Skip to main content

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation plus (REDD+) in the Philippines: will it make a difference in financing forest development?

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.


There is a high level of interest in reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation plus (REDD+) carbon (C) financing as a way to accelerate forest conservation and development. However, there is very limited information on the potential costs and benefits of REDD+ in developing countries like the Philippines. In this paper, we estimated the range of likely financial benefits of REDD+ implementation in the country under various forest degradation and mitigation scenarios. Our findings show that reducing the rate of forest degradation by a modest 5 to 15 % annually while increasing the doubling the rate of reforestation to 1.5 % annually could reduce C emissions by up to about 60 million t C by 2030. These are equivalent to US$ 97 to 417 million of mean C credits annually at US$ 5 per ton C. These figures are much higher than the total budget of the government and official development assistance for forestry activities in the country which amounted to US$ 46 million in 2005 and US$ 12 million in 2006, respectively. We conclude that REDD+ C credits could be a significant source of financing for forestry projects in developing countries like the Philippines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Australian Center for International Agricultural Research ACIAR (2000) Bringing trees back in the Philippines, research note

  2. Barr CM, Sayer J (2012) The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in Asia–Pacific: critical issues for REDD+. Biol Conserv. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.020

  3. Bautista GM (1990) The forestry crisis in the Philippines: nature, causes and issues. Dev Econ 28(1):67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borlagdan SB, Guiang ES, Pulhin JM (2001) Community-based forest management in the Philippines: a preliminary assessment. Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chokkalingm U, Carandang AP, Pulhin JM, Lasco RD, Peras RJJ, Toma T (2006) One century of forest rehabilitation in the Philippines: approaches, outcomes and lessons. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor Barat

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conservation International (2011) Biodiversity hotspots: Philippines. Accessed 9 March 2011

  7. Denman KL, Brasseur G, Chidthaisong A, Ciasis P, Cox PM, Dickinson RE, Hauglustaine D et al (2007) Couplings between changes in the climate system and biochemistry. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Durst PB (2005) Impacts and effectiveness of logging bans in natural forests in Asia-Pacific. Paper presented to the Philippine Forestry Development Forum. 2–3 June 2005, Philippines

  9. Food Agriculture Organization (2011) State of the World’s Forest. Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy

  10. Food Agriculture Organization (2005). Global Forest Resource Assessment 15 Key Findings . Food and Agr icultural Organization . Retrieved from: Accessed Feb 2010

  11. Food Agriculture Organization (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010 key findings. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  12. Food and Agricultural Organization (1989) Review of forest management systems of tropical Asia: case studies of natural forest management for timber production in India, Malaysia and Philippines. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  13. Food and Agriculture Organization (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005, Forestry Paper No 147. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome

    Google Scholar 

  14. Foreign-Assisted and Special Projects (2006) Annual report. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forest Management Bureau (FMB) (2007) Philippine forestry statistics: forest cover within forest lands: 2003. Forest Management Bureau, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harris NL, Brown S, Hagen SC, Saatchi SS, Petrova S, Salas W, Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Lotsch A (2012) Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336:1573–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison S, Emtage NF, Nasayao EE (2004) Past and present forestry support programs in the Philippines, and lessons for the future. Small Scale For Econ Manag Policy 3(3):303–317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoang MH, Do TH, Pham MT, van Noordwijk M, Minang PA (2012) Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.013

  19. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Treanton K, Mamaty I, Bonduki Y, Griggs DJ, Callander BA (eds) (1997) Greenhouse gas inventory workbook, intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, pp 5.1–5.54

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kindermann G, Obersteiner M, Sohngen B, Sathaye J, Andrasko K, Rametsteiner E, Schlamadinger B, Wunder S, Beach R (2008) Global costestimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided defores tation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

  21. Kummer DM (1992) Deforestation in the postwar Philippines. Ateneo de Manila University Press, Quezon City

    Google Scholar 

  22. La Vina, Antonio GM, Ang L, Dulce J (2011) The Cancun agreements: do they advance global cooperation on climate change? Working Paper, London: Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development, Cited February 2011

  23. Lasco RD, Pulhin FB (2001) Forestry mitigation options in the Philippines: application of the COMAP model. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 6:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lasco RD, Pulhin FB (2003) Philippine forest ecosystems and climate change: carbon stocks, rate of sequestration and the Kyoto protocol. Ann Trop Res 25(2):37–51

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lasco RD, Pulhin FB (2009) Carbon budgets of forest ecosystems in the Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag 12(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lasco RD, Visco RG, Pulhin JM (2001) Secondary forests in the Philippines: formation and transformation in the 20th century. J Trop For Sci 13:652–670

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lasco RD, Lales JS, Arnuevo MT, Guillermo IQ, de Jesus AC, Medrano R, Bajar OF, Mendoza CV (2002) Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage and sequstration of land cover in the Leyte Geothermal Reservation. Renew Energy 25:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lasco RD, MacDicken K, Pulhin FB, Guillermo IQ, Sales RF, Cruz RVO (2006) Carbon stocks assessment of a selectively logged dipterocarp forest and wood processing mill in the Philippines. J Trop For Sci 18:212–221

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lasco RD, Evangelista RS, Pulhin FB (2010) Potential of community-based forest management (CBFM) to mitigate climate change in the Philippines. Small Scale For J 9:429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Leonida A, Bugayong, Mendoza MD (2011) An assessment of potential benefits to small holders of REDD+ components in the Philippines. Ann Trop Res 33:31–48

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu DS, Iverson LI, Brown S (1993) Rates and pattern of deforestation in the Philippines: application of geographic information system analysis. For Ecol Manag 57:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Llanos RE, Feather C (2011) The reality of REDD+ in Peru: between theory and practice. Interethnic Association for the Development of the Peruvian Amazon (AIDESEP), Lima, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manila Observatory (2010) Final report: Philippine greenhouse gas inventory for the year 2000 and measures to mitigate climate change component. Manila Observatory, Manila, p 527

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moya TB, Malayang BS III (2004) Climate variability and deforestation-reforestation dynamics in the Philippines. Environ Dev Sustain 6:261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz WA, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath MH, Sanz-Sanchez MJS, Zhang X (2007) Forestry. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 541–584

    Google Scholar 

  36. NSO (2009) Census and Housing Population. National Statistics Office, Philippines. Retrieved from: Accessed Dec 2009

  37. PAWB (2009) Assessing progress towards the 2010 biodiversity target: the 4th national report to the convention on biological diversity. Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau (PAWB), DENR, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  38. Phelps J, Guerrero MC, Dalabajan DA, Young B, Webb EL (2010) What makes a “REDD” country? Glob Environ Chang 20(2):322–332. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Phelps J, Friess D, Webb EL (2012) Win–win REDD+ approaches belie carbon–biodiversity trade-offs. Biol Conserv. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.031

  40. Philippines’ Initial National Communication (1999) The Philippines’ Initial National Communication on Climate Change, Manila, Philippines, p 91

  41. Pulhin JM (2002) Trends in forest policy of the Philippines, Policy Trend Report, pp 29–41

  42. Rebugio LL, Cruz RVO, Lasco RD, Calderon MM, Carandang WM, Tolentino EL Jr, Visco RG, dela Cruz LU, Dizon JT, Pulhin RG, Dalmacio RV, Camacho LD, Bantayan NC (2005) Forest restoration in the Philippines: a review of research and development initiatives. ASEAN-Korea Environmental Cooperation Unit

  43. Sajise PE (1998) Forest policy in the Philippines: a winding trail towards participatory sustainable development. The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies

  44. Stavins R, Richards K (2005) The cost of U.S. forest-based carbon sequestration. Pew Center report

  45. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press

  46. The Philippines REDD-plus Strategy Team (2010) The Philippine National REDD-plus strategy, Manila, Philippines, p 97, Cited May 2012

  47. UN-REDD Programme (2010) National programme document—the Philippines. UN-REDD Programme 5th Policy Board Meeting. 4–5 November 2010, Washington D.C., USA. From Cited May 2012

  48. Viana V (2009) Financing REDD: meshing markets with government funds, Cited October 2010

  49. Villamor GB, Lasco RD (2009) Rewarding upland people for forest conservation experience and lessons learned from case studies in the Philippines. J Sustain For 28:304–321. doi:10.1080/10549810902791499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Westholm L, Biddulph R, Hellmark I, Ekbom A (2011) REDD + and TENURE: a review of the latest developments in research, implementation and debate. Focali, Gothenburd, p 31

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We express our gratitude to the support provided by the following ICRAF projects in the conduct of the study: the IFAD-supported RUPES project and the Alternatives to Slash and Burn (ASB) program. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the paper.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodel D. Lasco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lasco, R.D., Veridiano, R.K.A., Habito, M. et al. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation plus (REDD+) in the Philippines: will it make a difference in financing forest development?. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 1109–1124 (2013).

Download citation


  • Carbon
  • Financing
  • Forest
  • Mitigation
  • Philippines
  • REDD+