Implications of a changing climate on food security and smallholders’ livelihoods in Bogotá, Colombia

  • Anton Eitzinger
  • Peter Läderach
  • Christian Bunn
  • Audberto Quiroga
  • Andreas Benedikter
  • Antonio Pantoja
  • Jason Gordon
  • Michele Bruni
Original Article


Small farmers who supply the city of Bogotá with food are facing many challenges that are jeopardizing their livelihoods and by extension, the food security of Colombia’s capital. We expect future changes in climatic conditions to exacerbate the plight of the small farmers and this is expected to compromise Bogota’s food security even further. This paper specifically seeks to assess the impact of climate change (CC) on the livelihoods of smallholders who supply Bogota with most of its food. In our multidisciplinary methodology, we translated the exposure to CC into direct impact on crops and assessed sensitivity and adaptive capacity using the sustainable rural livelihoods framework. The results show that rainfall (by average of 100 mm) and temperature (by average of 2.1 °C) will increase over the study area, while the future climate suitability of the most important crops such as mango (Mangifera indica), papaya (Carica papaya), corn (Zea mays) and plantain (Musa balbisiana) shows a decrease of 19 % to 47 % climate suitability by the year 2050. The assessment of sensitivity and adaptive capacity demonstrates that farmers participating in a farmers’ market, initiated by several local and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs), are less vulnerable to CC than farmers who sell through intermediaries. Those farmers selling directly to consumers in the farmers’ market have a higher adaptive capacity (3 on a scale of 3) in social and financial capital than those selling to intermediaries with less adaptive capacity (1 on a scale of 3). In light of the reduction in overall climatic suitability of some of the major crops and the change of geographic location of suitability for others, there are likely to be serious threats for Bogotá’s food security, the ecological landscape around the city, and farmers’ livelihoods. We further conclude that unless proper adaptation measures are implemented, the geographical shift in climate suitability may also force farmers to shift their crops to higher elevations including remaining forests and páramos (the Colombian alpine tundra ecosystems), which may be threatened in the near future.


Colombia Bogotá Climate change Crop climate-suitability Food security Vulnerability 



The authors thank the participating farmer of the departments of Boyacá and Cundinamarca, local government agencies, NGOs and private institutions who made this research possible. The author also wish to acknowledge the kind support through the global program on Climate Change Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS,


  1. Amnesty International (2009) Everything left behind: internal displacement in Colombia. London, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhandari BB (2003) Module 4: Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). Kamiyamaguchi, JapanGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22:953–969. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin R (2001) Climate change and food security. Agric Inf Bull 765:1–2Google Scholar
  5. Epstein PR, Diaz HF, Elias S et al (1998) Biological and physical signs of climate change: focus on mosquito-borne diseases. Am Meteorol Soc 79:409–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2000) The Ecocrop database. RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO (2003) Trade reforms and food security. RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. FAO (2009) The state of food and agriculture. RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrington J, Carney D, Ashley C, Turton C (1999) Sustainable livelihoods in practice: early applications of concepts in rural areas. Development 42:189–200Google Scholar
  10. Githeko AK, Lindsay SW, Confalonieri UE, Patz JA (2000) Climate change and vector-borne diseases: a regional analysis. Bull World Health Organ 78:1136–1147Google Scholar
  11. Godfrey C (2009) Food and nutritional security. National dialogue poverty reduction and adaptation to climate change. United Nations Development Programme, Bogotá, p 4Google Scholar
  12. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E (2001) Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data. 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genet Resour Newsl 127:15–19Google Scholar
  13. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Glob Environ Chang 21:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2001) IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate change 2001 (TAR). Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007) IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 (AR4). Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarvis A, Ramirez J, Anderson B et al (2010) Scenarios of climate change within the context of agriculture. Climate change and crop production. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarvis A, Lau C, Cook S et al (2011) An Integrated adaptation and mitigation framework for developing agricultural research: synergies and trade-offs. Exp Agric 47:185–203. doi: 10.1017/S0014479711000123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones P, Thornton P (2003) The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Glob Environ Chang 13:51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00090-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee RA (2002) Interactive design of farm conversion: linking agricultural research and farmer learning for sustainable small scale horticulture production in Colombia. Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C et al (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science (New York, NY) 319:607–610. doi: 10.1126/science.1152339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science (New York, NY) 333:616–620. doi: 10.1126/science.1204531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ludi E (2009) Climate change, water and food security—ODI Background Note. ODI Background Notes 8Google Scholar
  24. Magrin G, Gay Garcia C (2007) Latin America. Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution ofWorking Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, pp 581–615Google Scholar
  25. Montoya G, Mondragón H (2010) Los mercados campesinos: comercializatión alternativa de alimentos en Bogotá. Cuadernos Tierra y Justicia 2Google Scholar
  26. Parry M (2007) The implications of climate change for crop yields, global food supply and risk of hunger. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research 4:1–44Google Scholar
  27. Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A (2010) Downscaling global circulation model outputs: the delta method decision and policy analysis Working Paper No. 1. Policy AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramirez-Villegas J, Jarvis A, Läderach P (2011) Empirical approaches for assessing impacts of climate change on agriculture: the EcoCrop model and a case study with grain sorghum. Agr Forest Meteorol. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.005
  29. Ramirez-Villegas J, Salazar M, Jarvis A, Navarro-Racines CE (2012) A way forward on adaptation to climate change in Colombian agriculture: perspectives towards 2050. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0500-y
  30. Rochin RI (1977) Rural poverty and the problem of increasing food production on small farms: The case of Colombia. West J Agric Econ 1:181–186Google Scholar
  31. Rodriguez B (2004) Bogotá sin hambre: una oportunidad para reconocer el papel central de los campesinos en la construcción de Colombia. Bogotá, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19703–19708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701976104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis: IDS Working Paper 72, pp 1–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Eitzinger
    • 1
  • Peter Läderach
    • 2
  • Christian Bunn
    • 3
  • Audberto Quiroga
    • 1
  • Andreas Benedikter
    • 1
  • Antonio Pantoja
    • 1
  • Jason Gordon
    • 4
  • Michele Bruni
    • 5
  1. 1.International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)CaliColombia
  2. 2.International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)ManaguaNicaragua
  3. 3.Humboldt University (Faculty of Agriculture and Horticulture)BerlinGermany
  4. 4.University of West Indies (UWI)KingstonJamaica
  5. 5.Oxfam GB - Latin America Caribbean RegionMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations