Skip to main content

Public perception, knowledge and policy support for mitigation and adaption to Climate Change in Costa Rica: Comparisons with North American and European studies

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change volume 18, pages 303–323 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Over the past 20 years considerable efforts have been invested in exploring how the public understands climate change. However, the bulk of this research has been conducted in Europe and North America and little is known about public perceptions of climate change in developing countries. This article presents the results of the first nationally representative study (n = 1473) of public perceptions of climate change in Costa Rica. In Costa Rica, a large proportion of interviewees (i.e. over 85%) are highly concerned about climate change in general and feel, as noted in European and North American studies, that its impacts are more worrisome for people farthest away (e.g. in the developed countries or among future generations). At the local level, people feel that food (10.5%) and water (16.1%) shortages as well as poverty (11.3%) and heat waves (11.7%) are the most expected impacts of climate change. Analysis of adaptation behaviour responses suggest that individuals have a relatively lower grasp of emergency and prevention disaster plans but are relatively more proactive in preventing hydro-meteorological extremes related to water scarcity or excess. A majority of respondents engage in mitigation behaviours largely for financial or contextual reasons. Finally, support for adaptation and mitigation policy responses is generally high (i.e. above 70% of interviewee supports them) except for the case of internalizing the cost of watershed protection increasing the water tariffs (52.5%). As discussions about mitigation and adaptation become increasingly common within developing countries, questions about public perceptions in that context are more pressing than ever. Work on climate perceptions needs to be carried out in specific countries to better understand which policies are most likely to resonate with public support, and which might be most difficult to implement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. http://environment.harvard.edu/news/huce-headlines/costa-rica-takes-carbon-neutrality-challenge accessed on 17 January 2012.

  2. Costa Rica together with Spain and the USA have launched the Adaptation Partnership at the Petersberg Ministerial Climate Dialogue hosted by the governments of Germany and Mexico in May 2010 (http://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/IDIOMAS/9/Gobierno/News/2011/08122011_DurbanSummit.htm).

  3. NAMAs were first introduced in the Bali Action Plan (UNFCCC 2007) as a method by which developing countries could access financial or technical assistance from developed countries to facilitate the implementation of domestic mitigation actions.

  4. In total 1500 interviews were attempted, but some were incomplete or interrupted, resulting in 1473 complete interviews.

  5. Other authors have measured knowledge of climate change slightly differently due to specific research interests. For example, Sundblad and colleagues (2009) measured knowledge with true/false scales but also added items measuring confidence in one’s own information on climate change given their interest in analyzing the influence of knowledge and confidence on general concern of climate change among different social groups. In their work, these authors measured knowledge using questions with a relatively greater technical content (e.g. including specific thresholds of climate change impacts) given their interest to discriminate among social groups with scientific technical expertise and others. Similarly, in their questionnaires Bostrom and colleagues (1994) focused mainly on knowledge of climate change and measured it using mental model interviews which are more easily applicable to a much smaller sample (n = 100) than ours, allowing in-depth exploration of differences between lay people’s and experts’ understanding of climate change.

  6. According to NISC (2002) 62% of women economically active and inactive above 12 years old in the country are dedicated to household care.

  7. With the exception of “I” all policies are actually pursued in Costa Rica. Policy “C” is only in San Jose, policies “D” and “E” refer to the use of oil tax revenues for PES.

References

  • Adelekan IO, Gbadegesin AS (2005) Analysis of the public perception of climate change issues in an indigenous African city. Int J Environ Stud 62(1)

  • Antilla L (2005) Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 15(4):338–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asiyanbi AP (2011) “I don’t get this climate stuff!” Climate change knowledge, perception and concern among corporate elites in Lagos. Unpublished dissertation, King’s College London, United Kingdom

  • Bales S (2007) Framing global warming in Canada: a frameworks message memo. Frameworks Institute, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell A (1994) Climate of opinion - public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse Soc 5(1):33–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett S (2009) Dividing climate change: global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change 99(1–2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum N (2007) Environmental education in Costa Rica: building a framework for sustainable development? Int J Educ Dev 28(3):348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bord RJ, Fisher A, O’Connor RE (1998) Public perceptions of global warming: United States and International Perspectives. Clim Res 11(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher A (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Publ Understand Sci 9(3):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D (1994) What do people know about global climate-change .1. Mental Models. Risk Anal 14(6):959–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 14(2):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brechin S (2003) Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the US versus the world? Int J Sociol Soc Pol 23(10):106–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard D, Shanahan J, McComas K (2004) Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Comm Soc 7(3):359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R, Akter S, Brander L, Haque E (2007) Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Anal 27(2):313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley H (2000) Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Publ Understand Sci 9:313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce M, Rosendo S, Brown K (2010) Perceptions of climate change, multiple stressors and livelihoods on marginal African coasts. Environ Dev Sustain 12(3):407–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R, Louviere J, Wei E (2010) Alternative australian climate change plans: the public’s views. Energy Policy 38:902–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Anal 25(6):1457–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comité Nacional de Emergencia (CNE) (1993) Organización nacional del País para casos de emergencia o desastre. Comisión Nacional de Emergencia (Direccion de Planes y Operaciones), San Jose, Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Darier É, Schüle R (1999) Think globally, act locally? Climate change and public participation in Manchester and Frankfurt. Local Environ 4(3):317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Dan A, Rachael S (2007) Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol 72(2):185–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobles R (2008) Summary of the National Climate Change Strategy. Ministry of Environment and Energy, San Jose, Costa Rica

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE (1998) Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-National context. Int Sociol 13(4):473–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin D, Ho E (2007) Climate change: perceptions and discourses of risk. J Risk Res 10(5):623–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R (2010) When environmental issues collide: climate change and the shifting political ecology of hydroelectric power. Peace Conflict Rev 5(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • GlobeScan (2007) All countries need to take major steps on climate change: Global Poll. Available at: http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbc_climate/; accessed March 2011.

  • Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) (2010) Science, technology, and innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean: a statistical compendium of indicators. Science and Technology Division-IADB, Washington D.C, p 117

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir B, Dahinden U, Swartling AG, Schule R, Tabara D, Jaeger CC (2000) Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy Use. Global Environ Change 10:169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton W (1991) Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environ Change 1(3):183–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby A (2004) Britons unsure of climate costs. BBC Public Opinion Poll. http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/28_07_04_climatepoll.pdf. Accessed March 2011.

  • Leiserowitz A (2003) Global warming in the American mind: The roles of affect, imagery, and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behaviour. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene

  • Leiserowitz A (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25(6):1433–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2007) International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change, Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. UNDP Human Development Report Office

  • Löfstedt R (1991) Climate change perceptions and energy use decisions in northern Sweden. Global Environ Change 1(4):321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 77(1–2):73–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Leiserowitz A, DeFranca D, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2006) Cross-national comparisons of image associations with “global warming” and “climate change” among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. J Risk Res 9(3):265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholsoncole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environ Change 17(3–4):445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, Franca Doria M, Haynes K, Vincent K (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Publ Understand Sci 15(4):435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison D (2007) The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. Policy Research Working Paper (No.WPS4308). The World Bank Development Research Group: Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team.

  • McDaniels TL, Axelrod L, Slovic P (1996) Perceived ecological risks of global change. Global Environ Change 6(2):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie-Mohr D (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Ambiente, Energía y Telecomunicaciones (MINAET) (2009) Estrategia Nacional de Cambio Climatico. San Jose, Costa Rica: Government of Costa Rica.107 pp

  • Ministerio de Planificación Nacional y Economia Política (MIDEPLAN) (2010) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2011–2014. San Jose, Costa Rica, 256pp

  • National Institute for Statistics and Censuses (NISC, 2002). Multiple Purposes Household Survey 2000. San jose, Costa Rica; consulted at: www.inec.go.cr/

  • National Meteorological Institute (NMI) (2010) Second National Communication to the UNFCCC. San Jose, Costa Rica, 265 pp

  • Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) The polls trends: twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Publ Opin Q 71(3):444–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard KM (2006) “We don’t really want to know” - Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organ Environ 19(3):347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton A, Leaman J (2004) The day after tomorrow: public opinion on climate change. MORI Social Research Institute.

  • O’Connor RE, Bord RJ et al (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19(3):461–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohe M, Ikeda S (2005) Global warming: risk perception and risk mitigating behavior in Japan. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 10:221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palutikof JP, Agnew MD, Hoar MR (2004) Public perceptions of unusually warm weather in the UK: impacts, responses and adaptations. Clim Res 26:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchen M (2010) What shapes public reactions to climate change? Overview of research and policy implications. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 10(1):47–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt A, Schroter D (2008) Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: implications for the success of adaptation strategies. Global Environ Change 18(3):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Centre (2009a) Modest support for “Cap and Trade” Policy. News Release. Washington D.C. Thursday October 22, 2009

  • Pew Research Centre (2009b) Environment, immigration, health care slip down the list. News Release. Washington D.C. Thursday January 22, 2009

  • Ponce LO (2006) Economic instruments in water management: the case of Costa Rica. Natural and Energy Resources, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC), Mexico, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2003) Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: Main findings of a British survey of five risk cases. Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East Anglia

  • Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Smuts T (1994) What do people know about global climate-change. 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 14(6):971–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D, Morgan MG (2010) Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 30(10):1520–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik H (2008) Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth. Clim Change 90(3):333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behaviour change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environ Change 20(3):472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (2010) SPSS Base 19.0 for windows. SPSS Inc, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleeman S, O’Riordan T, Jaeger CG (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environ Change 11:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundblad E, Biel A, Gärling T (2009) Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environ Behav 41:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi B (2010) Framing and sources: a study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE. Publ Understand Sci 20(4):543–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi B, Meisner M (2011) Comparing influences on Peruvian Climate Change Policy: information, knowledge, and concern among political elites. J Intercult Comm Res 40(3):181–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Publ Understand Sci 5(3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CM, Eakin H, Castellanos EJ (2010) Perceptions of risk and adaptation: Coffee producers, market shocks, and extreme weather in Central America and Mexico. Global Environ Change 20(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2005) Submission from Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action (No. FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1).

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2009) Copenhagen accord appendix II: Nationally appropriate mitigation actions of Developing Country Parties. Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Valdivia C, Seth A, Gilles JL, García M, Jiménez E, Cusicanqui J, Navia F, Yucra E (2010) Adapting to climate change in Andean ecosystems: Landscapes, capitals, and perceptions shaping rural livelihood strategies and linking knowledge systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(4):818–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H (2007) Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32(1):169–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearley S (2000) Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study. Publ Understand Sci 9:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran S, Brody S, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour 19(9):771–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick M, Renn O (2002) Perception and evaluation of risks findings of the Baden-Württemberg risk survey 2001 (No. 203)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Initiative Peace with Nature of the Government of Costa Rica for supporting this research and the Country office of the United Nations Development Program. We also would like to thank Marco Otarola and Sylvia Leon for their support in the initial phases of the survey. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the organizations involved. This research was supported by a grant from the International Opportunities Fund of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the University of British Columbia. The efforts of Tim McDaniels and Raffaele Vignola were supported by the Climate and Energy Decision-Making Center (CEDM) located in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy, through a cooperative agreement between the National Science Foundation (SES-0949710) and Carnegie Mellon University. The CEDM in turn supports researchers in the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Climate Change, Ecosystem Services and Land Use Policy Research, Climate Change Program, CATIE, 7170, Turrialba, Costa Rica

    R. Vignola & T. McDaniels

  2. Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    R. Vignola, S. Klinsky, J. Tam & T. McDaniels

  3. School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    T. McDaniels

  4. Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    S. Klinsky

Authors
  1. R. Vignola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Klinsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Tam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. McDaniels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Vignola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vignola, R., Klinsky, S., Tam, J. et al. Public perception, knowledge and policy support for mitigation and adaption to Climate Change in Costa Rica: Comparisons with North American and European studies. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 18, 303–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9364-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9364-8

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Public perception
  • Costa Rica
  • Mitigation
  • Adaptation