Advertisement

Community action planning in East Delhi: a participatory approach to build urban disaster resilience

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The paper addresses disaster risk of an urban community in a mega city, which experiences high risk to natural hazards. The Community Action Planning (CAP) tool is used in this case. It has been developed from five resilience dimensions (physical, social, economic, institutional, and natural), 25 parameters and 75 actions. A detailed CAP structured questionnaire survey was conducted with 89 Residential and Welfare Associations (RWAs) in East Delhi, India situated in three types of settlements: planned Delhi Development Authority (DDA) housing and societies, colonies, and urban villages. The result identifies and prioritizes 32 actions as important for all three settlements. The result shows both consistent and inconsistent responses from RWAs. To give some examples, parameter S3 is “tasks to reduce number of people suffer from water borne diseases after a disaster”. In response to this parameter, approximately 80% of total respondents prioritized action (A1), “promoting people to take preventive measures after a disaster”. It shows consistent response from all three settlements. However, parameter S5 is “tasks to improve the awareness and knowledge about threat and impact of disasters”. Approximately 40% of total respondents prioritized A1, “organizing training program for awareness and knowledge building”. This action was prioritized in planned DDA housing and societies (56%) as well as in colonies (52%). However, none of the respondents from urban villages prioritized this action. These responses show inconsistency in response to specific action. In addition, the study shows the potential impact of CAP process for other communities in cities that are experiencing disaster risks and impact of climate change.

Keywords

Community action planning Delhi (India) Disaster risk reduction Participatory approach Resilience Urban community 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author acknowledges the support of the Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho: MEXT) for its scholarship and Kyoto University’s Environmental Management Leadership Program (EML). Support from Global Center of Excellence (GCOE) program “Human Security Engineering for Asian Megacities” is also acknowledged. Cooperation from the Bhagidhari Cell of Delhi Government, Residential and Welfare Associations (RWAs), and SEEDS India is highly appreciated.

References

  1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate Change2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  2. Agrawala S, van Aalst M (2005) Bridging the gap between climate change and development. In: Agrawala S (ed) Linking climate change and development. OECD, Paris, pp 85–146Google Scholar
  3. Ahammad R (2011) Constraints of pro-poor climate change adaptation in Chittagong city. Environ Urban 23:503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaudox E, de Crombrugghe G, Douxchamps F, Guenuea MC, Nieuwkert M (1992) Supporting development action from identification to evaluation. Macmillan Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatt M, Gupta M, Sharma A (1999) Action planning from theory to practice. Doc Centre Urban Plann 24(3):16–23Google Scholar
  6. Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environ Change 15:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Census of India (2011) Provisional population totals, NCT of Delhi series 8. Directorate of Census Operations DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Central Ground Water Board (2006) Hydrogeological frame work and ground water management plan of NCT Delhi. State Unit Office, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakrabarti PD (2007) How rise of middle class activism in Indian cities is changing the face of local governance. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)Google Scholar
  10. DDMA (2005) District disaster management plan – East Delhi. Office of Deputy Commissioner (East) DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. Delhi State Co-operative Union (2007) The Delhi co-operative societies act, 2003. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Urban Development (2006) City development plan Delhi. Government of Delhi. IL&FS Eco smart ltd. New Delhi. http://www.ccsindia.org/ccsindia/pdf/Delhi%20CDP_Pgs%201-172.pdf. Cited 1 Sept 2011
  13. Dodman D (2008) Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment and Urbanization 2009 21: 18Google Scholar
  14. Downing T (2003) Toward a vulnerability/adaptation science: lessons from famine early warning and food security. In: Smith JB, Klein RJT, Huq S (eds) Climate change adaptive capacity and development. Imperial College Press, London, pp 77–100Google Scholar
  15. Fernandez G, Takeuchi Y, Shaw R (2011) From resilience mapping to action planning. In: Shaw R, Sharma A (eds) Climate and disaster resilience in cities. Community, environment and disaster risk management, vol 6. Emerald Group, UK, pp 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Government of India (2009) State and District Administration - Fifteenth Report. Second Administrative Reforms Commission, New Delhi, p 310Google Scholar
  17. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (2006) Delhi human development report 2006. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (2008) Guidelines and procedure for seeking registration of a society for Residents and Welfare Association (RWAs) under the societies registration act, 1860. Office of the Commissioner of Industries, Delhi, p 22Google Scholar
  19. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (2010) Residents’ welfare association directory 2010. Bhagidari Cell (The citizen-Government Partnership), Government of NCT of DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamdi N, Goethert R (1997) Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Wiley, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardoy JE, Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D (eds) (2004) Environmental problems in an urbanizing world. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatfield (2006) Using Participatory Methodologies, Geographic Information Systems and Earth Observation Data to Map Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Hong Ha Commune, Thua Thien Hue, Viet Nam. EOSTEM Project Milestone 9 Report. Hatfield Consultants, West VancouverGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoeppe P, Gurenko EN (2007) Scientific and economic rationales for innovative climate insurance solutions. In: Gurenko EN (ed) Climate change and insurance: disaster risks financing in developing countries. Earthscan Publications, London, pp 607–620Google Scholar
  24. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. IPCC Third Assessment Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Google Scholar
  25. IPCC (2007a) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability – summary for policy makers. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2007b) Climate change 2007: working group II: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)Google Scholar
  27. IPCC (2007c) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Joerin J, Shaw R (2011) Mapping climate and disaster resilience in cities. In: Shaw R, Sharma A (eds) Climate and disaster resilience in cities. Community, environment and disaster risk management, vol 6. Emerald Group, UK, pp 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones R, Rahman A (2007) Community based adaptation. Tiempo 64:17–19Google Scholar
  30. Lankao PR (2008) Urban areas and climate change: review of current issues and trends. Issues Paper for the 2011 Global Report on Human SettlementsGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehrotra S, Natenzon CE, Omojola A, Folorunsho R, Gilbride J, Rosenzweig (2009) Framework for city climate risk assessment. Fifth Urban Research Symposium 2009Google Scholar
  32. Mehta S (2009) Economic survey of Delhi 2008–2009. Government of NCT of Delhi. Current Advertising Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, p 328Google Scholar
  33. Mulyasari F and Shaw R (2011) Civil society organization and disaster risk reduction in Indonesia: role of women, youth and faith-based groups. In: Shaw R (ed) Community based disaster risk reduction (community, environment and disaster risk reduction vol. 10). Bingley, UK (in press)Google Scholar
  34. Panda A (2011) Climate change risks & adaptation: Indian mega cities. The India Economy Review 2011, 26–33Google Scholar
  35. Parvin AG, Joerin J, Prashar S, Shaw R (2011) Climate and disaster resilience mapping at microlevel of cities. In: Shaw R, Sharma A (eds) Climate and disaster resilience in cities. Community, environment and disaster risk management, vol 6. Emerald Group, UK, pp 103–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelling M (2011) Urban governance and disaster risk reduction in the Caribbean: the experience of Oxfam GB. Environ Urban 23:383. doi: 10.1177/0956247811410012
  37. Planning Department (2001) Delhi urban environment and infrastructure improvement project (DUIIP) Delhi – 21. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Prashar S, Sharma A, Shaw R (2011) From action planning to community-based adaptation. In: Shaw R, Sharma A (eds) Climate and disaster resilience in cities. Community, environment and disaster risk management, vol 6. Emerald Group, UK, pp 163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rahman A, Kumar Y, Fazal S, Bhaskaran S (2011) Urbanization and quality of urban environment using remote sensing and GIS techniques in east Delhi – India. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:61–83Google Scholar
  40. Satterthwaite D (2011) Editorial: why is community action needed for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation? Environ Urban 23(2):339–349. doi: 10.1177/0956247811420009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Satterthwaite D, Huq S, Pelling M, Reid H, Lankao PR (2007) Adaptation to climate change in urbanareas. Human settlements discussion paper series. Working paper. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Shrivastav PP (2009) Report of the expert committee on lal dora (village habitation) and extended lal dora (village habitation) in Delhi January - 2007.Union Ministry of Urban Development, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh P (2009) Sheltering Delhi’s slums. Working Paper 230, Centre for Civil Society, New Delhi. http://www.ccsindia.org/ccsindia/downloads/intern-papers-09/sheltering-delhis-slums-230.pdf. Cited 15 Aug 2011
  44. Tanesia A (2007) Women, community radio, and post-disaster recovery process. Vol no 2. Community and Independent MediaGoogle Scholar
  45. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2007) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test. Global Environ Change 17:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Twigg J (2007) Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community. A Guide Note, DFID Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group. http://www.proventionconsortium.org/themes/default/pdfs/characteristics/community_characteristics_en_highres.pdf. Cited 10 Aug 2011
  47. World Bank (2011) Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world. World Bank, NWGoogle Scholar
  48. YJA Yamuna Jiye Abhiyaan (2007). Yamuna flood plains under siege in Delhi. A Report by YJA, Delhi. http://www.peaceinst.org/publication/book-let/Yamuna%20under%20siege%20in%20Delhi.pdf. Cited 10 Aug 2011
  49. Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity - moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change 12:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto UniversitySakyo-Ku, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations