qureshi ME (2010) Global water crisis and food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 35(5):365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi M, Edmonds J, Clarke L, Kyle P, Davies E, Chaturvedi V, Wise M, Patel P, Eom J, Calvin K, Moss R, Kim S (2013) Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, In press, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.006 doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.006#doilink

  • Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1109936109

  • Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39:137–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC-AR4 (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report, contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Core writing team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, p 104

  • IPCC (2011) IPCC Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Prepared by working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlömer S, von Stechow C (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p. 1075

  • Kyle P, Luckow P, Calvin K, Emanuel W, Nathan M, Zhou Y (2011). GCAM 3.0 agriculture and land use: data sources and methods. http://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/images/2/25/GCAM_AgLU_Data_Documentation.pdf

  • Leaky ADB, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR (2009) Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot 60(10):2859–2876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yang H (2010) Spatially explicit assessment of global consumptive water use in cropland. J Hydrol 384(3–4):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckow P, Wise MA, Dooley JJ, Kim SH (2010) Large-scale utilization of biomass energy and carbon dioxide capture and storage in the transport and electricity sectors under stringent CO2 concentration limit scenarios. Int J Greenh Gas Control 4:865–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCalla AF (2001) Challenges to world agriculture in the 21st Century. UPDATE: Agriculture and Resource Economics 4(3), University of California, Davis, USA

  • McCarl BA, Schneider UA (2001) Greenhouse gas mitigation in U.S. agriculture and forestry. Science 294:2481–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 47, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1577–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Reilly JM, Kicklighter DW, Gurgel AC, Cronin TW, Paltsev S, Felzer BS, Wang X, Sokolov AP, Schlosser CA (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326(5958):1397–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molden D et al (2007) Trends in water and agricultural development. In: Molden D (ed) Water for food water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan, London, pp 57–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Hertel T (2009) Global agricultural land use data for climate change analysis. In: Hertel T, Rose S, Tol R (eds) Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy. Routledge

  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdogan M (2011) Exploring the potential contribution of irrigation to global agriculture primary productivity. Global Biogeochem Cycles 25, GB3016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck S, Wan W (1996) Analytic solutions of simple greenhouse gas emission models. In: Van Ierland E, Gorka K (eds) Economics of atmospheric pollution. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel S (1998) Water for food production: will there be enough in 2025? BioScience 48(8):629–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271(5250):785–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstrom J, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Hoff H, Rost S, Gerten D (2009) Future water availability for global food production: the potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resour Res 45(7):W00A12

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokityanskiy D, Benítez PC, Kraxner F, McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Rametsteiner E, Yamagata Y (2007) Geographically explicit global modeling of land use change, carbon sequestration, and biomass supply. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74(7):1057–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant MW, Cai X, Cline SA (2002) Global water outlook to 2025: averting an impending crisis. International Food Policy Research Institute and International Institute of Water Management

  • Rosegrant MW, Msangi S, Ringler C, Sulser TB, Zhu T, Cline SA (2008) International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): model description. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. <http://www.ifpri.org/themes/impact/impactwater.pdf>

  • Rost S, Gerten D, Bondeau A, Lucht W, Rohwer J, Schaphoff S (2008) Agriculture green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resour Res 44, W09405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz C, Lotze-Campen H, Gerten D, Dietrich PJ, Bodirsky B, Beiwald A, Popp A (2013) Blue water scarcity and the economic impacts of future agricultural trade and demand. Water Resources Research, Accepted

  • Seibert T, Döll P (2010) Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop water production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. J Hydrol 384:198–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Oki T, Utsumi N, Kanae S, Hanasaki N (2008) Projection of future world water resources under SRES scenarios: water withdrawal. Hydrol Sci J 53:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiklomanov IA (2000) World water use & water availability. State Hydrological Institute (SHI). (http://webworld.unesco.org/water/ihp/db/shiklomanov/part’3/_Read’me.html)

  • Syri S, Lehtila A, Ekholm T, Savolainen I, Holttinen H, Peltola E (2008) Global energy and emission scenarios for effective climate change mitigation- deterministic and stochastic scenarios with the TIAM model. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2(2):274–285

    Google Scholar 

  • The 2030 Water Resources Group (2009) Charting our water future: economic frameworks to inform decision making. Accessed on January 2011 from http://www.mckinsey.com/en/Client_Service/Sustainability/Latest_thinking/Charting_our_water_future.aspx

  • Thomson A, Calvin K, Smith S, Kyle G, Volke A, Patel P, Delgado-Arias S, Bond-Lamberty B, Wise M, Clarke L, Edmonds J (2011) RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Clim Chang 109:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren D, Edmonds JA, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson AM, Hibbard KA, Hurtt G, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque JF, Masui T, Meinhausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese S (2007) Biofuels and global water challenges. Institute for Agriculture Trade and Policy, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise MA, Calvin K (2011) GCAM 3.0 agriculture and land use modeling: technical description of modeling approach. https://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/images/8/87/GCAM3AGTechDescript12_5_11.pdf

  • Wise MA, Calvin KV, Thomson AM, Clarke LE, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands RD, Smith SJ, Janetos AJ, Edmonds JA (2009) The implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisser D, Frolking S, Douglas EM, Fekete BM, Vorosmarty CJ, Schumann AH (2008) Global irrigation water demand: uncertainties arising from agricultural and climate data sets. Geophys Res Lett 35, L24408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisser D, Frolking S, Douglas EM, Fekete BM, Schumann AH, Vorosmarty CJ (2010) The significance of local water resources captured in small reservoirs for crop production- a global scale analysis. J Hydrol 384(3–4):264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WRI (World Resources Institute) (2000) Water resources and freshwater ecosystems—agricultural inputs: water use intensity, http://earthtrends.wri.org/searchable_db/index.php?theme=2 (Accessed 2011)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for research support provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The authors acknowledge long-term support for GCAM development from the Integrated Assessment Research Program in the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy. The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaibhav Chaturvedi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaturvedi, V., Hejazi, M., Edmonds, J. et al. Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 20, 389–407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9497-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9497-4

Keywords

Navigation