Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of co-benefits for traditional air pollutants made possible through global climate policies using the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model in the time horizon up to 2050. The impact analysis is based on projections of energy consumption provided by the Prospective Outlook for the Long term Energy System (POLES) model for a scenario without any global greenhouse gas mitigation efforts, and for a 2°C climate policy scenario which assumes internationally coordinated action to mitigate climate change. Outcomes of the analysis are reported globally and for key world regions: the European Union (EU), China, India and the United States. The assessment takes into account current air pollution control legislation in each country. Expenditures on air pollution control under the global climate mitigation regime are reduced in 2050 by 250 billion € when compared to the case without climate measures. Around one third of financial co-benefits estimated world-wide in this study by 2050 occur in China, while an annual cost saving of 35 billion (Euros) € is estimated for the EU if the current air pollution legislation and climate policies are adopted in parallel. Health impacts of air pollution are quantified in terms of loss of life expectancy related to the exposure from anthropogenic emissions of fine particles, as well as in terms of premature mortality due to ground-level ozone. For example in China, current ambient concentrations of particulate matter are responsible for about 40 months-losses in the average life expectancy. In 2050, the climate strategies reduce this indicator by 50 %. Decrease of ozone concentrations estimated for the climate scenario might save nearly 20,000 cases of premature death per year. Similarly significant are reductions of impacts on ecosystems due to acidification and eutrophication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Units used in this paper: barrel (bl), billion (109), degree Celsius (°C), Euro (€), exajoule (EJ = 1018 J), gigatons (Gt = 109 t), megatons (Mt = 106 t), micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3), US dollar ($).

References

  • Amann M, Bertok I, Borken J, Chambers A, Cofala J, Dentener F, Heyes C, Kejun J, Klimont Z, Makowski M, Matur R, Purohit P, Rafaj P, Sandler R, Schöpp W, Wagner F, Winiwarter W (2008a) GAINS-Asia. A tool to combat air pollution and climate change simultaneously. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Amann M, Bertok I, Cofala J, Heyes C, Klimont Z, Rafaj P, Schöpp W, Wagner F (2008b) National Emission Ceilings for 2020 based on the 2008 Climate & Energy Package. NEC Scenario Analysis Report #6. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Amann M, Bertok I, Borken-Kleefeld J, Cofala J, Heyes C, Höglund-Isaksson L, Klimont Z, Nguyen B, Posch M, Rafaj P, Sandler R, Schöpp W, Wagner F, Winiwarter W (2011) Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications. Environ Model Software. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.012

  • Barker T, Bashmakov I, Alharthi A, Amann M, Cifuentes L, Drexhage J, Duan M, Edenhofer O, Flannery B, Grubb M, Hoogwijk M, Ibitoye F, Jepma C, Pizer W, Yamaji K (2007) Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2006) World Energy Technology Outlook—WETO H2. EUR22038, Directorate-General for Research, Directorate Energy of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

  • CEC (2007) Communication from the commission to the council, the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius. The way ahead for 2020 and beyond. COM/2007/0002-final. Commission of the European communities, Brussels, Belgium

  • CEC (2008) Impact assessment. Document accompanying the Package of Implementation measures for the EU’s objectives on climate change and renewable energy for 2020. SEC2008(85/3), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium

  • CEC (2009a) Communication “Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen”. COM/2009/39-final. Commission of the Europan Communities, Brussels, Belgium

  • CEC (2009b) Commission staff working document accompanying the communication—Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen—Extensive background information and analysis—Part 1, Part 2. SEC(2009)101, Commission of the Europan Communities, Brussels, Belgium

  • Cofala J, Amann M, Klimont Z, Kupiainen K, Hoglund-Isaksson L (2007) Scenarios of global anthropogenic emissions of air pollutants and methane until 2030. Atmos Environ 41:8486–8499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cofala J, Rafaj P, Schöpp W, Klimont Z, Borken-Kleefeld J, Amann M (2010) Emissions of Air Pollutants for the World Energy Outlook 2010 Energy Scenarios. Final Report to International Energy Agency. . International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

  • DieselNet (2010) Emission Standards—Summary of worldwide diesel emission standards. http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/

  • Holland M, Amann M, Heyes C, Rafaj P, Schöpp W, Hunt A, Watkiss P (2011) The Reduction in Air Quality Impacts and Associated Economic Benefits of Mitigation Policy. Summary of Results from the EC RTD ClimateCost Project. In: Watkiss P. (ed) The ClimateCost Project. Final Report. Volume 1: Europe. Published by the Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden

  • IEA CCC (2010) IEA Clean Coal Centre|Coal Power. Coal Power Database. http://www.iea-coal.org/site/2010/database-section/coal-power?

  • IEA (2011) World energy outlook 2011. International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2008) World Economic Outlook. October 2008. Financial stress, downturns, and recoveries. World economic and financial surveys. International Monetary Fund, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen G, Amann M, Berglund C, Cofala J, Höglund-Isaksson L, Heyes C, Mechler R, Tohka A, Schöpp W, Winiwarter W (2004) The Extension of the RAINS Model to Greenhouse Gases. IR-04-015. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

  • Klimont Z, Cofala J, Xing J, Wei W, Zhang C, Wang S, Kejun J, Bhandari P, Mathur R, Purohit P, Rafaj P, Chambers A, Amann M, Hao J (2009) Projections of SO2, NOx and carbonaceous aerosols emissions in Asia. Tellus B 61:602–617. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2009.00428.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafaj P, Rao S, Klimont Z, Kolp P, Schöpp W (2010) Emissions of air pollutants implied by global long-term energy scenarios. IR-10-019. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

  • Russ P, Wiesenthal T, Van Regemorter D, Ciscar J-C (2007) Global Climate Policy Scenarios for 2030 and beyond—Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Pathway Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. JRC Reference report, EUR23032EN. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies IPTS JRC, Seville, Spain

  • Russ P, Ciscar J-C, Saveyn B, Soria A, Szabo L, Van Ierland T, Van Regemorter D, Virdis R (2009) Economic Assessment of Post-2012 Global Climate Policies—Analysis of Gas Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Scenarios with the POLES and GEM-E3 models. Joint Research Centre of the European Community, Seville, Spain. doi:10.2791/7033

  • UN (2009) World Population Prospects, The 2008 Revision. Working Paper, ESA/P/WP.210. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York, U.S

  • UNFCCC (1998) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Climate change secretariat of UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany

  • UNFCCC (2009) Copenhagen Accord of 18 December 2009, Decision CP.15. FCCC/CP/2009/L.7. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland

  • UNFCCC (2010) Report of the Conference of the parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. FCCC/CP/2009/11. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland

  • van Aardenne JA, Dentener F, Dingenen RV, Maenhout G, Marmer E, Vignati E, Russ P, Szabo L, Raes F (2010) Climate and air quality impacts of combined climate change and air pollution policy scenarios. Scientific and Technical Research series, EUR 24572 EN. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg

  • WHO (2006) Air quality guidelines. Global update, 2005. Particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research presented here has been carried out within the ClimateCost (the Full Costs of Climate Change) project, funded from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme. Authors wish to thank journal’s reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Rafaj.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rafaj, P., Schöpp, W., Russ, P. et al. Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 801–824 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9390-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9390-6

Keywords